[sdb420]

Onto the nxt

[horsecs]

(sigh) ... I'm relieved. I almost thought someone was going to start that damn debate about cops rightly or wrongly shooting.....again. I don't have an issue with them killing the asshole that threatened working people. Shooting in the center of mass is better....yah?

[William May]

I really don't give a fuck WHAT you charge at me with. If my gun is with me, you will be plugged.
Glad we have "Stand your ground" laws here in the U.S. If you didn't provoke it, and someone attacks you, you can defend yourself with no fear of prosecution or lawsuit.
Mental illness is NO EXCUSE! If they are sane enough to commit the crime, they are sane enough to suffer the consequences.

[DaBigNob]

Originally Posted by Baphomet67 ↗

The offender got what he wanted.
The cops once again used excessive force- i would have thought that this was in america.

It only takes 1 or 2 bullets to the legs or lower torso to demobilize a target.(call the ambulance get him the help he needed-make the arrest)
If they were aiming for the leg/lower torso then i could see them using as many shots as they wanted until the offender was demobilized. (more chance of living)

There were 4 kill shots at that close of range.
They were aiming for the head/upper torso.
Its not like he had a gun... it was a pair of scissors.
If he were armed with a firearm then shoot to kill.

I also like how it seems police everywhere make the kill and then say "drop it right now" or something like that after the offender is already dead or dying.
They shoot to kill not demobilize and apprehend on cases like these.
The offender knew what would happen and people like that take full advantage of the situation.
Cases like these are assisted suicide but they just will not admit it. If thats really the case then they should just offer it- feel like suicide? go to your local PD and have them put one in your skull.

If thats not whats really happening then the police need more training on how to apprehend suspects without deadly force who are not armed with a firearm.

Fuck your pathetic snivelling post. The cop was entirely justified. He did exactly what his training entailed.

[Yanni]

Originally Posted by schleifspur ↗

USA, USA, USA!

the title and captions clearly indicate "sydney" and "australia"

[Yanni]

let me guess: the victim was an angry muslim

[kellyhound]

he looked like a charging bull

[hoptygopty]

Originally Posted by Baphomet67 ↗

The offender got what he wanted.
The cops once again used excessive force- i would have thought that this was in america.

It only takes 1 or 2 bullets to the legs or lower torso to demobilize a target.(call the ambulance get him the help he needed-make the arrest)
If they were aiming for the leg/lower torso then i could see them using as many shots as they wanted until the offender was demobilized. (more chance of living)

There were 4 kill shots at that close of range.
They were aiming for the head/upper torso.
Its not like he had a gun... it was a pair of scissors.
If he were armed with a firearm then shoot to kill.

I also like how it seems police everywhere make the kill and then say "drop it right now" or something like that after the offender is already dead or dying.
They shoot to kill not demobilize and apprehend on cases like these.
The offender knew what would happen and people like that take full advantage of the situation.
Cases like these are assisted suicide but they just will not admit it. If thats really the case then they should just offer it- feel like suicide? go to your local PD and have them put one in your skull.

If thats not whats really happening then the police need more training on how to apprehend suspects without deadly force who are not armed with a firearm.

You can't seriously be that ignorant, if you're born in '67

[cecilbdeadly]

Wow, right next to where I buy my coffee when i go into town.

[crunchy]

Originally Posted by schleifspur ↗

USA, USA, USA!

LMAO