[SATAN12345]

Justified.

[docfr8]

Originally Posted by Tyrantus ↗

Do you know what it's called when you intentionally take someone's child and don't tell the parents where they are?

----

So, if I'm understanding you correctly, you're saying killing someone like this is an appropriate response for this level of "property violation", and not at all ridiculous. Hmm, ok.

He shouldve just noted the encounter for the courts and left, or wait for the cops, but I'm not going to fault this dude for being reasonably upset at his ex and her Karen husband for jerking him around like that for apparently no good reason other than to fuck with him. Breaking out the shotgun only served to escalated the situation though and was totally unnecessary, but it's Texas, and he had every right to break it out at his house, but he also had the right to use some restraint.

....The only thing violated here was his ego.

-------------------------------------------------------------------

Originally Posted by RogerSmithLikesDrugs ↗

Can I smell your fingers?

These days it's Cree Native with a hint French Canadien

[Arevalosocom]

Told to leave/Tresspassing........ Check
Threatens property owner to disarm them and kill them........Check
Fucks around and Finds out .....Check.

Not guilty.

Shooter has not even been cuffed and since he plans to use Castle Doctrine in Texas no less. He won't be.

[Meat]

I didn’t see any live, laugh, love in that house whatsoever.

[CombatVet]

Metrosexual pussies

[pokerplay]

Originally Posted by CombatVet ↗

Metrosexual pussies

How dare you sir. If you don't retract that comment, I'm going to journal about this online sipping goat's milk.

[chechnya]

Originally Posted by Tyrantus ↗

Texas penal code

The use of deadly force is not justified under this subchapter except as provided in Sections 9.32, 9.33, and 9.34.

(e)A person who has a right to be present at the location where the force is used, who has not provoked the person against whom the force is used, and who is not engaged in criminal activity at the time the force is used is not required to retreat before using force as described by this section.

You literally just disproved your point. LOL. He's physically provoking the home owner, then assaults him. This is a classic Stand Your Ground case.

You're just applying your bleeding heart emotions to law and that's where you went wrong.

Sorry bro, but he's not being charged, not now or in the future. This was a legitimate self defense case.

[ironmike]

Originally Posted by docfr8 ↗

He didn't need to come with deadly force... please dont be one of those shitheads that disects a passage to change the narrative

deadly force was not required...

He could have waited for the cops to remove the man from his property...

He wanted his child and they are refusing that.. Let the law take care of that shit..

NOT USE DEADLY FORCE AND BE JUDGE, JURY, AND EXECUTIONER

Doc I agree. Go in your house, lock the door, call the police. Done. Now, if guy kicks the door in, different story but coming outside with the weapon was unnecessary, redneck mentality. I'm guessing the ex is a bitch, constantly fucking with the guy when it was his turn to have time with the kid, so I do understand the guy's rage, but God man.. go home and call your lawyer.

[HYPRTCKR]

~ The court will find the dead man in his right, if he had the right to have custody of his son thru previous court proceedings, for whatever regular time period intervals.
~ It's what happens when a naive man with a gun follows a foolish woman's inklings. He will end up in jail & she will get off scott free.

[tbone79]

That’s absolutely insane

It was a valid, sane argument until Billy Bob went in and got his ar-15. What in the fuck right did he have to go brandishing that…during an unarmed argument.

I hope he goes to prison