[vanb]

Such high profile cases always attract top lawyers as it gives them a prominent place in the spot lights as well. Huge PR for the lawyer, fee not important.

[goregirl]

This may be the last, or one of the last, remaining copies of the video online...I couldn't find another and I'm usually pretty adept at locating such things. Cheers!

[Zee86]

Giggled when i read this in The Sun:

"Armed cops escorted him to jail.

Police said the high security was needed to thwart his “admirers”."

[Pyramid_Head]

Not in the least shocked that he pleads "not guilty". Just hope they don't put the sack of shit in a looney bin.

[Steve]

Look at him he is a frightened scrawny wretch, they are gonna love him in prison.

[Eternally Solo]

For any Canadians ...

Is there a law that's equivalent to the State's Son of Sam law? Where a criminal can't profit from there crime (i.e. books, movies, etc)? I know there are some provinces that have tried introducing it, I just didn't know if it's been adapted country-wide.


Oh, and there should also be a law against full in-boxes as well

[gatagato]

Originally Posted by Eternally Solo ↗

For any Canadians ...

Is there a law that's equivalent to the State's Son of Sam law? Where a criminal can't profit from there crime (i.e. books, movies, etc)? I know there are some provinces that have tried introducing it, I just didn't know if it's been adapted country-wide.


Oh, and there should also be a law against full in-boxes as well

I'm not Canadian, butr i guess this is what you were looking for

In Canada, there are four provinces which regulate whether an offender can profit from the recounting of their crimes (for example, by writing a book about their crimes and receiving the money made by selling that book). These provinces are Alberta, Saskatchewan, Ontario, and Nova Scotia. The provincial acts which regulate this law state only that an offender convicted of designated crimes is prohibited from profiting from the recounting of their crimes, and does not ban them from the act of actually recounting them. This means that a person can retell their crimes in any way that they would like to, but that they cannot profit from it (for example, they could write the book, but can’t receive any of the sales profits).

Designated crimes (offences which an offender cannot profit from recounting) vary from province to province, but all include:

An indictable offence for which the maximum penalty is 5 years or more and that involves the use of violence against another person.
Or, (i) that involved conduct which can endanger the life or safety of another person, or that inflicted or is likely to inflict severe psychological damage on another person, (ii) is an offence or attempt to commit an offence under section 271, 272 or 273 of the Criminal Code of Canada, or (iii) is a serious property offence.
This applies to offences committed in Canada, as well as similarly described offences outside of Canada (If a person committed a murder outside of Canada, and then returned to Ontario for example, under Ontario law they could not then profit from the recounting of that crime).
Additional designated offences in Nova Scotia include offences found in section 151, 152, and 153 of the Criminal Code of Canada. In Alberta, additional offences include offences found under the Crimes Against Humanity and War Times Act of Canada, as well as serious drug offences for which an offender could receive a sentence of 7 years in prison or more. In Saskatchewan, additional crimes include those associated with § 163.1, and 172.1 of the Criminal Code of Canada.

As mentioned, if a person decides to retell their crime they cannot collect a profit from doing this. If a profit is made from the recounting of a crime, this money must be paid to and received by the appropriate Minister of the province (such as the Attorney General) where the criminal is residing and not the offender. The Minister will then distribute the money to the provincial victim’s fund or other programs designed to assist victims and their families, depending on the circumstances within each province.

The above information also applies to memorabilia used, owned, possessed, autographed, made or manufactured, or produced by a person convicted of a designated offence. An offender cannot receive any profit made by the selling or auctioning of any of those items. The actual act of selling or auctioning the item is not prohibited, only the receipt of profit. Thus, if an offender was to auction an autographed piece of personal clothing (such as a t-shirt), they would only be permitted to receive the amount of money that this item would be worth if it had not been signed by the offender. For example, if an offender signed a t-shirt that he or she bought for $15.00 and then signed it and sold it for $50.00, he or she could only receive the original amount of $15.00 and the rest would be collected by the Minister and used in the same way as outlined above.

http://www.victimsofviolence.on.ca/r...405&Itemid=285

The text of each provincial act can be found at:

Alberta - Alberta Criminal Notoriety Act, S.A. 2005, c. C-32.5:
http://www.canlii.org/en/ab/laws/sta...c-32.5/latest/

Saskatchewan - Saskatchewan Profits of Criminal Notoriety Act, S.S. 2009, c. P-28.1:
http://www.canlii.org/en/sk/laws/sta...p-28.1/latest/

Ontario - Ontario Prohibiting Profiting from Recounting Crimes Act 2002, S.O. 2002, c.2:
http://www.canlii.org/en/on/laws/sta...02-c-2/latest/

Nova Scotia - Nova Scotia Criminal Notoriety Act, S.A. 2005, c. C-32.5:
http://www.canlii.org/en/ns/laws/sta...6-c-14/latest/

[Vera Wang]

Originally Posted by JulianTD ↗

Here is an interesting topic on magnotta's meth use and the killing:

http://www.drugs-forum.com/forum/sho...d.php?t=187185

Thanks for the link, but this is a locked forum. Any chance of someone with access copy and pasting or screen capping the relevant info? (I daren't join that forum! )

[Fulcanelli]

Originally Posted by Vera Wang ↗

Thanks for the link, but this is a locked forum. Any chance of someone with access copy and pasting or screen capping the relevant info? (I daren't join that forum! )

Sure, here it is.

I knew it. I felt it. It was as clear as the incessant call of crystal meth itself, on those nights when a seductive phantom of the drug cozies up to me in bed and brings its knitting.
In a Huffington Post news article on accused killer Luka Rocco Magnotta, buried in the story pages deep, a former lover says that the alleged murderer used methamphetamine, the drug popular among gay men that has claimed years of my life and left countless men in utter wreckage.
The story of the Canadian “low budget porn actor” has horrified the public with its harrowing details of torture, cannibalism, and necrophilia. The young man has been accused of killing a student, cutting him to pieces, and then mailing body parts to various locations. He allegedly consumed some of his victim and performed sexual acts with the body. He is also accused of uploading a video recording of the crime onto the internet.
Horrific, yes. But the sheer madness of the crimes, and the killer’s insane determination to make it as shocking as possible, was sickeningly familiar to a recovering methamphetamine addict like me. There is no evidence yet that crystal meth played a role in these crimes, but allow me to explain why the mix of porn, insanity and meth use struck a disturbing chord with me.
Among gay men who use recreational drugs, crystal meth abuse remains epidemic, sought for its fabled power to heighten sexual desire. In the last ten years, “crystal” has emptied nightclubs and sentenced friends to the isolation of online porn or to the emotional wasteland of “party and play” orgies frequented by fellow addicts, where syringes are common and condoms are not, and which feature exhausted, drug-driven sexual compulsives. The events have all the charm of dead bodies having sex.
Just as the drug demands more in its pursuit of the thrill of that first transformative rush, so does the sexual psyche. Before long, typical sexual behavior isn’t enough in the life of a crystal addict, and more extreme components are brought into play, such as risk and location, props and posturing, all as users experience a darkening of the sexual landscape that would cause your very soul to shudder.
In my experience, finding sexual fantasies to stimulate the weathered sexuality of meth abuse means exploring alien territory, where nothing is off-limits and the darker, the better. It becomes a perverse game of one-upmanship between addicts on the depths each will plummet for the sexual shock needed. You think about violence, one might ask the other. Fine, but have you ever thought about this? That’s hot, says the other, but what I really think about doing… is this.
Never mind that the images they are conjuring have never occurred to either of them prior to their addiction. They are mining something much darker than their authentic sexuality has ever known, all in the service of an insatiable sexual craving poisoned by a drug made with ingredients like ether, Drano and brake fluid. And so their perverse tales build and accelerate, tossed back and forth like playing volleyball with a severed head.
This is why the exploits of Mr. Magnotta set off my meth addict radar. The very outrageousness of his vile acts felt, to me, like an addict who had explored the depths of his imagination and come up short, for whom the depravity couldn’t be satisfied any longer without being made flesh. Whether his pre-existing insanity carried him across a mortal line or crystal meth pushed him over it, we don’t yet know. But meth addicts like me were shaking their heads at the accounts of Magnotta’s heinous acts and wondering why the rest of the world hadn’t suspected the connection, and why news reports hardly mentioned his crystal use as if it weren’t particularly relevant.
There are horrors that don’t arise from childhood abuse, or sociopathology or even garden variety insanity. They come from a white crystallized substance that promises everything and delivers nothing, that rewires your brain and twists your most human instincts into something that repulses even you.
Do meth addicts regularly commit murder? Of course not. But I have spent a few sleepless nights since the Magnotta story surfaced, haunted by fantasies I shared with other addicts that I had hoped to never face again.
I received a gift that too many addicts do not, the gift of finding help and taking it. Without my personal fortitude, without the trip to rehab or hitting bottom or the grace of God himself, my meth-soaked daydreams might have eventually hungered for something more intense, and beyond the safety of simple fantasy.
Instead, I have been saved, today, from what lies behind the darkest curtain. But make no mistake, I carry the burden of regrets, and they include those with a very human toll.
During the bleary days and nights of my last crystal meth relapse, I happened across a friend with whom I had been acquainted in a mutual program of drug addiction recovery. We didn’t speak of it during our few hours together, satisfied to smoke and inject meth without the intrusion of cleaner days. But being in his company vexed me. I had always ignored and denied my relapses to others in recovery and this occasion would be no different. If you didn’t see me do it, it didn’t happen. But this friend had seen, had known, and could later finger me as a liar.
If he came back into recovery, that is. And so, when considering this chance meeting of two meth users adrift, I had only one thought. One selfish, depraved and evil thought.
Maybe he won’t come back. Then no one will know about my lies.
For this addict in recovery, those who don’t come back from an extended relapse usually have met one of several possible fates, most of them dire. They may have been arrested and now face time in our horrendous penal system, or they are strapped to a gurney somewhere with serious bodily injury or a broken mind, or maybe they’re dead. To secretly hope anyone doesn’t come back from a relapse feels downright sociopathic.
What is the difference, I might ask, between taking a life outright and hoping another suffering addict continues sticking toxic needles in his arm, sentencing him to serious if not mortal consequences?
That man with whom I shared part of my relapse deserves to be in recovery – and I actually wished he wouldn’t find it. To call him my friend is a disgrace.
I might as well have cut him up into little pieces.

(Source: blog "My Fabulous Disease" by Mark S. King, June 8th post "The Crystal Meth Connection of the Gay Porn Killer" (sorry can't post links). The opinions in this blog article are not mine, but that of Mark S. King. I have no experience with crystal methamphetamine, nor do I pretend to be an expert on the subject.)

[Vera Wang]

That was an interesting read. If Eric had problems with meth, it would certainly explain him losing his looks over the last few years. Thanks for posting