|
#52
●
12-13-2010, 03:20 PM
| ||||||||
 My Rank: STAFF SERGEANT Poster Rank:757 Macho Join Date: Feb 2010 Posts: 1,061 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Quoted: 96 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: First Person Shooter Executions
here is the catch, It's actually not a murder, it's a punishment. for those who work (with/for) enemy. apperantly these folks worked for us and got cought and punished... What is the charge in us for spying?life time?or execution? just curious . |
|
#55
●
12-13-2010, 11:35 PM
| ||||||||
 My Rank: GUNNERY SERGEANT Poster Rank:609 Female Join Date: Nov 2009 Posts: 1,493 Mentioned: 1 Post(s) Quoted: 140 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: First Person Shooter Executions
We are not the enemy of the Iraqi people. We are their allies. They want freedom from fanatical religious oppression and we are trying to help them achieve it. Also, we do not execute prisoners of war. If this were the 1940's would you defend the actions of Adolph Hitler just because he was murdering Jews within the German border? Would you say "we should stay out of it. It's an internal affair"? It's very popular these days to bad-mouth the U.S. because we "rattle our sabre" in many other countries, but we do it to because we honestly believe it's the right thing to do. Freedom has nothing to do with religion or politics. It's a basic human right. Our 16th president Abraham Lincoln said it best..."Those who deny freedom to others deserve it not themselves"  |
|
#56
●
12-19-2010, 02:26 PM
| ||||||||
| My Rank: STAFF SERGEANT Poster Rank:757 Macho Join Date: Feb 2010 Posts: 1,061 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Quoted: 96 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: First Person Shooter Executions
iraqi's liked the fact that saddam was cought and executed which i agree with that.but they didn't think that united states was gonna sit there for years to establish their oil settlements.and foundations. however.we all know for a fact that United States is not there for their sake nor for their freedom. it's all about "OIL" /"PROFIT". there are tons of countries out there seeking for freedom and better life. right? for example CUBA. closest soil to states.and it's a very weak country. WHY states doing shit for them? yet still holds the ambargo. long story short, IT'S ABOUT ENERGY SOURCE THAT UNITED STATES NEED FOR IT'S POEPLE.AND IT'S ECONOMY.FOR IT , IT WILL DO,INVADE,KILL ANYONE. dON'T TAKE ME WRONG ,I'M UNITED STATES CITIZEN.I JUST DON'T AGREE WITH THIS WAR. AND DON'T BELEIVE THIS 9/11 which preplanned by Unites states to have a reason to assault/attack to set it's oil companies in middle east.THAT'S ALL. if anyone can prove me wrong here please show me some facts. |
|
#57
●
12-19-2010, 11:33 PM
| ||||||||
 My Rank: GUNNERY SERGEANT Poster Rank:615 Male Join Date: Mar 2010 Posts: 1,473 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Quoted: 3 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: First Person Shooter Executions
Considering it was back in 2005. Things have changed some, but Iran still wants control of Iraq. While we work on pulling out, they work on fermenting chaos and supplying the Shiite majority with the material nessessary to force Iraq under their thumb. The Saudis know this and are shitting themselves.
|
|
#59
●
12-20-2010, 01:11 AM
| ||||||||
| My Rank: GUNNERY SERGEANT Poster Rank:609 Female Join Date: Nov 2009 Posts: 1,493 Mentioned: 1 Post(s) Quoted: 140 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: First Person Shooter Executions
First of all Cuba is a Communist country and Communism is a recognised and acceptable form of political leadership. It's not one we (U.S.) believe in, but it is accepted by the U.N. These fanatics we are fighting in Iraq have no political affiliation. So that comparison of yours goes out the window. Second, we don't need to "steal" oil from other countries. We have many sources for imported oil as well as many domestic suppliers. If you do your homework you will see that Iraq has comparatively small crude oil reserves. So your idea that we are there only for oil is ridiculous. Yes, there are lots of other countries in this world that need help changing their political and social situations, and all they have to do is "ask" for our help. Can we help them all? No. Can we help some of them? Yes. Do we do it for profit? No. Do we sometimes profit anyway? Yes. Although most of the time we lose a great deal of money and soldiers when we help. Besides, the United States is one of the youngest countries in the world and we are the leading Super-Power. We must be doing something right. By the way, next year when we come to the aid of South Korea you people who think we only invade for oil are going to have to come up with a new bull-shit story. Maybe you'll say "we are only there for their rice".
|
