[LostInParadise]

Fun comment section tonight (3am here)

[emrosscar]

You assholes really know how to mess up some quality gore.

[DoktorDoris]

Originally Posted by austinallison ↗

'I spoke my peace regarding this thread, from a scientific standpoint"

-There was nothing scientific about what you posted. You note that nature is "replete with errors," which is a correct statement. Be it evolution or whatever, nature as created things that are erroneous and things that don't make sense. Sex and gender, however, are not errors. Especially in regard to mammals (which humans are), sex and gender *always manifest themselves in differences between men and women on a brain level and a resultant biological and physiological level. There is, indeed, such a thing as a male brain and such a thing as a female brain and the existence of such organs directly relates to the genitalia that a male mammal and a female mammal are born with.

Nowhere else in the mammal animal kingdom does transgenderism exist in any tangible, measurable sense (that generally can be extended to homosexuality, too). Sure, you will have wackos that claim rare cases of monkeys jacking each other off or lizards, birds or fish acting like a member of the opposite sex, but that hardly denotes that that organism believes they are that opposite sex.

Mammalian biology, and thus human biology, is simple: male examples exist and female examples exist. Males are born with male genitalia and females are born with female genitalia. Each is born with proclivities to carry out the biological functions with the organs that they were born with.

The fact that you claim that sex organs are "superficial" is hilariously wrong. They are there for a reason and there is no argument to suggest that they are superficial or that they don't have any relation to how someone is born. From the moment a zygote is conjured, the gender and sex of that organism is set in stone genetically and biologically. Forever from that point, that organism will be tangibly a male or tangibly a female (except in rare chromosomal disorders). There is no other argument or fact.

Transgenderism is a serious and unfortunate mental disorder. The fact that we are normalizing the behaviour of masquerading around as someone of the opposite sex is preposterous. It shouldn't be normalized, but it should be understood and treated.

This bit-

"Mammalian biology, and thus human biology, is simple: male examples exist and female examples exist. Males are born with male genitalia and females are born with female genitalia. Each is born with proclivities to carry out the biological functions with the organs that they were born with."

Is abject nonsense. Human sexuality isn't just a matter of penises and vaginas going together like sockets and plugs, as though we were USB devices. I, for instance, am ostensibly straight, I have never fallen in love with a man, and I have a wife whom I adore. However I find cocks and fit young men sexually arousing, I enjoy gay porn and occasionally having gay sex.

Human sexuality is a spectrum covering a wide range of behaviours, saying otherwise is not just wrong its also deeply offensive.

[SimoneFlen']

Originally Posted by DoktorDoris ↗

I, for instance, am ostensibly straight, I have never fallen in love with a man, and I have a wife whom I adore. However I find cocks and fit young men sexually arousing, I enjoy gay porn and occasionally having gay sex.

Human sexuality is a spectrum covering a wide range of behaviours, saying otherwise is not just wrong its also deeply offensive.

You claim to 'adore' your wife, yet you lust after young men's dicks + fuck other men?! I'm sure your wife loves having sex with you in the knowledge that you've been sticking it up random men's arses.

Fucking disgusting + absolutely no respect for your wife. If you want to sleep around, then you shouldn't be in a relationship.

[Killgaad]

Though I agree with you 100%, Simone, in regards to issues of relationship faithfulness, his self-confessed infidelity is an entirely different issue, which has no bearing on the trans issues we've been discussing previously. Respectfully, you are invoking the Straw man fallacy here. _ _ _ _

[Killgaad]

DoktorDoris, I'm sorry to say it, but if you're doing that behind your wife's back—when it comes to this issue, I must agree with Simone, unless your wife approves of such extramarital behavior because both of you have already agreed previously upon it—and as such, she is fully informed and willing to go along.

But as I said, bringing up this fidelity issue does not constitute a valid refutation to the arguments you raised in your post.

I just felt compelled to clarify my concurrent 'like' and 'dislike'—as each addressed different issues in your post.

Thank you.

[Killgaad]

But frankly, what someone does in their personal life is none of our business.