[Killgaad]

Well, knock yourself out, Simone. All my previous positive opinions of you and any other former endearments are now withdrawn and permanently annulled.

I consider you to be just as rabid of a closet hater as the rest of your sycophantic, ignorant ilk—closeted or not.

Btw, your new avatar sucks.

(With a British accent:)

You are the weakest link. Goodbye.

[SimoneFlen']

Originally Posted by Killgaad ↗

Well, knock yourself out, Simone. All my previous positive opinions of you and any other former endearments are now withdrawn and permanently annulled.

I consider you to be just as rabid of a closet hater as the rest of your sycophantic, ignorant ilk—closeted or not.

Btw, your new avatar sucks.

(With a British accent:)

You are the weakest link. Goodbye.

What is it with you?! Yesterday, you tell me that you're 'deeply in love with me' - despite not even knowing me + with me barely having any interaction with you.

This shit is all very weird!

Plus, there's no such thing as a 'British accent'. There's absolutely shitloads of different accents in the UK (around 40!).

Oh + Charlie is God!

[Killgaad]

Because you have turned against me for no reason instead of debating properly and fairly and in a civil way—that's why I'm angry with you, because you're not being fair, and you keep fighting this 'like' and 'dislike' war which I don't want to fight with you. Plus there is the issue with the PMs/no messages? I'm sorry, I'm not really against you, I'm just upset. I will take some time off, since nobody seems to appreciate proper debating etiquette.
What supported me most is that you keep taking the side of these people who do not really debate the thread and issues that arise, they just troll and politicize according to a certain agenda.
Anyway, peace out.

No hard feelings. Like I said in PMs, though, I nevertheless do have a lot of respect for your prolific efforts here, better call you are unmatched, peerless expertise as a sleuth worthy of Watson—or perhaps, even Sherlock Holmes himself.

So you see... I may be a 'MENSA asshole,' according to some, but I can still be a gentleman and be fair and give respect where it's due.

Pity if it's too much to ask to expect the same in return.

Fairness above all things.

Regards, Simone.

[Killgaad]

typo: "What disappointed me most" (not "supported")

[SimoneFlen']

Originally Posted by Killgaad ↗

Because you have turned against me for no reason instead of debating properly and fairly and in a civil way—that's why I'm angry with you, because you're not being fair, and you keep fighting this 'like' and 'dislike' war which I don't want to fight with you. Plus there is the issue with the PMs/no messages? I'm sorry, I'm not really against you, I'm just upset. I will take some time off, since nobody seems to appreciate proper debating etiquette.
What supported me most is that you keep taking the side of these people who do not really debate the thread and issues that arise, they just troll and politicize according to a certain agenda.
Anyway, peace out.

No hard feelings. Like I said in PMs, though, I nevertheless do have a lot of respect for your prolific efforts here, better call you are unmatched, peerless expertise as a sleuth worthy of Watson—or perhaps, even Sherlock Holmes himself.

So you see... I may be a 'MENSA asshole,' according to some, but I can still be a gentleman and be fair and give respect where it's due.

Pity if it's too much to ask to expect the same in return.

Fairness above all things.

Regards, Simone.

Why do you keep saying that I've turned against you? I was never with you in the first place. We've not had any indepth conversations + I know nothing about you. How can you be 'angry' with me, we're not friends, this is just bizarre.

I'm not taking sides, I like + fuck off whatever posts I agree or disagree with, regardless of who posted them. What is it with some people here who are so damn offended by those 2 bloody buttons?!

Yes, I turned my PMs off because you keep messaging me with this weirdness. I have no idea why you've fixated yourself on me (though you certainly wouldn't be the first person here). It's very strange. You're way too overly emotional + also very much up your own arse.

Just enjoy the site + leave the debating for elsewhere.

[Killgaad]

Anyway, I spoke my peace regarding this thread, from a scientific standpoint—those who have ears, let them hear.

Since this is your thread and I don't want it to attract any more trolling, I'm going to take a break for a while, ok? Stay safe out there. Bye.

[SimoneFlen']

Originally Posted by Killgaad ↗

Since this is your thread and I don't want it to attract any more trolling.

6 pages in...

[Killgaad]

I'm not fixated on you, and I am not weird—as in bad-weird—I just fell for your tireless and arduous investigative prowess, and I admire that in a person—that's all.
I must confess though, that from a visual standpoint, I also did fall in love with that beautiful Neanderthal girl that used to be your avatar for so long:)

Anyway... my regards to you, still.. :)

[austinallison]

'I spoke my peace regarding this thread, from a scientific standpoint"

-There was nothing scientific about what you posted. You note that nature is "replete with errors," which is a correct statement. Be it evolution or whatever, nature as created things that are erroneous and things that don't make sense. Sex and gender, however, are not errors. Especially in regard to mammals (which humans are), sex and gender *always manifest themselves in differences between men and women on a brain level and a resultant biological and physiological level. There is, indeed, such a thing as a male brain and such a thing as a female brain and the existence of such organs directly relates to the genitalia that a male mammal and a female mammal are born with.

Nowhere else in the mammal animal kingdom does transgenderism exist in any tangible, measurable sense (that generally can be extended to homosexuality, too). Sure, you will have wackos that claim rare cases of monkeys jacking each other off or lizards, birds or fish acting like a member of the opposite sex, but that hardly denotes that that organism believes they are that opposite sex.

Mammalian biology, and thus human biology, is simple: male examples exist and female examples exist. Males are born with male genitalia and females are born with female genitalia. Each is born with proclivities to carry out the biological functions with the organs that they were born with.

The fact that you claim that sex organs are "superficial" is hilariously wrong. They are there for a reason and there is no argument to suggest that they are superficial or that they don't have any relation to how someone is born. From the moment a zygote is conjured, the gender and sex of that organism is set in stone genetically and biologically. Forever from that point, that organism will be tangibly a male or tangibly a female (except in rare chromosomal disorders). There is no other argument or fact.

Transgenderism is a serious and unfortunate mental disorder. The fact that we are normalizing the behaviour of masquerading around as someone of the opposite sex is preposterous. It shouldn't be normalized, but it should be understood and treated.

[SimoneFlen']

Originally Posted by austinallison ↗

'I spoke my peace regarding this thread, from a scientific standpoint"

-There was nothing scientific about what you posted. You note that nature is "replete with errors," which is a correct statement. Be it evolution or whatever, nature as created things that are erroneous and things that don't make sense. Sex and gender, however, are not errors. Especially in regard to mammals (which humans are), sex and gender *always manifest themselves in differences between men and women on a brain level and a resultant biological and physiological level. There is, indeed, such a thing as a male brain and such a thing as a female brain and the existence of such organs directly relates to the genitalia that a male mammal and a female mammal are born with.

Nowhere else in the mammal animal kingdom does transgenderism exist in any tangible, measurable sense (that generally can be extended to homosexuality, too). Sure, you will have wackos that claim rare cases of monkeys jacking each other off or lizards, birds or fish acting like a member of the opposite sex, but that hardly denotes that that organism believes they are that opposite sex.

Mammalian biology, and thus human biology, is simple: male examples exist and female examples exist. Males are born with male genitalia and females are born with female genitalia. Each is born with proclivities to carry out the biological functions with the organs that they were born with.

The fact that you claim that sex organs are "superficial" is hilariously wrong. They are there for a reason and there is no argument to suggest that they are superficial or that they don't have any relation to how someone is born. From the moment a zygote is conjured, the gender and sex of that organism is set in stone genetically and biologically. Forever from that point, that organism will be tangibly a male or tangibly a female (except in rare chromosomal disorders). There is no other argument or fact.

Transgenderism is a serious and unfortunate mental disorder. The fact that we are normalizing the behaviour of masquerading around as someone of the opposite sex is preposterous. It shouldn't be normalized, but it should be understood and treated.

Where have you been hiding, eh? We need rational people like you here, thank you for your post.