[WonderMomma]

I have definitely seen this video here before... but cannot locate the post. If I remember correctly there was some follow up video of someone related to this video getting popped later or from a different angle... my memory is fuzzy however.

[houseoftechno]

Originally Posted by Tyrantus ↗

If your only basis for her "being hard" is the misleading and factually incorrect thread title claiming she provoked this, then I think that makes you the biggest dumbshit. Apparently you didn't even notice the baby smile and wave at the guy that was about to kill her mother.

That woman didn't do anything to provoke the attack, and according to law enforcement, the prosecutor, the judge who said this killing was "senseless", and anyone with eyes, you can see she wasn't even the intended target, the two dudes next to her were. You see them deliberately aim at each person as they were fleeing, but they only actually fired at the men. The last thing that "dumb bitch" did was protect her baby with her life, that makes her a hero, you dumbshit.

BTW, "I feel for the child but mom got what she deserved." is a contradictory statement.

Most of what you say is wrong or not likely. Instead of regurgitating woke social media statements, here is what I actually see in the video:

1. Prior to the shooting, the woman with child and two men were idly loitering in the street. One man was leaning back upon the hood of a car.
2. The woman fumbled with her pockets both before the shooting and after she ditched down behind a parked car.
3. The woman had heavy gun-sized objects flapping around in both right and left pockets of her sweatshirt as she was dashing for cover.
4. The shooter was indeed targeting the woman. He shot her from the moving car. He later swept and fixed his gun at her position, but did not fire because she was shielded behind the car.
5. Two of her colleagues loaded the shot woman in a car and drove off with her.
6. Then another colleague ran out with a banana clipped gun and raced off in the direction of the shooter.

And here is what I speculate from what I saw in the video:

1. A pocket grab is indeed a provocation, as it is the last thing one sees on the street before they have an firearm leveled at their face.
2. A mother who is genuinely protecting her toddler in a Chicago ghetto, does not loiter in the street, turn to face an approaching car, then reach for her pockets or beltline, all with the child in her arms.
3. A mother who is genuinely protecting her toddler in a Chicago ghetto, does not associate with a man who instantly materializes carrying a banana clipped gun to chase down her assassins.
4. If she was carrying, the person in the back seat with the woman would have removed and tossed her guns before they arrived at the hospital. So of course no cops, prosecutors or judges would have any hard evidence that the woman was a bad actor on that scene.

[deadhorsey]

It’s a sad reality when a mom can’t stand on the damn street holding her baby. That same sad reality robbed this woman of common fuckin sense.

Maybe if you live in a high crime area, there are better things to with your child than dangle them around while chillin with other targets.

[OmniJackal]

Wtf she didn’t even do nothing

[Tyrantus]

Originally Posted by houseoftechno ↗

Most of what you say is wrong or not likely, here is what I actually see in the video

Didn't we prove you have selective eyesight and cognitive issues already this week? I got my info from the news, unlike you, who got your info from your ass.

[*]The woman fumbled with her pockets both before the shooting and after she ditched down behind a parked car.

Pockets... as in plural? You sure about that?

[*]The woman had heavy gun-sized objects flapping around in both right and left pockets of her sweatshirt as she was dashing for cover.

Yeah, those "heavy gun-sized" objects are called baby shoes.

[*]The shooter was indeed targeting the woman. He shot her from the moving car. He later swept and fixed his gun at her position, but did not fire because she was shielded behind the car.

-------------------

And here is what I speculate:
[*]A pocket grab is indeed a provocation, as it is the last thing one sees on the street before they have an firearm leveled at their face.

So the driver who hit the breaks before she reached for those deadly baby shoes was planning to what, ask for directions to the nearest Starbucks but felt threatened so they just decided to drop those fools instead?

[*]A mother who is genuinely protecting her toddler in a Chicago ghetto, does not associate with a man who instantly materializes carrying a banana clipped gun to chase down her assassins

So you believe living in the "ghetto" without a firearm is safer. And choosing to be with someone who was not only armed, but willing to chase down her assailants is an example of her blatant disregard for her child's safety...

[*]If she was carrying, the person in the back seat with the woman would have removed and tossed her guns before they arrived at the hospital.


You insult DR with your silly woke stories.

Yeah... I'm the one making shit up. If she were carrying, don't you think a good time to draw would've been when she was actually shielded by the car? And instead of laying face down on top of her child... posting up for a counter ambush would've made more tactical sense?

I appreciate your nice formating though, it made deconstructing that bullshit much easier.

[Suicide_Note]

These fools live in a crime ridden area on the South side of Chicago. When you're standing around in the street, as they were, these things are highly likely to happen. Fuck the lot of them, because they knew the risks and still chose to be out there.

[Patriotpride16t]

Originally Posted by Hogmann ↗

Did she have a pistol tucked into her waistband that she was showing to the car driving by? That's what it looked like

It did look like a weapon, but I think it was just the baby’s shoe.

[Hogmann]

Originally Posted by Patriotpride16t ↗

It did look like a weapon, but I think it was just the baby’s shoe.

Shoes can be weapons!

[CombatVet]

Woman endangered her child because it was more important to defend “street cred” than your own flesh & blood. But the man that pulled the trigger took out the mouthy woman and didn’t hit the child - kinda strikes me as something to commend him for. She fucked around, and she found out.

[hughjardon67]

Originally Posted by Tyrantus ↗

Yeah, apparently that was the baby's father. He wasn't able to catch up to them, but the cops did a few hours later.

Ummm...that guy got duhfuk out of dodge when the firing started (you can see him exit the passenger side of the vehicle--his red undies clearly visible). And I didn't see him attempt to protect his baby or his wounded baby mama. So...I'm not convinced he was truly going after them vs. getting the hell outta there before the cops showed up and slapped the cuffs on him for having outstanding warrants.