[shoottokill]

Originally Posted by Lee ↗

People with your disposition are in the wrong place here, If you can't stomach a LIVING child with a few burns then you need to find the nearest exit, that goes for the rest that will join your bandwagon in this thread and others.

it's a matter of posting a warning beforehand like your supposed to. I wouldn't have clicked into it had a known a kid was badly burnt. i avoid it...because i know there are warnings associated with these kinds of posts. But i guess someone thinks they are better than the rules that are in place. i have no business clicking into baby/kid injuries/death, so fucking put up the warning next time....simple as that.

[Lee]

Originally Posted by shoottokill ↗

so are you saying there no should be no child warnings now, with these posts? other people give child warnings. I guess your special or something, huh?

It's a living child with burns in a medical section, not dead/murdered/mutilated/abused etc etc

Whats your issue with it? obviously not that bad to warrant you viewing it again, FYI Kelly always puts child warnings on posts that require them.

If your so weak stomached then why are you here? really?

So what is your business of looking at dead people? you can't have the best of both.

[shoottokill]

Originally Posted by Lee ↗

It's a living child with burns in a medical section, not dead/murdered/mutilated/abused etc etc

Whats your issue with it? obviously not that bad to warrant you viewing it again, FYI Kelly always puts child warnings on posts that require them.

If your so weak stomached then why are you here? really?

So what is your business of looking at dead people? you can't have the best of both.

it's not a matter of being weak stomached...i have seen the pics of the burnt kid a few times now. i mean if i saw it the 1st time it's not gonna change or anything....it's still going to be fucked up. just put up the warning instead of posting a vague title such as "burnt with boiling water." that's not referring to a kid in the slightest.

[Faline]

Originally Posted by shoottokill ↗

so are you saying there no should be no child warnings now, with these posts? other people give child warnings. I guess your special or something, huh?

People give child warnings when the child is dead in death pictures.
And there is no rule saying it has to be given either.
I am one of the very few people on this site that actually add child warnings, out of courtesy. When there isn't one on a dead child thread i add one. So i have no idea why you have such beef over an alive child that had no child warning.

[Faline]

Originally Posted by shoottokill ↗

it's a matter of posting a warning beforehand like your supposed to. I wouldn't have clicked into it had a known a kid was badly burnt. i avoid it...because i know there are warnings associated with these kinds of posts. But i guess someone thinks they are better than the rules that are in place. i have no business clicking into baby/kid injuries/death, so fucking put up the warning next time....simple as that.

Where is the rule that states that?
And no i do not think i am better than any one so what a really pathetic ignorant thing to say.

I post countless threads here daily...countless and sometimes it is actually possible to do numerous things like forget child warning, even spell things wrong when providing a vast amount of stuff for a site. It happens. Get over it.

[Viking64]

Originally Posted by shoottokill ↗

its pretty easy to type up some shit to seem like a cool motherfucker. but in your case old man, it's very pervy. i hope you choke while putting in your dentures. enjoy the burnt girl, asshole

You're just being a fucking whining pussy. If you can't take it, fuck off.

[Lee]

Originally Posted by shoottokill ↗

it's not a matter of being weak stomached...i have seen the pics of the burnt kid a few times now. i mean if i saw it the 1st time it's not gonna change or anything....it's still going to be fucked up. just put up the warning instead of posting a vague title such as "burnt with boiling water." that's not referring to a kid in the slightest.

Have you ever contributed so i can see one of your perfectly titled threads?

[shoottokill]

Originally Posted by Viking64 ↗

You're just being a fucking whining pussy. If you can't take it, fuck off.

hey old man, keep trying to pee with some zest. it won't come back you know. those old days of peeing like a river are gone for you, as is fucking your old friend "pete." i feel sorry you can't butt fuck him anymore. the old penis has withered away, huh old man. i know you type with "authority," and zeal, sitting stroking your softie while watching burnt kids. your day will come

[Viking64]

Originally Posted by shoottokill ↗

hey old man, keep trying to pee with some zest. it won't come back you know. those old days of peeing like a river are gone for you, as is fucking your old friend "pete." i feel sorry you can't butt fuck him anymore. the old penis has withered away, huh old man. i know you type with "authority," and zeal, sitting stroking your softie while watching burnt kids. your day will come

How do you know how old I am?

[shoottokill]

Originally Posted by Kelly ↗

Where is the rule that states that?
And no i do not think i am better than any one so what a really pathetic ignorant thing to say.

I post countless threads here daily...countless and sometimes it is actually possible to do numerous things like forget child warning, even spell things wrong when providing a vast amount of stuff for a site. It happens. Get over it.

your right, there is no rule for it. i looked through the rules, and you are correct.
it's not a pathetic and ignorant thing as you say it is. i typed it because i was annoyed. i'm allowed to be annoyed i think, but i realize i shouldn't be typing that u don't follow rules, because u do. i mean you are the best contributor to this site, and i realize this. i know you are the top poster, and the most respected here....keep it up, but just know that kid stuff should have a warning....at least i think so