[RaNer]

She looks like she seen a ghost and he looks like he smoked too much and fell asleep while eating junk food.

[pa28Pilot]

Lmao the amount of guys in their 30s, 40s and beyond who would fuck a 17 year old hottie if given the chance - if you think otherwise, you're just delusional.

Nature makes girls fancy older guys, and guys fancy younger girls, it's just seen time and time again. Needless to say, I had my fun in my 20s - some of it may have, err, 'raised some eyebrows', but it was all 100% consensual and hot as fuck! Would I fuck a compos mentis 16 year old? Hell yeah! What about a 27 year old who wears floral dresses and sleeps with plush toys? No fucking way.

As far as biology and nature are concerned, if a girl is post puberty, it's totally natural for a guy to find them sexually attractive!

[Budd Dwyer]

Originally Posted by Simone ↗

I had my son when I was 19 years old, my (ex) husband was 18 - both legally adults + only a year apart. So what's your point? My son is nearly 21 years old now + I see him as a child, I cannot even comprehend how an adult would find a 17 year old CHILD sexually attractive. Just fucking sick.

No matter what you fucking say, 17 is a child. A man in his 30s has no business sticking his dick in a teenager.

Fuck all you vile perverts.

My point is a year doesn't make a difference and if you've stupid enough to breed at 19 you should shut the hell up

[Budd Dwyer]

Originally Posted by Simone ↗

I had my son when I was 19 years old, my (ex) husband was 18 - both legally adults + only a year apart. So what's your point? My son is nearly 21 years old now + I see him as a child, I cannot even comprehend how an adult would find a 17 year old CHILD sexually attractive. Just fucking sick.

No matter what you fucking say, 17 is a child. A man in his 30s has no business sticking his dick in a teenager.

Fuck all you vile perverts.

A woman shouldnt have kids at 19
Fuck all of you gypsies

[Budd Dwyer]

Originally Posted by Yoloman ↗

Simone: I am in my late 60s; my five year exclusive partner is 41. She wants to get married every day. Am I a pedeo?

According to her retarded stubborn logic, you're a monster
She will have a meltdown and will get banned eventually, don't worry.

[Budd Dwyer]

Originally Posted by Simone ↗

I had my son when I was 19 years old, my (ex) husband was 18 - both legally adults + only a year apart. So what's your point? My son is nearly 21 years old now + I see him as a child, I cannot even comprehend how an adult would find a 17 year old CHILD sexually attractive. Just fucking sick.

No matter what you fucking say, 17 is a child. A man in his 30s has no business sticking his dick in a teenager.

Fuck all you vile perverts.

Called me a pedo, yet I was almost solely responsible to extort Chris to finally ban pedovan

[Dodecahedron]

Originally Posted by William May ↗

Sorry, but PURE BS! A 17 year old is old enough to know if they want to fuck or not. That's what it comes down to.

12-13, you are right. But by 17, you will be lucky to find someone who's still a virgin. In fact, you'd probably be lucky to find a 15 year old who's a virgin. Just the hard facts. Sorry about reality.

So the concept of grooming doesn’t register with you then?

[Dodecahedron]

Originally Posted by pa28Pilot ↗

Lmao the amount of guys in their 30s, 40s and beyond who would fuck a 17 year old hottie if given the chance - if you think otherwise, you're just delusional.

Nature makes girls fancy older guys, and guys fancy younger girls, it's just seen time and time again. Needless to say, I had my fun in my 20s - some of it may have, err, 'raised some eyebrows', but it was all 100% consensual and hot as fuck! Would I fuck a compos mentis 16 year old? Hell yeah! What about a 27 year old who wears floral dresses and sleeps with plush toys? No fucking way.

As far as biology and nature are concerned, if a girl is post puberty, it's totally natural for a guy to find them sexually attractive!

Puberty doesn’t “end”. So what do you mean by post puberty? Cos some girls get their period and breast development at 10. It’s natural is it? Do is a favour and go hand yourself in.

[William May]

Originally Posted by Dodecahedron ↗

So the concept of grooming doesn’t register with you then?

If, by "Grooming", you mean a male approaching a female for sex, yes, that would be a pretty normal and natural part of the breeding imperative.

OH! "GROOMING"! Of course! How silly of me! If the girl is 17 years and 364 days old, it's "GROOMING"!

But if she's 17 years and 366 days old, it's normal natural sex!

I see the distinction there!

NOT!

"Grooming" is a mythical reimagining of natural human mating and selection, arbitrarily assigning certain values to things that don't even exist.

Girls WANT to have sex! Boys WANT to have sex! It is a biological imperative placed in our DNA through evolution!

Perhaps you could pass a law that forbids sex for ANYONE under the age of 30! Think how beneficial THAT would be!!
EVERY BRIDE WOULD BE A VIRGIN! Wouldn't THAT suit your goal?

You sound like the Taliban. YOU need to decide about everyone's behavior, and whether it's right or wrong, based on YOUR own thoughts.

It's almost like the Republicans efforts to ban drag shows. I assume they are doing this because they secretly think they might like going to them, and would wind up sucking some guy's weiner backstage.

Most everyone else (including ME) don't really give a crap about drag shows. They don't interest me. I don't care about them. But, I have NO interest in banning something that is of interest to other people, but not to me. Adults can make their own decisions (And will anyway, even if they are Trumpies secretly hanging out in gay sex clubs, which apparently is a pretty frequent occurrence!)

Perhaps you could turn your attention to supporting "Fappy The Dolphin" in his efforts to end heterosexual masturbation for ALL ages.

An admirable goal! Get on it, Tiger!

Once you master that, you can start making decisions about biological mating rituals next.

Consensual human behavior should never be anyone's business except the participants. If there is no coercion or force involved, then it doesn't matter.

You need to study "Transactional Analysis" about why people do the things they do. THEY DO THEM BECAUSE THEY WANT TO! That's all there is to it.

You can add on all the made-up theories and words that you want to. None of them make any difference, and none of them will EVER change fundamental human relations.

[Lizarrd]

If you want to leave a beautiful corpse, CO2 or Nitrogen asphyxiation is the way to go