[philovan]

Except for that tiny stain on her dress, the girl looks like she's taking a nap on the couch. I suppose a clean heart shot that stopped it's beating immediately would account for the small loss of blood.

[elove1018]

Now who will take care of the dog...poor thing

[Darkknight1]

Which sourch u use for pics

[jesse]

First thing I thought was I hope somebody got the dog! Seems I am not the only one.....

[murofhsirgo]

she's kinda cute

[Oswald2001]

The targets shouldn't have been thievin'.

Looks like somebody got tired of their sh*t.

Fair enough.

[chefbob09]

What a shithole

[GlassToTheArson]

Originally Posted by Vedderman ↗

This is why my contributions have dropped by more than 75% over the past few years.

More and more sites are watermarking their images, including many reliable sites that did not used to do so. We lose out on a LOT of content on this site due to the watermarking rules.

I have said many times before and will say again now that I loathe this rule and have for the two years that it has been in effect. I vaguely understand its purpose, but think it is poorly applied. I understand clearly why chris does not want watermarks for other gore/shock sites on here. But I do NOT understand (nor agree with) his hardline stance on removing the actual watermarks of the sites/photographers who take and post these images in the first place. Removing the watermarks is (in some locales) illegal and, in my opinion, very unethical.

Credit should be given to the people who are out there up to their balls in blood and brains to get these photos. How does it hurt THIS site if the Mexican or Brazilian photographer's watermark is visible? Or the watermark of the legitimate news agency that employs him?

Blah. I get on this soapbox once or twice a year because I think the rule is detrimental to this site and to the people who work to get these images. But whatever. Chris pays to keep the site running, so I believe in following his rules. I'm just putting out there that this site would see TWICE as many images if he'd limit the 'watermark restriction' to the short list of 'rival' gore sites instead of ALL watermarks in general.

Couldn't agree with you more

[Megamel29]

Originally Posted by deanmine ↗

the last pic.. did the guy fall on the pillow.. did the killers place it under him or ..i dont think he was killed in his sleep... look at his legs....

It looks like maybe he was flipped over?

[Spiffyfable]

The third one is kind of cute