[Lion-hearted Girl]

Originally Posted by gboy69 ↗

true



it is highly probable that whoever took the video has edited it, so it is likely they have other pieces of footage that prove it is theirs. however, unless the owner brings the proof of ownership and a request to remove it, then it will not have a chance of being removed

Agreed.

[Lion-hearted Girl]

Originally Posted by Vedderman ↗

I'm sorry, this is a 25-second cellphone-quality video with no watermarks, no copyrights posted, and all of the faces and identifying features censored out. How exactly is someone calling it their 'property'?

Personally, I don't care for the video and I don't believe it has any place in this thread, since no one dies in it, but I still find it ridiculous that someone claims to 'own' a video with no watermarks, copyrights, or faces in it.

Originally Posted by Vedderman ↗

No. You're wrong.

With no identifiable faces, no watermarks, and no listed copyrights, there is no fucking proof of ownership. Anyone can call it their 'property' and no one is in a position to dispute it because the video contains no verifiable features to establish ownership.

If the 'owner' wants to contact Chris with verifiable proof of ownership then fine. But the vid isn't likely to be taken down until such proof is provided, however much you may personally wish me to be wrong.

I know you enjoy trolling my posts in order to try and discredit everything I say, but the fact here is that you're fucking clueless and should keep your flapping gob shut. Ownership is not established simply because some anonymous tool on the internet wants to take credit for creating something.

I'm sorry but you are incorrect.

I actually work with copyright media as part of my profession. I create copyright materials as well as aquiring the rights to use other's copyright materials for commercial purposes. No piece of media requires "recognizable faces or watermarks" for someone to own the copyright.

Obviously in an online environment such as this, proving copyright and having a video removed is going to be virtually impossible unless it's a large company who is willing to pursue it further. But that was not what I was saying.

I'm not sure how you've gotten the idea that I "troll your posts", you need to calm that ego. You're not even a blip on my radar.

I saw you post something innacurate so I corrected you.

ETA: Copyright exists from the moment that a person creates the photo, film, graphic etc. Copyright does not need to be registered or "listed" as you seem to imply.

[makaluzo]

.

Karina after hanged:

.

PS. Enough for you to sweat from these "copyright"!
You take an example from Russian people - Russian people spit on all these "copyright".

[Lion-hearted Girl]

Originally Posted by makaluzo ↗

.

Karina after hanged:

.

PS. Enough for you to sweat from these "copyright"!
You take an example from Russian people - Russian people spit on all these "copyright".

OK

[laal]

I agree, the Internet does not give a shit mostly about copyright. Sites like Torrent and Pirate Bay exists, in fact. Haha

Anyway, additional pic of the Thai girl and a censored(unfortunately I can't find an uncensored version) pic of the drug user from Brazil in the coffin.

[trakk]

repost filter #1591 and #1600

[ropedoc]

Originally Posted by laal ↗

I agree, the Internet does not give a shit mostly about copyright. Sites like Torrent and Pirate Bay exists, in fact. Haha

Anyway, additional pic of the Thai girl and a censored(unfortunately I can't find an uncensored version) pic of the drug user from Brazil in the coffin.

Wow, the Brazilian pic reminds me of the stripper "Wendy" that was strung up by the cartel in her go go boots. Damn

[makaluzo]

.

Hanging girl:

.

[makaluzo]

.

Hanging suicide:

.

[bazoozoo_52]

New.