|
#173
●
07-24-2012, 10:46 PM
|
|
Re: Female With Severe Leg Trauma, Very Nasty
Personally I like the bush... And I'm betting that most of the negative comments towards the bush would be repealed if her leg wasn't turned inside out! Shame about the leg though |
|
#175
●
07-25-2012, 01:53 PM
|
|
Re: Female With Severe Leg Trauma, Very Nasty
I had heard the same story about it being a soldier, today I noticed her nails are painted and she is wearing jewelry which "is" permitted but not during operations...... 3-56. Soldiers may not wear these items when doing so would interfere with the performance of their duties or cause a safety problem. Soldiers may not be prohibited, however, from wearing religious apparel, articles or jewelry meeting the criteria of AR 670-1 simply because they are religious in nature if wear is permitted of similar items of a nonreligious nature. A specific example would be wearing a ring with a religious symbol. If the ring meets the uniform standards for jewelry and is not worn in a work area where rings are prohibited because of safety concerns, then wear is allowed and may not be prohibited simply because the ring bears a religious symbol. Someone in the military, please feel free to correct me if I'm wrong. |