|
#17
●
05-25-2015, 04:06 PM
| ||||||||
 My Rank: CORPORAL Poster Rank:1722 Male Join Date: Dec 2013 Posts: 309 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Quoted: 56 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Female Drugdealer Shot in a Bar
Did read it right that someone said that she had the box with those pouches of crack stuffed in her vagina ? That is pretty big vagina to hold that size of a box.. If its true
|
|
#18
●
05-25-2015, 04:37 PM
| ||||||||
 ★ Server Supporter ★ Poster Rank:436 Male Join Date: Apr 2010 Posts: 2,615
Contributions: 119
Mentioned: 7 Post(s) Quoted: 155 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Female Drugdealer Shot in a Bar
Not quite. One opinion is that she had the crack in the box, which was then stuck down in her shorts. The other is that the small packets were stuffed up into her vagina, and that the box is into the image merely to act as size comparison (this is quite usual - my daughter is a geologist, and whenever she makes an image in the field, she places a pencil or a ball pen to show the size). A ruler would seem more adequate in a forensic environment, nevertheless I have seen several examples like this one. Today I saw an article from one of the more serious blogs (boring because it never has any interesting images, but their stories are quoted everywhere). They tell the vagina version and show an image of the crack packets without the box. There is no absolutely conclusive argument other than the report from the medical examiner, and we are not likely to get that. But until something better comes up, I'll go with the most credible source, I have seen yet, the one I referred to above. |
I guess you never know, though. Definite disruption in the distribution chain one way or the other.
