[carkees]

^^^that's not a nice thing to say

[mart_knip]

Thanks Sadako! :o),for somw of us that dont have 50$for the book,here is a link to the torrent!!!

enjoy.....

EBOOK

http://thepiratebay.org/torrent/4978...Human_Cadavers

[GODREKR]

Originally Posted by RReaper ↗

I saw a documentary once about crucifixions and there to date has been no evidence found to prove they ever happend , Biblical myths.
Everything man has done has left traces throughout time and history that backs the theory up , crucifixions ,no preserved cross's nor nailing devices have ever been found.

The ankle bone of a crucified man excavated in a burial cave at Giv'at ha-Mivtar, northeast of Jerusalem. The original nail is still lodged in the bone, even though the man was crucified two thousand years ago.

Proof of the practice of crucifixion exists. It's proof that jesus was crucified, or even existed for that matter, that's lacking.

[legolasgreenleaf]

I absolutely love "Stiff", Shazza! I was just talking about it at work on Saturday. I really loved the part about Languille at the guillotine, here's an interesting article on that: http://www.executedtoday.com/2008/06...an-of-science/

[Sharon]

Originally Posted by eatonbeavers ↗

You are absolutely correct Shazza.
Inspite of what our friends documentory may have told him Crucifixion was a realitivily common form of punisment for those who had lost favor with the Romans. Many, Many,Many people were Crucified before Jesus and many ,many after him as well.
As far as no physical eveidence I think his source was wrong on that as well. While I mayself have not seen in person artifacts from Crucifixion, while in college we saw photos of such artifacts in Art history and World civ class.
As for a means of dying, feet nialed feet not nailed
either way you die , either way you suffer, either way same end result.
As for it being a Myth it is not, the people of times past killed by it are not , nor is Jesus
Great original reply by you Shazza Your a good kid

Thank you so much for your great response! That's encouraging and has made me happy

[Sharon]

Originally Posted by legolasgreenleaf ↗

I absolutely love "Stiff", Shazza! I was just talking about it at work on Saturday. I really loved the part about Languille at the guillotine, here's an interesting article on that: http://www.executedtoday.com/2008/06...an-of-science/

I'm always on about it too Thanks for the link. I've posted some great early guillotene images in this section and I think he may be on one of them. Just use 'guillotene' as a keyword in Search Forum

[Sharon]

Originally Posted by GØÐRËKR ↗

The ankle bone of a crucified man excavated in a burial cave at Giv'at ha-Mivtar, northeast of Jerusalem. The original nail is still lodged in the bone, even though the man was crucified two thousand years ago.

Proof of the practice of crucifixion exists. It's proof that jesus was crucified, or even existed for that matter, that's lacking.

Fair answer and great pics Rekr. Jesus has had more historical documentation than Julius Caesar yet we have no trouble beleiving in Caesar

[Sharon]

Originally Posted by The Last Nephilim ↗

Crucifying cadavers in an attempt to prove the shroud of turin is real seems a bit extreme.

They were seeing if the blood pattern from the cadaver's crucifixion wounds could produce a stain resembling the shroud's on the cloth they subsequently wrapped it in. Very interesting!

[GODREKR]

Originally Posted by Shazza ↗

Fair answer and great pics Rekr. Jesus has had more historical documentation than Julius Caesar yet we have no trouble beleiving in Caesar

If by historical documentation you mean the bible, then I rest my case. That's the difference between "believing in" Ceasar and proving he existed.

[Sharon]

Originally Posted by GØÐRËKR ↗

If by historical documentation you mean the bible, then I rest my case. That's the difference between "believing in" Ceasar and proving he existed.

There's archaelogical, geographical, Roman & Jewish council and synagogue records of him too.

It's all down to faith, interpretation, etc, etc, whatever we feel about things. Proof isn't always what we want it to be.

The Bible isn't all hocus-pocus bollocks as people think. It contains references to may events at the time that really occured, Caesar himself is in it, it is many books together ranging from historical accounts to imagery, dreams and even songs. Some of the events are shocking reading but were events

Anyway Rekr, I know where you stand on all this so we'll rest the case