[Faust]

Looks like the third day of destroying Ukrainian infrastructure was a success as well. My guess is this will continue until the entire country is crippled and the citizens have fled. (Could take another month though) After that it Ukraine will destroy the nuclear plant and Russia will show some restrained use of nuclear weapons; with western supplied weapons essentially a dirty bomb was created so they will be able to sell it so China like that I think. People in here will say the russia destroyed the plant, bridge and Nord stream on their own, yet they cheered when they initially were destroyed. No cheering over the nuclear power plant yet as this on has not been really attacked at this point

[SDI]

Originally Posted by Faust ↗

Looks like the third day of destroying Ukrainian infrastructure was a success as well. My guess is this will continue until the entire country is crippled and the citizens have fled. (Could take another month though) After that it Ukraine will destroy the nuclear plant and Russia will show some restrained use of nuclear weapons; with western supplied weapons essentially a dirty bomb was created so they will be able to sell it so China like that I think. People in here will say the russia destroyed the plant, bridge and Nord stream on their own, yet they cheered when they initially were destroyed. No cheering over the nuclear power plant yet as this on has not been really attacked at this point

So far Air Power only proved decisive, when mass precision strikes directly cripple enemy military capabilities... e.g. Six Days War, Yom Kippur War, Gulf Wars.

Just attacking civilians and their infrastructure simply isn't a factor. It never worked out to decide the outcome of a given war. See North Korea or Vietnam....US bombed entire countries into rubble without direct impact for the outcome of the war. Its just stiffening resistance and makes people hate the agressors even more, which is good for morale. As long as the military and lines of supply remain intact, it might even help the defender.

Russia clearly shouldn't waste their remaining smart weapons for civilian targets. Especially since its rumoured they have difficulties to produce new ones while under sanctions. They should better focus to take our fuel + ammo depots and enemy troops.

[Faust]

Originally Posted by SDI ↗

So far Air Power only proved decisive, when mass precision strikes directly cripple enemy military capabilities... e.g. Six Days War, Yom Kippur War, Gulf Wars.

Just attacking civilians and their infrastructure simply isn't a factor. It never worked out to decide the outcome of a given war. See North Korea or Vietnam....US bombed entire countries into rubble without direct impact for the outcome of the war. Its just stiffening resistance and makes people hate the agressors even more, which is good for morale. As long as the military and lines of supply remain intact, it might even help the defender.

Russia clearly shouldn't waste their remaining smart weapons for civilian targets. Especially since its rumoured they have difficulties to produce new ones while under sanctions. They should better focus to take our fuel + ammo depots and enemy troops.

While I agree (I don’t think it is allowed to mention earlier conflicts as some people get triggered by that and issue reports to moderators), I believe they already crippled the Ukrainian army to the point where the planned invasions of Crimea and the DPR are not possible without nato charity.

People will say that ukraine has been winning for months, or since the conflict really, but in reality they have literally lost thousands of tanks, airplanes, helicopters, and so on. Not to mention enough ammunition to level both Crimea and the DPR 5 times over.

They have not been exterminated completely obviously, but yeah, the knife that cuts the slowest.. and so on.

Still I think they are going to make the civilians leave and after that it’s gloves off

[duntez]

ente17

Not really, especially after 20 years in US, 10 of which in Miami than you put on a top of that Bidens office with the general in a skirt. Go figure

But he is Chechen and those guys are not from Miami. In the end, if this speech was suitable for this platoon, than I guess who cares, especially if that put their mind into fighting mode. If it didn’t, well then, those were the wrong words I guess

[WhiskeyOutpost]

Originally Posted by SDI ↗

So far Air Power only proved decisive, when mass precision strikes directly cripple enemy military capabilities... e.g. Six Days War, Yom Kippur War, Gulf Wars.

Just attacking civilians and their infrastructure simply isn't a factor. It never worked out to decide the outcome of a given war. See North Korea or Vietnam....US bombed entire countries into rubble without direct impact for the outcome of the war. Its just stiffening resistance and makes people hate the agressors even more, which is good for morale. As long as the military and lines of supply remain intact, it might even help the defender.

Russia clearly shouldn't waste their remaining smart weapons for civilian targets. Especially since its rumoured they have difficulties to produce new ones while under sanctions. They should better focus to take our fuel + ammo depots and enemy troops.

Agreed. And it's not "rumored" that they're having issues with manufacturing/repair/refurbishing more modern equipment. They are now pulling their T-62 turrets and sending them to depot for refurb. Mothballed shit that's been sitting in storage for decades. That's a huge sign that Russia does not have the ability to continue this.

[ente17]

Originally Posted by duntez ↗

ente17

Not really, especially after 20 years in US, 10 of which in Miami than you put on a top of that Bidens office with the general in a skirt. Go figure

But he is Chechen and those guys are not from Miami. In the end, if this speech was suitable for this platoon, than I guess who cares, especially if that put their mind into fighting mode. If it didn’t, well then, those were the wrong words I guess

At some point you will have to use the provided doll to indicate where the UA doctor touched you Duntez.

[duntez]

Originally Posted by ente17 ↗

At some point you will have to use the provided doll to indicate where the UA doctor touched you Duntez.

I don’t get it. Maybe there is a “saying” or something. But in UA or Rus your msg just dosnt make any sense

[Rfneimad]

Originally Posted by duntez ↗

I don’t get it. Maybe there is a “saying” or something. But in UA or Rus your msg just dosnt make any sense

It's a joke referencing how victims of child abuse are interviewed by the authorities. They use a doll to make it easier, they tell the child to point to the part of the doll where the perpetrator touched them inappropriately.

[Rfneimad]

I'm gonna forward Russian sided videos in this here telegram
https://t.me/+znQhccmZKCZjYmEx

[duntez]

Originally Posted by Rfneimad ↗

It's a joke referencing how victims of child abuse are interviewed by the authorities. They use a doll to make it easier, they tell the child to point to the part of the doll where the perpetrator touched them inappropriately.

Than it doesn't make any sense what so ever. He asked me If I get goose bumps from that speech and I said no and explained my self that after 20 years I dont share this gay hate. Than I went on to explaining why he said what he said. Now how you can possibly connect my answer with his response