[Stefan800]

Originally Posted by Faust ↗

The seperatist regions voted 8 years ago to not be part of Ukraine anymore. This is reported by western media:

https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...onetsk-luhansk


Then Ukraine wages actual war against those regions. 16.000 dead.

Now they are voting again in those regions, and people actually want to believe the remaining people would vote for a government that waged war against them, killed their citizens and also threatens them?

Let that sink in. No amount of western propaganda will ever change those facts, sorry to all western media and reporters. In less than 10 years you will be all writing how we have to kill Ukrainians as the ultranationalists have taken over

Maybe, just maybe, the voting 8 years ago was staged like the voting now?

[Faust]

Originally Posted by Stefan800 ↗

Maybe, just maybe, the voting 8 years ago was staged like the voting now?

I understand why you would want to believe that, and that is okay!

It’s also possible there never even was a civil war over there. I mean there is videos and western journalists reporting over the years, even Ukraine claiming 16.000 lives lost in the civil war. But maybe, just maybe, that all never happened?

Maybe there is not a majority of ethnic Russian living there at the moment. Maybe the Ukrainian non-seperatists didn’t leave over the past 8 years. Maybe Ukraine didn’t wage war against the remaining population for 8 years?

Maybe, just maybe, the people living there just love being part of Ukraine even though the speak Russian?
That could be true. Anything is possible you are correct!

[pastinho]

[WhiskeyOutpost]

Originally Posted by pastinho ↗

Yup, pretty much. One moment all fire and brimstone and then when the cards are on the table and it's their turn, no war plz I don't wanna die!

[Faust]

Originally Posted by Faust ↗

https://www.rt.com/russia/563482-rt-...elled-kherson/

He shouldn’t have done that

Personally I think that they targeted the military and the guy voting against ukraine is just a nice bonus (to them at least)

This is why RT.com is the best; they also mention that the military was at the hotel a day before and that because of that the hotel could have been a potential target.

If RT.com were CNN.com they would have not mentioned that and completely try to frame it as an attack on journalists or some bullshit.

So yeah, RT journalists nearly got killed in the attack, and yet still they report ALL the facts.

[WhiskeyOutpost]

Originally Posted by Faust ↗

This is why RT.com is the best; they also mention that the military was at the hotel a day before and that because of that the hotel could have been a potential target.

If RT.com were CNN.com they would have not mentioned that and completely try to frame it as an attack on journalists or some bullshit.

So yeah, RT journalists nearly got killed in the attack, and yet still they report ALL the facts.

The "facts" are what Russia want them to be.

[AnonX93]

Originally Posted by Faust ↗

This is why RT.com is the best; they also mention that the military was at the hotel a day before and that because of that the hotel could have been a potential target.

If RT.com were CNN.com they would have not mentioned that and completely try to frame it as an attack on journalists or some bullshit.

So yeah, RT journalists nearly got killed in the attack, and yet still they report ALL the facts.

Bro shut the fuck up. That’s literally state sponsored media.

[WonderMomma]

Yeah this is just getting laughable at this point.

[AnonX93]

Faust gets mad if anyone quotes CNN but then seriously quotes RT. This guy is just trolling. Should get banned or warned.

[WonderMomma]

Well he was banned for 4-5 days until this new thread was created. I'm not sure his time away was enough but that is not up to me. Repeated, obsessive and incessant rambling of hypocritical, misleading information isn't a violation of the rules I don't think. I might just have to use the "ignore" function of this site for the first time ever in 11 years.