[Faust]

Originally Posted by duntez ↗

ok ok jumped on me like a dogs attacked a bone I only guessed that ur rusophob just by judging your posts here.

Who are you talking to??

[duntez]

Originally Posted by Faust ↗

Who are you talking to??

WO and pastinho

[WonderMomma]

Originally Posted by duntez ↗

Logic here is simple- RT by propaganding western propaganda is propaganda too

All of it has become propaganda.

Sadly, there was once upon a time when the news, was just the news. The facts were reported concisely and that was it. I remember that time clearly.

But it's all become glorified talk shows about some of the most serious things going on in the world. Television personalities making so much money for themselves and the networks/organization. It has influence, money, power, politics and is all, like I said already, a tool to control the masses. A giant brainwashing machine.

The fact that its mostly this way makes it difficult to trust any of them. And again for the record, Twitter, Telegram, Instagram, etc. are all a part of it. Social media as a whole has become an integral part of the brain washing machine.

RT, or any government run news organization is definitely not trustworthy. Neither are any that are owned or run by m/billionaires or oligarchs. The fact that anyone finds them the most trustworthy source out there is just telling and explains everything.

I think I've addressed this issue so many times in here already that I would like to officially say it's asked and answered. But as usual, someone in here seems obsessed with getting his anti-western hate campaign across ad nauseam.

[WhiskeyOutpost]

I remember that time, for the most part. What really irks me is how editorials and opinions are presented as indisputable facts and if you disagree then "you're a part of the problem" from that political camp of the spectrum.

[WonderMomma]

Originally Posted by Faust ↗

did they provide any examples as to when rt.com reported lies duntez?
(I am too lazy to log out and read everybody's posts)

Source: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/rt-news/

Failed Fact Checks for RT

While RT Bemoans Ukrainian Propaganda, it is Russians who Feel the Disinfo Fallout : https://www.polygraph.info/a/rt-russ...k/6741953.html

RT: OPCW Got its Chemical Weapons Samples from ‘Jihadists’:
https://www.polygraph.info/a/rt-call...s/6741830.html

RT Distorts Disinformation Detective’s Guide to Russian Trolls:
https://www.polygraph.info/a/rt-misr...r/6741795.html

RT’s FARA examined. Part I:
https://www.polygraph.info/a/rt-fara...k/6741690.html

RT: U.S. Special Envoy Says Russia Seeks to 'Freeze' Conflict in Eastern Ukraine:
https://www.polygraph.info/a/russia-...e/6741663.html

“Melting statues to create modern art is a sign America hates its own history & no different from ISIS destroying Palmyra.”:
https://www.polygraph.info/a/fact-ch...s/6743184.html

Fact Check: Did Russian Ka-52 Destroy Ukraine Barge Near Nuclear Plant?:
https://www.newsweek.com/fact-check-...-plant-1743684

[duntez]

Originally Posted by WonderMomma ↗

Source: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/rt-news/

Failed Fact Checks for RT

While RT Bemoans Ukrainian Propaganda, it is Russians who Feel the Disinfo Fallout : https://www.polygraph.info/a/rt-russ...k/6741953.html

RT: OPCW Got its Chemical Weapons Samples from ‘Jihadists’:
https://www.polygraph.info/a/rt-call...s/6741830.html

RT Distorts Disinformation Detective’s Guide to Russian Trolls:
https://www.polygraph.info/a/rt-misr...r/6741795.html

RT’s FARA examined. Part I:
https://www.polygraph.info/a/rt-fara...k/6741690.html

RT: U.S. Special Envoy Says Russia Seeks to 'Freeze' Conflict in Eastern Ukraine:
https://www.polygraph.info/a/russia-...e/6741663.html

“Melting statues to create modern art is a sign America hates its own history & no different from ISIS destroying Palmyra.”:
https://www.polygraph.info/a/fact-ch...s/6743184.html

Fact Check: Did Russian Ka-52 Destroy Ukraine Barge Near Nuclear Plant?:
https://www.newsweek.com/fact-check-...-plant-1743684

Just to clear something up. Polygraph.info owned by Voice of America and Voice of America is a state owned organization located in DC. So we can cancel out everything they say I assume because its a propaganda, correct? or we r gonna double standard this shit

[WonderMomma]

Originally Posted by duntez ↗

Just to clear something up. Polygraph.info owned by Voice of America and Voice of America is a state owned organization located in DC. So we can cancel out everything they say I assume because its a propaganda, correct? or we r gonna double standard this shit

Well the people doing rating aren't state owned.

About Media Bias / Fact Check
Founded in 2015, Media Bias/Fact Check (MBFC) is an independent website that has promoted awareness of media bias and misinformation by rating the bias, factual accuracy, and credibility of media sources, large and small. Media Bias/Fact Check relies on human evaluators to determine the bias of media sources and the level of overall factual reporting through a combination of objective measures and subjective analysis using our stated methodology.

Dave Van Zandt is the founder and primary editor for sources. He is assisted by a collective of volunteers and paid contractors who provide research for many sources listed on these pages. Finally, MBFC also provides occasional fact checks and original articles on media bias and publishes daily curated fact-checks from around the world.

Mission
The mission of MBFC is to educate the public on media bias and deceptive news practices. We inspire action and a rejection of overtly biased media resulting in a return to an era of straightforward fact-based news reporting. Our purpose is to give people the resources and tools needed to understand the bias and credibility of the sources they consume.

Funding
Funding for Media Bias/Fact Check comes from reader donations, third-party advertising, and membership subscriptions. We use third-party advertising to prevent influence and bias, as we do not select the ads you see displayed. Ads are generated based on your search history, cookies, and the current web page content you are viewing. See details on funding.

Credibility
The credibility of a website/media source is not determined by who owns them but rather by its track record. Everybody starts as a beginner and, through experience, becomes an authority in their field. MBFC is no different. Over the last 7+ years, we have proven to be a trusted authority on the rating of bias and the credibility of media sources. For example, MBFC is trusted by major media outlets and IFCN fact-checkers. This is evidenced by frequently being referenced by sources such as USA Today, Reuters Fact Check, Science Feedback, Washington Post, and NPR, among dozens of others. We are also frequently used as a resource in libraries, high schools, and universities across the United States.

Media Bias/Fact Check has also been used as a resource for research by the University of Michigan and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Further, we have been utilized by numerous print books such as these:

The Rise of the Alt-Right
Fake News, Propaganda, and Plain Old Lies: Find Trustworthy Information in the Digital Age
Raising Humans in a Digital World
Everyday Media Literacy An Analog Guide for Your Digital Life
Hate Groups and Extremist Organizations in America: An Encyclopedia
Finally, MBFC scored a perfect 100/100 rating by Newsguard, which rates the credibility of Media Sources. We believe it is significant that a competitor gave us this score.

[duntez]

Originally Posted by WonderMomma ↗

Well the people doing rating aren't state owned.

what rating? im talking about polygraph.info investigations on RT tweets or w/e. They are state owned.

[Faust]

Started from the bottom:

https://www.newsweek.com/fact-check-...-plant-1743684

This is the best they come up with?
Not a single mention of rt.com

[Faust]

Second one:
https://www.polygraph.info/a/fact-ch...s/6743184.html

Opinion, but:

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news...ioters-on-how/