|
#13
●
01-17-2023, 11:43 AM
| ||||||||
| My Rank: CORPORAL Poster Rank:1523 Join Date: Oct 2011 Posts: 372 Mentioned: 1 Post(s) Quoted: 279 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Nuclear Escalation Scenario
This is a suicide bomber tactic - "I will die but people around will die too". It is pointless, doesn't prove anything, doesn't win anything and everybody loses. Just doesn't make any sense.
|
|
#15
●
01-18-2023, 07:31 AM
|
|
Re: Nuclear Escalation Scenario
That's cute, but I can't trust somebody who cannot pronounce "nuclear" correctly. In addition, the most devastating attacks will be on the central US or the southeastern board because there's a massive buildup of anti-missile defenses around the west coast (military bases) and in the vicinity of D.C. (for obvious reasons). The inner US is reliant on its size and mountains for defense from attack, but a flyover through Canada or Mexico of an ICBM (as long as it avoids the bases through the New Mexico, Arizona and Nevada region) would likely hit whatever target its aimed at. It's honestly surprising how little defense there is in the midwest, and it's unlikely Trudeau would do anything to help stop an ICBM doing a flyer over Canadia. At the very least, Russia could start with Minneapolis/St Paul because these shithole cities have become a festering hellhole. |
|
#17
●
02-04-2023, 09:41 PM
|
|
Re: Nuclear Escalation Scenario
Would be interested in the rest of the series/parts In case you haven't noticed/watched the video, a MAD scenario only happens with s counter attack, currently the US would win this simply because of time/better targeting, even if Russia launched a few |
|
#20
●
02-19-2023, 06:01 PM
|
|
Re: Nuclear Escalation Scenario
I think the first shot will be a military target, China attacking a US carrier battle group near the South China Sea. With an immediate warning that retalliation will be met by Russian and Chinese nuclear strikes on the US mainland. |