|
#202
●
03-21-2024, 09:19 PM
|
|
Re: ISRAEL/PALESTINE Conflict Discussion Thread IV (2024)
I'm thinking to bring a quicker end to this gaza conflict, the IDF doesn't have to do anything; just sit back in lawn chairs with a few cases of kosher cold ones, and enjoy the spectacle and the carnage of pallys killing each other |
|
#203
●
03-22-2024, 12:01 AM
|
|
Re: ISRAEL/PALESTINE Conflict Discussion Thread IV (2024)
I noticed that when HAMAS militants move in groups transporting weapons, returning from harassing IDF or throwing Molotov cocktails, they stay close together instead of spreading out to minimize casualties if they take a hit from hellfires or a sniper hidden in the knoll. Not very bright of course but they are arabs using arab tactics and it's why they lost NINE straight wars against the jews despite arab nations having a MUCH higher bean count, and why their own intellectuals and religious leaders since the late 19th century are embarrassed by them and call them "complacent non-entities". It's a good thing they're not the ones wearing uniforms otherwise we'd see too many of these videos |
|
#204
●
03-22-2024, 10:40 AM
|
|
Re: ISRAEL/PALESTINE Conflict Discussion Thread IV (2024)
I really hope we get IDF Apache videos of the conflict. We need to see another classic for the ages like the "Peaceful Iraqi Farmers Murdered by American Soldiers!" masterpiece from that war arabs lost against the west so spectacularly way back when |
|
#205
●
03-22-2024, 03:55 PM
| ||||||||
| So Fucking Banned Poster Rank:1115 i have a penis Join Date: Jun 2023 Posts: 589 Mentioned: 2 Post(s) Quoted: 310 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: ISRAEL/PALESTINE Conflict Discussion Thread IV (2024)
wow that's a lot of bullshit i didn't read, get back to your IDF circle jerk
|
|
#207
●
03-22-2024, 05:24 PM
|
|
Re: ISRAEL/PALESTINE Conflict Discussion Thread IV (2024)
I actually laughed out loud when I saw some deluded HAMAS toy soldier on Twitter or WhatsApp or something say on October 7th or the day after something like, "We fought Israel with honor as real combatants, with no deaths of innocents, one on one on the battlefield, and we held our own!" |
|
#208
●
03-22-2024, 06:46 PM
| ||||||||
| My Rank: LANCE CORPORAL Poster Rank:2389 Join Date: Feb 2022 Posts: 189 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Quoted: 174 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: ISRAEL/PALESTINE Conflict Discussion Thread IV (2024)
The statements you've mentioned are misinterpretations or misrepresentations of Jewish texts and teachings. The Talmud, a central text in Jewish religious scholarship, is a complex and vast compilation of discussions, laws, and ethics covering a wide range of topics. It's written in a mix of Hebrew and Aramaic and consists of the Mishnah (oral laws) and the Gemara (commentary on the Mishnah), developed between the 3rd and 6th centuries CE. 1. Sanhedrin 59a: This text discusses the spiritual and legal status of humans and animals, as well as the responsibilities of Jews and non-Jews under Jewish law. The claim that it states "Murdering Goyim is like killing a wild animal" is a gross misinterpretation. Jewish law holds the sanctity of human life in high esteem and does not advocate for violence against non-Jews. 2. Abodah Zara 26b: This part of the Talmud deals with regulations concerning interactions between Jews and non-Jews, especially in the context of idolatry and the social and religious challenges it posed in ancient times. The quote "Even the best of the Gentiles should be killed" does not reflect the content or spirit of the discussions in Abodah Zara. Jewish teachings emphasize peace, kindness, and justice for all people. 3. The repetition of Sanhedrin 59a: Regarding a non-Jew studying the Talmud, the discussions are more nuanced than suggested. The Talmud does discuss the concept of non-Jews engaging with Jewish law, but the context is complex and related to concerns about misunderstanding, misapplication, or misuse of sacred texts, not a blanket condemnation to death. The term "goyim" simply means "nations" in Hebrew and, in many contexts, refers to non-Jewish people without a derogatory connotation. Misinterpretations like these can stem from translations out of context, a lack of understanding of the Talmud's argumentative and dialectical style, or deliberate misrepresentation. So you sir are have no idea what you are talking about! |
|
#209
●
03-22-2024, 06:49 PM
| ||||||||
| My Rank: LANCE CORPORAL Poster Rank:2389 Join Date: Feb 2022 Posts: 189 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Quoted: 174 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: ISRAEL/PALESTINE Conflict Discussion Thread IV (2024)
1. Yebamoth 11b: This passage is part of the Talmud, which contains discussions on a wide range of Jewish law and ethics, including marriage and relationships. The text you've referenced is often grossly taken out of context. It discusses the legal implications of marriage contracts and the age of eligibility for marriage, not endorsing or encouraging such behavior. The Talmud reflects historical contexts and legal theoretical discussion rather than promoting modern practices or ethics in these areas. 2. Schabouth Hag. 6d: The Talmud does discuss oaths and their implications, including when one is obligated to fulfill an oath and when one might not be. However, the ethical teachings of Judaism, including those found in the Talmud, emphasize honesty and integrity. The notion of deceitfully using oaths would be in direct contradiction to the spirit of Jewish ethics and law, which values truthfulness and forbids deceit. 3. Hilkkoth Akum X1: "Hilchot Akum" refers to laws relating to non-Jews in the Mishneh Torah, a comprehensive code of Jewish law compiled by Maimonides (Rambam) in the 12th century. However, your quotes do not accurately reflect the content or spirit of Maimonides' work. Maimonides himself wrote extensively on the importance of compassion and respect towards all human beings, regardless of their faith. Misinterpretations of these texts often ignore the context, the complexity of the legal discussion, and the overall teachings of Judaism regarding kindness and the sanctity of life. Regarding mercy and saving lives: Jewish law places a supreme value on preserving human life (Pikuach Nefesh). This principle overrides almost all other religious commands; saving a life is paramount and does not discriminate between Jews and non-Jews. The misquoted texts and interpretations suggesting otherwise do not align with the foundational values of Judaism. |