#1
|
Large Crawler Crane Lifting Viaduct Section Goes Wrong
Northern Italy. 9 May 2017. A crane, owned by Vernazza, was rigged with a back mast and suspended superlift counterweight was lifting a large section of a new viaduct at the Arcisate Stabio railway yards, near Varese when it appeared to the rear of the tracks came off the ground and after seeming be on the point of balance for a while before it finally lost stability and overturned dumping its load. The operator managed to jump clear as the crane went over and is uninjured and that no one else was caught up in the incident. |
The Following 21 Users Say Thank You to kellyhound For This Useful Post: | ||
AngelAssassin, Azimuth, bannedinamerica, bigtee, Cancun78, casualsurfer96psi, Desert Rat, Dreary, friv0l0us, FunkPumpkin, GiJoe7898, iridopelma, juboaku, lecsee, Lil Stinker, Mr.NoCredit, Necrotic Bowel, Ninjavandal, RestInPepperoni, REVZZYBAN, William May |
#2
| ||||||||
♚ Legacy Gold Member ♚ Poster Rank:109 Male Join Date: Nov 2009 Mentioned: 4 Post(s) Quoted: 3861 Post(s)
| ||||||||
Re: Large Crawler Crane Lifting Viaduct Section Goes Wrong
As long as nobody got hurt, it's just entertaining. (The ancient Romans used to do this, without any crane, and they never dropped their viaducts.) |
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to William May For This Useful Post: | ||
AngelAssassin, Anna Kay, burrrrr1991, FunkPumpkin, kellyhound, LadyKnight7891, Mr.NoCredit |
#3
|
Re: Large Crawler Crane Lifting Viaduct Section Goes Wrong
Show off.
|
#4
|
Re: Large Crawler Crane Lifting Viaduct Section Goes Wrong
Never heard that much wailing over a crushed person, lol. Loss of $$$ tho', different story.
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to emarieu For This Useful Post: | ||
AngelAssassin, JPL |
#5
|
Re: Large Crawler Crane Lifting Viaduct Section Goes Wrong
Seems to me they didn't have quite enough counterbalance and/or the load was much too heavy for the crane.
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to AceGoober For This Useful Post: | ||
AngelAssassin, burrrrr1991, Mr Sparkle |
The Following Users Say Fuck Off To This Post By AceGoober: | ||
GiJoe7898 |
#6
|
Re: Large Crawler Crane Lifting Viaduct Section Goes Wrong
I don't know the math involved, but just looking at that, my gut says the counterweight is much too small. Apparently I'm right. ![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to vulturedoors For This Useful Post: | ||
AngelAssassin |
The Following Users Say Fuck Off To This Post By vulturedoors: | ||
GiJoe7898 |
#7
|
Re: Large Crawler Crane Lifting Viaduct Section Goes Wrong
They didn't give themselves any room to raise the counterweight and/or lower the boom it was on.
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Bleed For This Useful Post: | ||
AngelAssassin |
#8
| ||||||||
My Rank: PRIVATE FIRST CLASS Poster Rank:4731 Join Date: Jan 2013 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Quoted: 1 Post(s)
| ||||||||
Re: Large Crawler Crane Lifting Viaduct Section Goes Wrong
That was an impressive catastrophic failure to be able to see happen. I rewatched the video several times to see all the nuances and was specifically looking for the operator whom I saw barely dodging falling debris. Impressive indeed.
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to tekshogun For This Useful Post: | ||
AngelAssassin, Cancun78, Helicocker |
#9
|
Re: Large Crawler Crane Lifting Viaduct Section Goes Wrong
mama mia!!! ![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to commondenom For This Useful Post: | ||
burrrrr1991 |
#10
| |
Re: Large Crawler Crane Lifting Viaduct Section Goes Wrong
Quote:
Somebody has obviously fucked up the calculations for this lift. There should be a 50% safety margin for the whole operation. |
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to King Herald For This Useful Post: | ||
AngelAssassin, GiJoe7898 |