JavaScript and Cookies are required to view this site. Please enable both in your browser settings.
Large Crawler Crane Lifting Viaduct Section Goes Wrong

Go Back  

Large Crawler Crane Lifting Viaduct Section Goes Wrong 

Current Rating:

Join NowJoin Now
 
  #1  
Old 05-15-2017, 02:10 AM
kellyhound's Avatar
kellyhound
Online
✝Mudderator from Hell✝
Poster Rank:11
e-mail
Join Date: Oct 2006
Contributions: 817
 
Mentioned: 442 Post(s)
Quoted: 9044 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
18/20 20/20
Today Posts
11/11 ssss88245
Large Crawler Crane Lifting Viaduct Section Goes Wrong

Northern Italy. 9 May 2017.

A crane, owned by Vernazza, was rigged with a back mast and suspended superlift counterweight was lifting a large section of a new viaduct at the Arcisate Stabio railway yards, near Varese when it appeared to the rear of the tracks came off the ground and after seeming be on the point of balance for a while before it finally lost stability and overturned dumping its load.

The operator managed to jump clear as the crane went over and is uninjured and that no one else was caught up in the incident.
Test
Picture and Video Clip Stats.
File Type: mp4 Largecrawlercrane.mp4 (8.32 MB , 2387 views)
Reply With Quote
The Following 21 Users Say Thank You to kellyhound For This Useful Post:
AngelAssassin, Azimuth, bannedinamerica, bigtee, Cancun78, casualsurfer96psi, Desert Rat, Dreary, friv0l0us, FunkPumpkin, GiJoe7898, iridopelma, juboaku, lecsee, Lil Stinker, Mr.NoCredit, Necrotic Bowel, Ninjavandal, RestInPepperoni, REVZZYBAN, William May
  #2  
Old 05-15-2017, 09:56 AM
William May
Offline:
♚ Legacy Gold Member ♚
Poster Rank:109
Male
Join Date: Nov 2009
 
Mentioned: 4 Post(s)
Quoted: 3861 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
13/20 17/20
Today Posts
0/11 ssss13845
Re: Large Crawler Crane Lifting Viaduct Section Goes Wrong

As long as nobody got hurt, it's just entertaining.

(The ancient Romans used to do this, without any crane, and they never dropped their viaducts.)
Reply With Quote
The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to William May For This Useful Post:
AngelAssassin, Anna Kay, burrrrr1991, FunkPumpkin, kellyhound, LadyKnight7891, Mr.NoCredit
  #3  
Old 05-16-2017, 04:48 AM
Necrotic Bowel's Avatar
Emperor of Uranus
Poster Rank:38
I identify as kitchen-ware
Join Date: Jan 2017
 
Mentioned: 20 Post(s)
Quoted: 19219 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
17/20 9/20
Today Posts
11/11 ssss37808
Re: Large Crawler Crane Lifting Viaduct Section Goes Wrong

Show off.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 05-17-2017, 09:30 PM
emarieu's Avatar
emarieu
Offline:
My Rank: LANCE CORPORAL
Poster Rank:2061
Female
Join Date: Jan 2013
 
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 37 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 14/20
Today Posts
0/11 ssssss229
Re: Large Crawler Crane Lifting Viaduct Section Goes Wrong

Never heard that much wailing over a crushed person, lol. Loss of $$$ tho', different story.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to emarieu For This Useful Post:
AngelAssassin, JPL
  #5  
Old 05-18-2017, 07:36 AM
AceGoober's Avatar
AceGoober
Offline:
My Rank: FIRST SERGEANT
Poster Rank:394
Male
Join Date: Jul 2013
Contributions: 1
 
Mentioned: 9 Post(s)
Quoted: 573 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 13/20
Today Posts
0/11 sssss3008
Re: Large Crawler Crane Lifting Viaduct Section Goes Wrong

Seems to me they didn't have quite enough counterbalance and/or the load was much too heavy for the crane.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to AceGoober For This Useful Post:
AngelAssassin, burrrrr1991, Mr Sparkle
The Following Users Say Fuck Off To This Post By AceGoober:
GiJoe7898
  #6  
Old 05-23-2017, 12:35 AM
vulturedoors's Avatar
vulturedoors
Offline:
♚ Legacy Gold Member ♚
Poster Rank:936
Female
Join Date: Jan 2009
 
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 83 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
1/20 18/20
Today Posts
0/11 ssssss763
Re: Large Crawler Crane Lifting Viaduct Section Goes Wrong

I don't know the math involved, but just looking at that, my gut says the counterweight is much too small. Apparently I'm right.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to vulturedoors For This Useful Post:
AngelAssassin
The Following Users Say Fuck Off To This Post By vulturedoors:
GiJoe7898
  #7  
Old 05-24-2017, 11:11 PM
Bleed's Avatar
Bleed
Offline:
♚ Legacy Gold Member ♚
Poster Rank:252
Join Date: Dec 2009
Contributions: 8
 
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Quoted: 1151 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
3/20 17/20
Today Posts
1/11 sssss5418
Re: Large Crawler Crane Lifting Viaduct Section Goes Wrong

They didn't give themselves any room to raise the counterweight and/or lower the boom it was on.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bleed For This Useful Post:
AngelAssassin
  #8  
Old 05-30-2017, 12:56 PM
tekshogun
Offline:
My Rank: PRIVATE FIRST CLASS
Poster Rank:4731
Join Date: Jan 2013
 
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 14/20
Today Posts
0/11 sssssss58
Re: Large Crawler Crane Lifting Viaduct Section Goes Wrong

That was an impressive catastrophic failure to be able to see happen. I rewatched the video several times to see all the nuances and was specifically looking for the operator whom I saw barely dodging falling debris. Impressive indeed.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to tekshogun For This Useful Post:
AngelAssassin, Cancun78, Helicocker
  #9  
Old 05-31-2017, 04:00 PM
commondenom's Avatar
commondenom
Offline:
puelling pueman
Poster Rank:165
m
Join Date: Apr 2010
 
Mentioned: 21 Post(s)
Quoted: 2944 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 17/20
Today Posts
0/11 sssss8908
Re: Large Crawler Crane Lifting Viaduct Section Goes Wrong

mama mia!!!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to commondenom For This Useful Post:
burrrrr1991
  #10  
Old 08-15-2017, 09:38 AM
King Herald's Avatar
King Herald
Offline:
★ Legacy Member ★
Poster Rank:420
Male
Join Date: Sep 2009
 
Mentioned: 2 Post(s)
Quoted: 327 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
1/20 17/20
Today Posts
0/11 sssss2697
Re: Large Crawler Crane Lifting Viaduct Section Goes Wrong

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bleeed.exe View Post
They didn't give themselves any room to raise the counterweight and/or lower the boom it was on.
Why would they do that? It was supposed to keep the crane body level, so no need to go up or down.

Somebody has obviously fucked up the calculations for this lift. There should be a 50% safety margin for the whole operation.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to King Herald For This Useful Post:
AngelAssassin, GiJoe7898

Powered by vBulletin Copyright 2000-2010 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO