[Guns N' Coffee]

[kellyhound]

Hellfire is an air-to-ground, laser guided, subsonic missile with significant anti-tank capacity. It can also be used as an air-to-air weapon against helicopters or slow-moving fixed-wing aircraft.

Weird it can hit something moving that fast or is the object appearing to move fast because of how it was filmed.

Also:

I can somewhat analyze the video because I am familiar with these systems.

I saw this video months ago on the DoD’s SIPRnet Intelink iVideo site. Only people with secret clearance can access this site, and only from specific workstations, and SCIFs.

There’s only one actual debris that falls away with the momentum of the craft.

The rest are artifacts from IR multipath interference from a pitted lens housing and/or lens of the camera, where after a certain heat threshold and angle of the source to the sensor, the IR signal takes multiple paths to the sensor due to lens housing having defects on it. That makes it look like multiple pieces of debris “following” the drone.

That’s what’s happening here.

The official analysis is HTK (hit-to-kill) via Hellfire is sometimes not sufficient to bring down a Huthi drone. That’s it.

[mr_feelgood]

It's the end of the world

[houseoftechno]

Originally Posted by kellyhound ↗

Hellfire is an air-to-ground, laser guided, subsonic missile with significant anti-tank capacity. It can also be used as an air-to-air weapon against helicopters or slow-moving fixed-wing aircraft.

Weird it can hit something moving that fast or is the object appearing to move fast because of how it was filmed.

Also:

I can somewhat analyze the video because I am familiar with these systems.

I saw this video months ago on the DoD’s SIPRnet Intelink iVideo site. Only people with secret clearance can access this site, and only from specific workstations, and SCIFs.

There’s only one actual debris that falls away with the momentum of the craft.

The rest are artifacts from IR multipath interference from a pitted lens housing and/or lens of the camera, where after a certain heat threshold and angle of the source to the sensor, the IR signal takes multiple paths to the sensor due to lens housing having defects on it. That makes it look like multiple pieces of debris “following” the drone.

That’s what’s happening here.

The official analysis is HTK (hit-to-kill) via Hellfire is sometimes not sufficient to bring down a Huthi drone. That’s it.

Yup. Not all air missile strikes are home runs.

The real mystery is what brought down multiple WTC towers that were not hit by the 2 jets?

[IvorySmith]

Originally Posted by houseoftechno ↗

Yup. Not all air missile strikes are home runs.

The real mystery is what brought down multiple WTC towers that were not hit by the 2 jets?

Mostly physics

[houseoftechno]

Originally Posted by IvorySmith ↗

Mostly physics

Thanks, that was interesting. It fails to explain how the tower (WTC7) had enough fuel to create a fire hot enough to melt its columns. I guess the real column damage could have been caused by the adjacent tower collapse, with building envelope holding up the structure until the fire weakened the envelope.

[kellyhound]

Originally Posted by houseoftechno ↗

Thanks, that was interesting. It fails to explain how the tower (WTC7) had enough fuel to create a fire hot enough to melt its columns. I guess the real column damage could have been caused by the adjacent tower collapse, with building envelope holding up the structure until the fire weakened the envelope.

It burned for 7 hours.

NIST conducted an additional computer analysis. The goal was to see if the loss of WTC 7's Column 79—the structural component identified as the one whose failure on 9/11 started the progressive collapse—would still have led to a complete loss of the building if fire or damage from the falling debris of the nearby WTC 1 tower were not factors. The investigation team concluded that the column's failure under any circumstance would have initiated the same sequence of events.

This information was exempt from public disclosure under Section 7d of the National Construction Safety Team Act because it was determined by the Director of NIST that release of the files might jeopardize public safety.

Way more: https://www.nist.gov/world-trade-cen...-investigation

[LuckiiDevil21]

9/11 was an inside job

[IvorySmith]

Originally Posted by LuckiiDevil21 ↗

9/11 was an inside job

If by "inside job" you mean that the U.S. caused the conditions that allowed it to happen, then I'd agree with you.
A couple of Wahhabists (pre-ISIS people) were pissed off at America for occupying their holy land (Saudi Arabia). After years of complaining, they decided to cause a scene to get people to notice. Unfortunately for them, it didn't change anything in their favor.

What were we told? Those people are terrorists. They hate democracy. They live just to make our lives miserable. We got told that all while ignoring what led up to it.

There's 0 chance that those people simply "hated democracy," after we've overthrown every democratically elected government in the middle east since Iran in the 1953. They simply hate our illusion of "democracy." Watch some interviews with Iranians some time. Many of them HATE America, but have no problems with Americans, because they feel sorry for our ignorance. Many "patriots" in America hate anything brown because it's a "patriotic" belief that we only go to war with people who hate democracy, who conveniently are usually brown.
It's hard to see the boot that's stomping on your face when you're the one underneath it. But others can see it.

Now the Pentagon... I dunno. I've driven past it, and I can't see how someone inexperienced can fly a passenger jet - perfectly - into the finance department of that short building. It seems more likely that a missile struck it, and that the pricks who took the money during the '96-'00 administration, the same ones who helped create ISIS 13 years later, knew about the impending tower strikes and used it as a way to cover up their theft of tax dollars by hiring someone to strike it with a missile. But we'll never know, so why waste your time on that?

The towers, though, were 100% pissed off Saudis; I'm convinced. Most likely reason: Because they hate our empire.
2nd most likely reason: Democrats hired them to do it. 3rd most likely reason: Republicans hired them to do it.

[houseoftechno]

I cannot get over the material science inconsistencies of WTC1&2, especially that jet fuel or any other fuel in the towers can not burn hot enough to melt the steel columns and trigger a free fall collapse.