|
#2
●
04-10-2025, 05:44 AM
|
|
Re: Return of the Dire Wolf
But while the young wolves - Romulus, Remus, and Khaleesi - represent an impressive technological breakthrough, independent experts say they are not actually dire wolves. Zoologist Philip Seddon from the University of Otago in New Zealand explained the animals are "genetically modified grey wolves". Colossal publicised its efforts to use similar cutting edge genetic techniques to bring back extinct animals including the woolly mammoth and the Tasmanian tiger. Meanwhile experts have pointed to important biological differences between the wolf on the cover of Time and the dire wolf that roamed and hunted during the last ice age. Paleogeneticist Dr Nic Rawlence, also from Otago University, explained how ancient dire wolf DNA - extracted from fossilised remains - is too degraded and damaged to biologically copy or clone. "Ancient DNA is like if you put fresh DNA in a 500 degree oven overnight," Dr Rawlence told BBC News. "It comes out fragmented - like shards and dust. "You can reconstruct [it], but it's not good enough to do anything else with." Instead, he added, the de-extinction team used new synthetic biology technology - using the ancient DNA to identify key segments of code that they could edit into the biological blueprint of a living animal, in this case a grey wolf. "So what Colossal has produced is a grey wolf, but it has some dire wolf-like characteristics, like a larger skull and white fur," said Dr Rawlence. "It's a hybrid." Dr Beth Shapiro, a biologist from Colossal Biosciences, said that this feat does represent de-extinction, which she described as recreating animals with the same characteristics. "A grey wolf is the closest living relative of a dire wolf - they're genetically really similar - so we targeted DNA sequences that lead to dire wolf traits and then edited grey wolf cells... then we cloned those cells and created our dire wolves." According to Dr Rawlence though, dire wolves diverged from grey wolves anywhere between 2.5 to six million years ago. "It's in a completely different genus to grey wolves," he said. "Colossal compared the genomes of the dire wolf and the grey wolf, and from about 19,000 genes, they determined that 20 changes in 14 genes gave them a dire wolf." The edited embryos were implanted in surrogate domestic dog mothers. According to the article in Time, all three wolves were born by planned caesarean section to minimise the risk of complications. Colossal, which was valued at $10bn (£7.8bn) in January, is keeping the wolves on a private 2,000-acre facility at an undisclosed location in the northern US. The pups certainly look like many people's vision of a dire wolf and the story has gathered global attention. So why is this scientific distinction important? "Because extinction is still forever," Dr Rawlence told. |
|
#3
●
04-10-2025, 12:06 PM
|
|
Re: Return of the Dire Wolf
Really interesting read. Why humans feel the need to do this kind of thing is beyond me. Pretty soon they’ll start messing around with humans like this and we’ll become some kind of hybrids ourselves. Just what we need. Jurassic Fools. Fucking scientists. |
|
#4
●
04-12-2025, 12:04 AM
| ||||||||
| ♚ Legacy Gold Member ♚ Poster Rank:98 Male Join Date: Nov 2009 Posts: 16,755 Mentioned: 7 Post(s) Quoted: 4607 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Return of the Dire Wolf
Dire wolves had "saber-tooth" like fangs. These don't appear to have them, unless they just haven't developed yet. You can see their skeletons in the museum at the La Brea tar pits in L.A. These don't look anything like those, structurally. Also, I would prefer they recreate Farrah Fawcett instead. I don't want to "wag my schnitzel" at THESE mofos, for one thing, just because of the physical hazards involved. But having a Farrah Fawcett clone in your backyard tea garden, lounging around, needing to have cocoa butter applied several times a day, and playing with the kittens, would be a BIG DRAW! On top of that, Farrah would probably need spankings several times a day, being as wiggly as she is. Plus, you could teach her how buttons work, too! She would be fascinated, because it's almost like "fashion magic". So THAT would make a far BETTER cloning experiment than what these doofusses just did! Am I right? or am I right? |
|
#6
●
04-12-2025, 11:57 AM
| ||||||||
| ♚ Legacy Gold Member ♚ Poster Rank:98 Male Join Date: Nov 2009 Posts: 16,755 Mentioned: 7 Post(s) Quoted: 4607 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Return of the Dire Wolf
That's IT! Too bad they did not show any of the assembled skeletons. They come up between your hips and your chest area, and they are about 8 feet long. These are BIG MFers! It was spooky just standing next to them at the museum. It's an awesome museum. ALSO, they have the first known murder victim as well, some woman that was killed by a blow to the head, and thrown into the tarpits. (Cave Man Divorce, maybe?) |
|
#10
●
04-14-2025, 11:10 PM
|
|
Re: Return of the Dire Wolf
What could go wrong? They get out and multiply and kill other species of a myriad of animals and the balance of nature has been altered. Sorta like the Lyme, CT tick experiment that got out and look what's happened with that debacle.
|