[CuriousCanadian]

Originally Posted by Fahrenheit ↗

So we should discard all the witness statements, what the police saw etc, for your theory? Haha.

What you should do is spend a little more time than 3 minutes of reading and do some actual research. Don't just look up what they are telling you - look into the stuff that is kept quiet/swept under the rug.
Police didn't see anything cuz they weren't there until AFTER...
Remember - the closest cops were directed away from the area by that call?

[CuriousCanadian]

Originally Posted by Tiffany32 ↗

Why do you assume the stuff you read from ill reputable personal websites & blogs is true ? There was only one shooter .. a very angry and mentally disturbed young man named Martin Bryant !! Here read this and watch this you may find something that doesn't fit into your little conspiracy theory

http://www.news.com.au/national/my-t...-1226738815697

LOL - you believe everything you see on tv? Of course they don't lie...right? Weapons of Mass Destruction in Iraq - we better get over there
Fuck ur naive

[Tiffany32]

Well the weapons of mass destruction thing is way different .. I mean that was pure revenge ... G.W. Bush wanted to invade Iraq because Saddam tried to kill his father the elder George Bush but whether he actually believed Iraq had weapons of mass destruction I do not know that- but remember the dictator Saddam was very secretive with the UN inspectors so not alot was known @ the time but saying they have WMDs 100% was a lie no doubt .. and BTW I've read more than 3 minutes on the Martin Bryant subject both conspiracy an non-conspiracy smarty pants !

[Sypher209]

I just bring to light the events that seem very shady and not clear cut. I have extensive training with weapons of all kinds, and the manner in which these events took place just doesn't match up.

Conducting a kill sweep such as he did in the amount of time in which the event took place, would call for a shit tonne more than just going gung ho on everyone at random. The crime scene looks as if most people were shot execution style, mostly kill shots straight through the head. Even if he'd used rifles since a young age, that does not say he was capable of carrying out such a meticulous and precise kill sweep with such finesse in so little time.

It also brings more attention to the case when absolutely no media is allowed to speak with him, no questions asked, thrown deep behind bars, never to be heard from ever again, even if pictures are taken of him they're immediately destroyed.

[jesse]

...things the Lord hate and are an abomination unto him:

......hands that shed innocent blood. Proverbs 6:16-17

What a waste of human life.....

[Tiffany32]

Originally Posted by Sypher209 ↗

It also brings more attention to the case when absolutely no media is allowed to speak with him, no questions asked, thrown deep behind bars, never to be heard from ever again, even if pictures are taken of him they're immediately destroyed.

..it is strange there's no recent picture of him, the most recent picture of him on the internet is this one .. as he appeared on the video screen during a July 1996 court hearing in Hobart. Nothing since .. at least not posted online ..

[Photoplay]

Never to be released Prisoners that no interview or photographs of them have been seen since the 1st day of incarceration

This is not unusual

IVAN MALAT ~ The Back Pack Murders

ANDY ALBURY. ~ An ex-abattoir worker, who was dubbed Australias HannibalLector

JOHN TRAVERS, Michael Murdoch, MICHAEL, GARY AND LES MURPHY ~ The Murder of Anita Cobby.

STEVEN JAMES HUNTER ~ Sarah Cafferkey's killer

JULIAN KNIGHT ~ Hoddle Street Massacre
Most of knights victims were shot in the head and chest, and back region. Except for those that survived.

[Photoplay]

Sorry Apologies. Bit of a duffer.
I should have said, that the prisoners have not been see in photographs or interviews unless they reappeared in court on further charges....

[Sypher209]

The destruction of pictures or interviews being destroyed still brings some questions.

[Photoplay]

Originally Posted by Sypher209 ↗

The destruction of pictures or interviews being destroyed still brings some questions.

@Sypher209 It certainly does
Please understand I’m not saying you’re wrong and I’m right or vice versa.
I’m only adding to the discussion or comments because I love the subject of crime and investigation, it became a hobby to me PLUS I’m a gas bag[ talk the leg off a table I would]
Thank goodness for people who have a healthy skepticism, I reckon. Helps keep the world at least a little honest. [Hopefully I’m one of them]
I certainly enjoy reading all comments and thinking about the issues rose.
Museums are built and the history within preserved for ever and so should criminal evidence, even if the case has been solved. Not for public view although I’d certainly attend if I could see evidence through a glass cabinet.
How many times has it come to light that a criminal serving prison time has been found if not totally innocent at least a reasonable doubt of guilt years and years later?
Because History has taught all inquiring minds that what we first see, hear, read or are told is not always the truth.
It’s just in this case. My [opinion only] is that they got the villain and it wasn’t a government conspiracy