|
#41
●
09-25-2011, 10:35 PM
|
|
Re: Mohammed Revealed
An insane persons ramblings lol....- "Bill that’s so sad for her. Since I am unemployed because of the massive mexican invasion and I can’t afford health care anyway how will forcing me to buy health care when I get a job help me?" Your unemployed because you go on every site you can using your real name & picture, and post up racist shit. In todays world the first thing most employers will do is check out your myspace, facebook, & probably do a google search. What do we know about you as a potential employer? Well, I couldn't have you around any minority groups, any religion other than your own, you have a fucking mail order Russian bride lol, because no American woman would put up with your shit...... And your dumb enough to put your face & name to all this shit, then have the gall to blame Mexicans for you not having a job lol. Oh yeah, and you have never met a decent black person & don't believe they exist lol. Whats never going to exist is you getting out of your Mom's basement with your idiocy & attitude. Good luck with that job hunt, you've basically decapitated any chance you might of had. |
|
#42
●
09-26-2011, 03:28 AM
|
|
Re: Mohammed Revealed
The whole fetid wretched putrified rotten cesspool that is the Moo Slum Dark Ages Death CULT is being brought out into the light where it is being exposed for what it is. It can't exist in the cold clear light of day. Only in the dark. It's days are numbered. It's only a matter of time before the Earth will be cleansed of the stench and stain of the Moo Slum evil. |
|
#44
●
09-26-2011, 09:25 PM
|
|
Re: Mohammed Revealed
Oh dear Rob666, You have been busy haven't you. That was over a year and a half ago and I have been working back at my old job all year. And the racist mexican who was name calling has been finally put on notice to lay off or get laid off. And it is true that we basically can't afford health care under our present contract. The union is working on this at present. Also just last evening I was speaking to a Mexican national who has a green card and works in a bank. He was telling me how he wouldn't mind being a citizen but he was puzzled by how stupid our government is to let in not only so many illegals but also people who come in with documentation and follow the rules. He really didn't understand how a nation could talk about job security while at the same time undercutting their own citizens. And I have met more than a few Mexicans with simular opinions. One Mexican supervisor even lamented that our shipyard had too many Mexicans for his taste and quite a few had bad attitudes toward doing a good job where as the Americans of almost all races were much more diligent toward work quality. The shipyard deliberately imports Mexican nationals to undercut the union wage demands. The reason why I have survived the latest bunch of layoffs is because of my high work quality. I don't have to like having our work places overrun by foreign nationals but I do show respect and friendship toward ALL my coworkers as long as they respect me, regardless of where they are from. When one of my coworkers needs a hand with some difficult task I am the first to come running and help out. My supervisor on ship repair let me know that of all his crew I did the most to help him out and that was why I got all the difficult jobs. He KNEW I would get it done. In short I don't let my political views on rampant immigration overcome my common good sense of comradeship with my coworkers. By the way, what race is a Mexican? I have seen black Mexicans, white Mexicans of German descent, Mexicans of Chechoslovakia descent, Aboriginal Native Mexicans who could not speak a word of Spanish, Chinese Mexicans, Korean Mexicans and of course the mixed race Mexicans. So what race are you talking about? "Your unemployed because you go on every site you can using your real name & picture, and post up racist shit." Ya ya sure. That's all you got? What ever. At least I don't hide behind a false name. I have the moral courage to stand behind my convictions and defend them. All you seem to be able to do is ignore the content of my post and leave your own personal attacks toward me. If you hate my post so much then why visit it? After all I don't comment or view your threads. I really could care less about you. It is you who goes on Google searching for anything you can about me. "In todays world the first thing most employers will do is check out your myspace, facebook, & probably do a google search." Hey dumbshit, I'm a welder. They only want to know if I can weld steel and follow instructions. And I excell at what I do. More like it's you who's been sniffing around according to my account services. And I really don't care much what a pervert hater like you does. "Oh yeah, and you have never met a decent black person & don't believe they exist lol." You mean like the ones that go on racist rants attacking whites and robbing them? Maybe I should start a thread with all that and the photos. Yep. That would be sweet. On the other hand I have heard James Manning speak and he is a real cool dude. I like him even more than Alan Keyes and then there is Clarance Thomas who compared the democrat attacks on him with a "modern day lynching". In short I like blacks who respect me as a person and respect their fellow Americans' rights regardless of race. I do hate race baiters like Al Sharpton who deliberately instagated a riot that led to the death of a Jewish shop owner who never hurt a soul. When a black man named Shabazz stands out in public and screams that black people need to start killing white babies then I do hate that person. I have no love for such murderous maniacs. While black people here in USA have made some great contributions I am still waiting to see what they will do with Africa besides kill each other, rape, eat each other, rob, steal, cheat and lie to each other. We can complain and rightly so that black criminals have been brutal with their white victims but in truth they are even more brutal and murderous toward each other. Here in USA and in their own native lands. "Whats never going to exist is you getting out of your Mom's basement with your idiocy & attitude. Good luck with that job hunt, you've basically decapitated any chance you might of had.". Actually I have not had a mother since I was 4 years old. And I have lived on my own since I was 14. I really don't know what your obsession is with your moms' basement. I understand my views are offensive to you and people like yourself. It's called freedom. I have a right to be offensive just as you do. . If you find my views so offensive then why waste time looking them up? Obsession? I don't look up anything about your views because I really don't care. If a thread appears with your name on it I just pass it by. But then I have never seen a thread with your name on it. Surely I will try to post some more threads of interest to you. |
|
#46
●
09-26-2011, 10:02 PM
|
|
Re: Mohammed Revealed
I just like to see how fucked up you really are, thats all.... its pretty amusing lol, that anybody could be so stupid to use their real name & picture to spam the internet with your hateful shit. You can write a 5k word post trying to rationalize your garbage, but the fact is your words speak for themselves, and your comment regarding black people is what it is..... Not taken out of context, not leaving parts out, its your fucking words John so at least be a man enough to own them. You've never met a decent Black person, and you don't think they exist. As someone who also works in Construction, I sure as fuck do know that making openly racist comments like that have a direct bearing on your employment chances, who are you trying to kid yourself? Nobodys gonna back you on that, not your Union, nobody..... Freedom of speech is great and all, but there is a line and your way over it. Find it pretty hard to believe that a guy that spends as much time on the internet as you do works at all. Thats quite a big trail of shit you've spread out there John, I wonder what else I might find? Anything you want to tell us? I mean your emtitled to your freedom of speech right? |
|
#47
●
09-26-2011, 10:02 PM
|
|
Re: Mohammed Revealed
Its amusing to unmask you and your agenda, thats all. The really sad thing is your probably smart enough to learn from your mistakes, and be a little better next time. Your nothing original, just a 21st century version of a guy wearing a white sheet, thats all. |
|
#48
●
09-26-2011, 10:46 PM
|
|
Re: Mohammed Revealed
Actually I looked up your quote. I don't remember ever posting anything like that but it is true that more blacks that I have met are racist than not. Openly racist in fact. Love it how they can call me cracker, and white dog and honkey and it's just ok with them. If I happen to comment on Obama's horrid policies well "that's just racist" and "You're a god damned cracker POS". Following are the only quotes I was able to find. So anyway I can't find a time or place I said such a thing and if I did then I was wrong and it's not true. Because I have met quite a few very decent black people. Sadly I wish most were decent people instead of just the few I have met. If I said such a thing I have to apologize and admit I was wrong. James Manning is one black person who is just the best man I have ever listened to. But I did not meet him. Nor did I met Alan West. In fact there are literally thousands of decent, peaceful, God fearing, honest black people I have never met. Do you even know what an ad hominem attack is? When you have nothing to refute my thread with you just attack me. And I really doubt you are a constuction worker. What kind of construction? |
|
#49
●
09-26-2011, 10:55 PM
|
|
Re: Mohammed Revealed
About the guys wearing white sheets: The Long, Sad, Violent History of Democrats' Racial Hatred for Blacks Perry Drake May 2003 ----------------------------------------------------------- It has always seemed unnatural and unwise to me whenever I hear someone who's been slandered by a particularly egregious lie reply that they're not going to dignify that accusation with a response. For it has always been crystal clear to me that whenever your honor, integrity and reputation are called into question that you should be quick, thorough and – when circumstances demand – quite loud in defense of them. Otherwise, people will assume that the accusation must carry some weight and the falsity levied against you just might end up sticking. That's what has happened to the political party that I belong to – the Republicans. For decades the Party of Lincoln has been under almost constant assault for being "racist" and "openly hostile" to blacks. However, nothing could be further from the truth – but you would never know it by the party's spineless, practically nonexistent defense of its record on race and civil rights. From the days of Lincoln until the present, blacks have had no better friend, party-wise, than the Republicans. Since its inception in the mid-19th century, the GOP has built an exemplary record on civil rights, particularly if you want to use the Democrat Party as a comparison. The party's first president, Abraham Lincoln, issued the Emancipation Proclamation on Jan. 1, 1863, the height of the Civil War, squelching any chance that the European powers of the day would intervene in the conflict in favor of the Confederacy. With the stroke of his pen, Lincoln destroyed the last real hope the Confederacy had for a victory. Soon after the war ended, it was a Republican-controlled Congress that rammed through the 13th, 14th and 15th Amendments to the Constitution that, among other things, abolished slavery, guaranteed equal protection and due process and addressed blacks' right to vote. In the late 19th century, Democrat governors and Democrat-controlled state legislatures in the South couldn't pass Jim Crow laws fast enough. Those Democrats created a nearly century-long, legal racial caste system that relegated blacks to the lowest educational, political, economic and social strata. I have family members who grew up under Jim Crow. To hear them tell it, it weren't no joke. And let us not forget that during the same period it was Democrats throughout the United States who organized and ran America's premier terrorist organization – the Ku Klux Klan. And speaking of the Klan, remember the great Democrat President Woodrow Wilson? After a screening of D.W. Griffith's paean to the Ku Klux Klan, "Birth of a Nation," Wilson, turned-movie critic, said of the film: "It is like writing history with lightning. And my only regret is that it is all so terribly true." Needless to say, the NAACP had a different outlook. After its viewing, the civil rights organization was mortified to the point of launching a nationwide protest in 1915 against the film. The group was equally appalled by President Wilson's comments and it launched a public protest against him. Before we move on, one more thing about President Wilson. He was the president who led our nation into WWI with the ringing declaration that it was to make the world "safe for democracy." In Woodrow's mind, though, "democracy" applied to everyone except those annoying little dark-skinned people in America who are always clamoring for civil rights. In 1913, Wilson introduced segregation into the federal government. Yes, dear readers, the man who is worshipped as the utmost "progressive" (where and by who have you heard that term used lately?) of his time allowed federal officials to segregate "toilets, cafeterias and work" areas of various federal departments. It was left to Wilson's successor, Republican Warren G. Harding to scrap the segregation policy. And Warren G. didn't stop there. In 1922, Harding delivered a bold speech in Birmingham, Ala., (A Democrat stronghold that was later known by blacks as "Bombingham") in which he called for black equality. Up to then, no U.S. president had ever spoken so forcefully about civil rights. Harding was elected in 1920. Funny thing about the Republican Party platform that Harding ran under. It called for federal anti-lynching legislation. Guess which party didn't? If you said Democrat, go to the head of the line. Moving on, in answer to the burgeoning civil rights movement in the '50s, it was Democrat governors and Democrat-controlled state legislatures in the South that placed the Confederate battle flag on their state capitol flags. It's an issue that continues to inflame racial passions even today. In 1957, Orval Faubus, the governor of Arkansas, called out his state's National Guard to prevent the integration of Central High School in Little Rock. In response, President Dwight D. Eisenhower sent U.S. troops to the city to escort nine frightened black teens into the school past riotous mobs inflamed by Faubus' defiance of a federal court order. Faubus was a Democrat. Eisenhower was a Republican. On June 11, 1963, Alabama Gov. George Wallace stood in the doorway of the University of Alabama to block its integration. Wallace was a Democrat. Now, I grant you, John F. Kennedy was the Democrat president who federalized the Alabama National Guard and ordered its units to the university to force its doors open to black students. But it's not generally known that the then-Sen. Kennedy – with an eye on the Democrat presidential nomination for 1960 – voted against the Civil Rights Act of 1957, the law that really got the ball rolling on federal civil rights legislation. And it was Kennedy's brother, Robert, who in 1964 assisted the FBI's efforts to destroy Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. by approving the wiretapping of the man considered the heart and soul of the civil rights movement. And to think at one time you could find in black homes across the nation what I used to call the Black Person's Trinity: chintzy, black-velvet portraits of JFK, RFK and Dr. King painted side by side. As far as other important civil rights legislation, the 1964 Civil Rights Act and the Voting Rights Act of 1965 would never have became law if not for Republican senators and congressmen whose overwhelming support offset extreme Democrat opposition. Now honesty demands that I admit that I have never been in favor of affirmative action programs. As a black man I find them demeaning, and as an American, divisive. But that's an argument for another day. However, the fact remains that it was President Nixon who implemented the first affirmative action program with the Philadelphia Plan in the late 1960s. The plan required government contractors to set goals and timetables for hiring minorities. Nixon was a Republican. Sure, some will say that it's all well and good to cite the historical record, but what about now? What have the Republicans done of late? I begin by pointing out that Democrats continue to demonstrate a curious affinity for standing in schoolhouse doors, especially when black children are involved. But of late, Democrats are not trying to keep black children out, but in. In public opinion polls on school choice, blacks overwhelmingly favor vouchers to rescue their children from failing schools. No one knows better the damage that poor schools can do to their children's future and communities than blacks. Republicans are in favor of school choice. Democrats aren't. Also in more contemporary times, President Bush appointed two blacks to the highest positions in government ever occupied by blacks in America. Today, national security adviser Condoleezza Rice and Secretary of State Colin Powell are very powerful, influential members of the Bush administration. Powell, in fact, is fourth in the succession line for the presidency. Oh, by the way, do you know who is third in line? Sen. Robert Byrd of West Virginia. Old "Sheets" himself. The same Byrd of the "white *******" comments on March 5, 2001, and who was a member of the KKK. And Sen. Byrd was not just any old member. No, sir. He was a "grand kleagle" – a recruiter! Does anyone remember the late war with Iraq? It lasted about a minute but you may have had a chance to notice that the vice chief of operations at Central Command was a brotha – Army Brig. Gen. Vincent Brooks. And let's not let the "fair and free" press off the hook. Back when Jim Crow and segregation were "the law of the land" in the South, the press served as cheerleaders for all those kind, compassionate Democrats as they lovingly lynched black people by the hundreds on a yearly basis. Small wonder that the press behaved as badly as it did, though. The people who ran those papers, which proudly featured the brutalized and desecrated bodies of black lynching victims on their front pages quite frequently, were all Democrats. Today, whenever a Republican says anything that can be twisted by Democrats and race hustlers to smack the least bit of racism, the press is quick to pounce on him like Jesse Jackson on a bag of stolen federal dollars. The hypocrisy of the press on matters of race is appalling. Just take a walk into your average newsroom and tell me what you see? Wait, I'll save you the trip – a sea of white faces and sprinkled here and there, a black face or two. Or better still, tune in to any one of the numerous weekly Sunday news shows and what you'll find is overwhelming white. Now here's a homework assignment – what political party do you think most of the members of the press belong to? Here's a hint – Democrat. I need not end here. I could go on all day citing example after example on this matter (Does the name Bull Connor ring a bell, for instance? A Democrat. Hah!). But it would be heartening indeed if the next time accusations of racism are hurled against them, that Republicans would grow a spine and quickly, thoroughly and – when circumstances demand – quite loudly defend their honor, integrity and reputation. |
|
#50
●
09-28-2011, 04:58 PM
|
|
Re: Mohammed Revealed
You really doubt that I could work in Construction? Why, because where I work being openly racist is not tolerated? This has nothing to do with refuting your thread, I'd say its more about refuting your agenda. Every single site you go on, you pick on whatever minority group you feel will be the easiest target, which on this site happens to be Muslims & Homosexuals...... You're not sure how making comments against Black people would go over here, so your trying to backtrack away from your comments lol........ Be a man John, own your opinions. You make broad statements that you say applies to the whole group, when in fact what you do is pick the worst traits of a group and portray all of them in that fashion. Depending on the interpretation of the law, it could almost be considered inciting hate towards certain groups. As far as your statements regarding Black people, its pretty easy for anybody to find, and its quoted here verbatim for anybody to read...... It was not a response to a black person attacking you, its you doing what you do.... Portraying a whole ethnic group based on the actions of its worst. |