[mmeroyale]

(Sorry if this was posted somewhere else but I couldn't find it so I thought this was the appropriate place)

So anyone watched Netflix's documentary on Steven Avery's story?
I was SO hooked on it when it came out. So many unexplained stuff.

[Susan]

I've watched the first episode and ten mins of the second one so far, very gripping.

[Steve]

Another member mentioned it yesterday so I am into the second episode, watching those bastards making excuses and pretending they don't remember what they said was irritating.

[BlueNosePit]

Yea that shit had me hooked. I watched all the episodes in one sitting. While I think there was definitely some corruption happening to help prove his guilt I also think the jury got it right and he was guilty regardless.

[mmeroyale]

I was hooked too. It got me thinking several times "oh can't get worse than that" and then it would suckerpunch me and go "yeah it can bitch"
IMO he doesn't seem to have the intelligence to plan that so precisely. Like that house was a hoarders paradise did you see the garage?! no fucking way he'd be able to clean all that and not even leave a scent of chemicals from cleaning or drop of blood behind.
To me it was someone that knew he'd be convicted right away. Not the police but like someone that was aware he creeped out Halbach. Because of the knowledge of where his gun was (over his bed) and stuff I'd assume it's someone that's fairly close or familiar with him (unless ofc it was some stalker tho there's a plethora of Averys living in that propriety so)

So there's a lot of articles online about the case now. Imma mention them so if you haven't finished SPOILER ALERT

apparently what Kratz is complaining wasn't shown on the show was this:

(TIME magazine orginally published it) There was additional DNA evidence pointing to Avery. According to prosecutor Ken Kratz, that is. He told Maxim that Avery’s DNA was found under Halbach’s trunk (though earlier he said it was found under the hood). “It wasn’t blood. It was from his sweaty hands. Do the cops also have a vial of his sweat that they are carrying around? The evidence conclusively shows that Steven Avery’s hand was under the hood when he insists he never touched her car,” said Kratz.

Halbach’s belongings were found on Avery’s property. Kratz said her phone and camera were found 20 feet from Avery’s door. “This isn’t contested,” he said. “It was all presented as evidence at the jury trial, and the documentary people don’t tell you that.”

Avery and Halbach knew each other. Halbach had been to Avery’s home several times to photograph vehicles for Auto Trader magazine. When Avery set up an appointment with a photographer, he reportedly requested her specifically, saying, “Send the girl who was out here before.” Kratz also told People that Halbach said she was “creeped out” by him.

Two jurors in the Avery trial had relatives working for the Manitowoc Sheriff’s Department. One man had a son in the department, and another had a wife in the county clerk of court’s office, according to the Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. Dean Strang, one of Avery’s lawyers, said the connections were known — but both the defense and prosecution had apparently used up their allotted juror dismissals.

The documentary received plenty of pushback before it was even released. According to BuzzFeed, the government “did certainly go out of their way to try and quash their documentary.” In the fall of 2006, the state tried to subpoena the footage, so Demos and Ricciardi hired a lawyer of their own. “The state wanted any statement Steven made … and statements by others who might have knowledge or claim to have knowledge about who was responsible for the death of Teresa Halbach,” Ricciardi said. “It was a fishing expedition, and we really think it was an effort by the state to shut down our production.”

[freeflykat]

I have one episode left, but I definitely think he is innocent and obviously his nephew. My guess is the victim's brother, or the exboyfriend, but could be a cop or even the 1985 case's DA who has been accused of sexually assaulting women in his office, who was set to give a deposition. I see no motive for Avery to kill her. Besides, if he did, he had way better means of disposing the body and the Toyota Rav-4 at his disposal.

[Hotsauce]

He may be innocent of the first murder, but he is now serving time for a later rape and murder he one hundred percent committed. I will have to post a link to that second story. one sec.

[Hotsauce]

http://www.documentingreality.com/fo...r-case-156087/


Here's the murder he committed as well as the nephew confessing to what they did at school. I honestly think what the police originally did to him fucked him up so much . Poor woman :(

[Vedderman]

Originally Posted by Hotsauce ↗

He may be innocent of the first murder, but he is now serving time for a later rape and murder he one hundred percent committed. I will have to post a link to that second story. one sec.

You seem to be somewhat clueless here, I'm sorry. Did you miss the entire point of this thread?

The documentary this entire thread is about (ie the one mentioned in the title?) specifically refers to the one and only murder he has ever been charged with or convicted of, and the horrifying amount of corruption that surrounded the entire investigation.

[Vedderman]

Originally Posted by Hotsauce ↗

http://www.documentingreality.com/fo...r-case-156087/


Here's the murder he committed as well as the nephew confessing to what they did at school. I honestly think what the police originally did to him fucked him up so much . Poor woman :(

This thread is about a specific documentary that addresses this very point. One in which you will see hours of footage clearly demonstrating that the halfwit, underaged nephew and his younger female cousin made up the ENTIRE STORY after being brow-beaten and coerced by two morally-bankrupt cops looking for a sensational result.

The 'confession' that you are claiming proves a murder he 'one hundred percent committed' was an absolute sham, obtained under some of the most vile of unethical circumstances and then gussied up by the poor kid's asshat of a public defender who, it was later proven, was secretly working with the prosecution.

The documentary in question here is a 10-hour presentation of the five MILLION things horribly wrong with this case. Please go watch it in its entirety before commenting on it.