|
#11
●
11-30-2010, 01:34 AM
|
|
Re: I Mean,who Doesn't Like Metallic Ink Printed Underwear?
Its not so much about hiding but violating people. First off if people don't want to do the scan or accept the groping they get fined...seems shady that they are forcing people to do this...also is shady since the machine can not detect powders, liquids, or plastics....all 3 of which are the most likely ingredients of a portable bomb meant to be mixed together later...Finally these are BS in my mind due to conflict of interest....I believe it was the ex head of the department of homeland security that was part of the 350 million dollar contract to get these things in airports....They are not necessary and don't work...and shoot shit tons of radiation at you...fuck that shit. But I guess if you don't mind xray pics that show you nude being saved on the TSAs systems, being groped by random people, or being subjected to radiation for the name of "security" then more power to you |
|
#12
●
11-30-2010, 11:33 PM
| ||||||||
| So Fucking Banned Poster Rank:1332 dude Join Date: Feb 2010 Posts: 453 Mentioned: 1 Post(s) Quoted: 16 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: I Mean,who Doesn't Like Metallic Ink Printed Underwear?
You are right. When he was head of Homeland Security he was pushing for a government contract for those machines, now he's making mucho money off of them.
|
|
#15
●
12-02-2010, 12:40 AM
|
|
Re: I Mean,who Doesn't Like Metallic Ink Printed Underwear?
http://www.wesh.com/r/25967508/detail.html <= they dont see inside people http://www.vancouversun.com/travel/F...610/story.html <== Israeli has the safest airports in the world....and they don't need them. They cost taxpayer money as well...millions of it...for something we dont need and that I have yet to see actually do anything... |