JavaScript and Cookies are required to view this site. Please enable both in your browser settings.
Earliest Known Nuclear Family Found; Died in Massacre?

Earliest Known Nuclear Family Found; Died in Massacre? 

Current Rating:

Unlimited Views No Ads No Algorithms Lifetime Account

Documenting Reality

Community Forum · Est. 2006

Join Now
Thread Tools
  #1  
11-29-2008, 10:04 AM
Baldy's Avatar
Baldy
Offline:
Super *********
Poster Rank:1038
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 659
 
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 8 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 20/20
Today Posts
0/11 ssssss659
Earliest Known Nuclear Family Found; Died in Massacre?

The oldest known burial of a nuclear family, which includes a mother, father, and two boys, has been unearthed in Germany.

The 4,600-year-old family, which was buried together in a deliberate huddle, may have died during a violent massacre.
The find also gives scientists clues about the social organization of the late Stone Age period, which started around 10,000 B.C.

The skeletons were uncovered in 2005 in a group of graves at an archeological site in the Eulau region.

The excavation revealed four separate graves containing 13 bodies—5 adults and 8 children. Within the group, DNA analysis confirmed a family of four, with the two children between 4 to 5 and 8 to 9 years old, respectively.

"We were lucky to find a site like that," said lead study author Wolfgang Haak, from the University of Adelaide in Australia.

"Normally a family doesn't die at the same time and isn't buried in the same time."

Multiple burials occurred during the Neolithic, but individuals were usually buried at different times, sometimes years apart, Haak added. (See a burial dubbed the Stone Age embrace that was found in the Sahara desert.)

Family Ties

Radiocarbon dating showed the family lived around 2600 B.C. and belonged to the Corded Ware culture, named for the distinctive twisted impressions that decorated artifacts of the time.

However, archeologists rarely find Corded Ware settlements, so they rely on information from burial sites to piece together the culture of the ancient people.

The new find hints that family relationships played a hefty role in the society, according to the study published this week in the journal Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.
Males were buried facing one direction, and females another direction. But in the newfound burial, the boys were buried in an unconventional position, facing their parents.

"I think they wanted to reflect a logical relationship, to tell us that these people belong together," Haak said.
In a nearby grave, a boy and girl do not face the female adult buried with them.

Genetic testing showed that those children were siblings but were not related to the adult. "She may have been an aunt, or a stepmother," Haak said.

This study "provides conclusive genetic evidence for the simultaneous burial of a small nuclear family," said Louise Humphrey, a paleontologist with the Natural History Museum in London.

"This suggests that family ties were close and respected even in death," added Humphrey, who was not involved with the research.

Tracing Origins

Researchers measured the ratio of strontium—a metallic element—in the bones and teeth of the bodies.

The results were compared with the local surroundings, giving an indication of where the people had originated.

The men had stayed within their childhood area, but the women had been raised in different locations, the data showed.

The evidence "implies that the women in the community had migrated to the region from a location at least 60 kilometers [37 miles] away, possibly at the time of their marriage," Humphrey said.

This practice would have reduced the likelihood of inbreeding, she added.

"Sudden and Violent End"

The bodies exhibited evidence of brutality commonly seen in the Neolithic, lead author Haak said.

An arrow lodged in the vertebrae of one adult, as well as skull fractures and defensive wounds among others, point to a "sudden and violent end," Haak said.

Radiocarbon dating showed the burials occurred around the same time, "probably even the same day," Haak said—suggesting the village was attacked. Based on the grave finds, adults older than 30 and children younger than 10 appear to have been the only people killed during the possible attack.

This could mean that the stronger members survived the attackers, or that they were perhaps out hunting for food at the time of the raid, Haak hypothesized.

Whatever happened, the survivors "must have returned to bury [the dead] with that careful treatment that we see today," Haak said.

"Someone must have known what the story was. They wanted to preserve that."
081117-stone-age-family_big.jpg
68.0 KB ·320 views
This User Says Thank You For This Post:
smackem
▼ PROMO FROM DOCUMENTING REALITY
Not everything online is real. We are
Join Now
Hidden for upgraded members.
  #2  
11-29-2008, 11:14 AM
chris's Avatar
chris
Online
★ ★ GENERAL ★ ★
Poster Rank:41
male
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 35,811
Contributions: 35
 
Mentioned: 2202 Post(s)
Quoted: 21047 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
9/20 20/20
Today Posts
11/11 ssss35811
Re: Earliest Known Nuclear Family Found; Died in Massacre?

Man stuff like this is so cool, great post!
__________________
Support the site and our continued existance by upgrading to a Green Name
  #3  
05-01-2009, 02:51 PM
Farley69's Avatar
Farley69
Offline:
My Rank: PRIVATE FIRST CLASS
Poster Rank:4957
Female
Join Date: Apr 2009
Posts: 54
 
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 18/20
Today Posts
0/11 sssssss54
Re: Earliest Known Nuclear Family Found; Died in Massacre?

Great post!
  #4  
05-02-2009, 10:53 PM
Misanthropic's Avatar
Misanthropic
Offline:
My Rank: PRIVATE
Poster Rank:6116
Female
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 37
 
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 1 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 18/20
Today Posts
0/11 sssssss37
Re: Earliest Known Nuclear Family Found; Died in Massacre?

That's Interesting, to bad we won't really know why they were killed..
  #5  
05-03-2009, 11:29 AM
Hotstuff's Avatar
Hotstuff
Offline:
★ CUNT ★
Poster Rank:134
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 12,119
 
Mentioned: 0 Post(s)
Quoted: 28 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 18/20
Today Posts
0/11 ssss12119
Re: Earliest Known Nuclear Family Found; Died in Massacre?

really interesting
  #6  
10-08-2009, 08:51 PM
annmarie's Avatar
annmarie
Offline:
My Rank: FIRST SERGEANT
Poster Rank:387
Black sexy female doctor
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 3,081
 
Mentioned: 1 Post(s)
Quoted: 9 Post(s)
Activity Longevity
0/20 17/20
Today Posts
0/11 sssss3081
Re: Earliest Known Nuclear Family Found; Died in Massacre?

surpriseing


Powered by vBulletin Copyright 2000-2010 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO