JavaScript and Cookies are required to view this site. Please enable both in your browser settings.
Aviation & Military Aviation Thread

Aviation & Military Aviation Thread

Current Rating:
Unlimited Views No Ads No Algorithms Lifetime Account

Documenting Reality

Community Forum · Est. 2006

Join Now
Tools ▾
  #1  
● 06-14-2016, 06:28 PM
Geemonster's Avatar
Geemonster
Offline: Offline
KING OF DROOL
Poster Rank:3
Bloke
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 123,458
Joined Nov 2009·Rank #3
 
123,458Posts
71,390Thanked
38,163Quoted
197Mentioned
0Contrib.
Aviation & Military Aviation Thread

Highly impressive avionics for a UAV.

Looks like a little Northrop signature at the rear there.
▲ This User Says Thank You For This Post:
Bletch
▼ PROMO FROM DOCUMENTING REALITY
Where there is will, there's a way
Join Now
Hidden for upgraded members.
  #2  
● 06-14-2016, 06:33 PM
Xfactor's Avatar
Xfactor
Offline: Offline
Avoiding Limelight
Poster Rank:147
Male
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 11,473
Contributions: 5
Joined May 2009·Rank #147
 
11,473Posts
7,135Thanked
2,197Quoted
14Mentioned
5Contrib.
Re: Aviation & Military Aviation Thread

I do love my military aviation as it goes.
Here's a documentary on my favourite 5th Generation fighter, the best fighter never produced.



I'd be interested to see anything else posted here.
YF-23 is a prototype that lost to the YF-22 (F-22). It was never in production.
  #3  
● 06-14-2016, 06:59 PM
Geemonster's Avatar
Geemonster
Offline: Offline
KING OF DROOL
Poster Rank:3
Bloke
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 123,458
Joined Nov 2009·Rank #3
 
123,458Posts
71,390Thanked
38,163Quoted
197Mentioned
0Contrib.
Re: Aviation & Military Aviation Thread

YF-23 is a prototype that lost to the YF-22 (F-22). It was never in production.
Yep! That's Lobbyists for you the YF-23 was the better bird in my opinion longer range, considerably, stealthier PAV2 with her General Electric engines was faster even with supercruise.
The lack of horizontal stabilizers probably helped the YF-22 clinch it on maneuverability.
  #4  
● 06-15-2016, 10:16 AM
ItsGotHair
Offline: Offline
So Fucking Banned
Poster Rank:3488
Male
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 101
Joined Apr 2016·Rank #3,488
 
101Posts
240Thanked
55Quoted
1Mentioned
0Contrib.
Re: Aviation & Military Aviation Thread

Looks like a little Northrop signature at the rear there.
It was indeed developed by Northrop. The government had to award them a contract in the end, with two failed attempts at JSF and the YF-23.
▲ This User Says Thank You For This Post:
  #5  
● 06-15-2016, 11:06 AM
Geemonster's Avatar
Geemonster
Offline: Offline
KING OF DROOL
Poster Rank:3
Bloke
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 123,458
Joined Nov 2009·Rank #3
 
123,458Posts
71,390Thanked
38,163Quoted
197Mentioned
0Contrib.
Re: Aviation & Military Aviation Thread

It was indeed developed by Northrop. The government had to award them a contract in the end, with two failed attempts at JSF and the YF-23.
Yes Northrop now Northrop Grumman have frequently used zigzag like angles at the rear of their birds, i'm guessing to deflect radar waves as they hit it like with the B-2 Spirit and of course theYF-23.



  #6  
● 06-16-2016, 06:37 AM
Geemonster's Avatar
Geemonster
Offline: Offline
KING OF DROOL
Poster Rank:3
Bloke
Join Date: Nov 2009
Posts: 123,458
Joined Nov 2009·Rank #3
 
123,458Posts
71,390Thanked
38,163Quoted
197Mentioned
0Contrib.
Re: Aviation & Military Aviation Thread

The Sukhoi Su-37 NATO Code name UFO.
Must be why there are no UFO's in Russia.



Powered by vBulletin Copyright 2000-2010 Jelsoft Enterprises Limited.

Search Engine Friendly URLs by vBSEO