[schleifspur]

The answer to the question, why enforce the US-led NATO forces a regime change in Libya will be increasingly evident. While politicians and so-called "experts" arguing in the media over whether the rebels are supported now in Libya by the intelligence of the West and controlled or not, they ignore entirely the long term aspect of Western power politics.

One need only read the strategic designs in the U.S. AFRICOM documents, then you know what the goal of the Libya-action: The control of the valuable resources of the country and the expulsion of Chinese from North Africa.

Officially, the United States Africa Command (AFRICOM), the sixth and youngest Regional Command of the U.S. armed forces, which was established in October 2007. Since then, in October 2008, the full operational capability is established, is AFRICOM, the command of U.S. military operations throughout the African continent except Egypt.

The Pentagon has divided the world for a long time. When the United States, that currently only the public case for the legitimacy of the Pentagon, 2007 AFRICOM was starting, 49 states signed the U.S. Charter for Africa, only one state did not sign: Libya.

AFRICOM is thus an administrative and command structure of the Pentagon for the wars on the African continent, the gains in the context of resource scarcity is becoming increasingly important. Gaddafi did not want in this organization. It is a concoction of the international mafia, based in the City of London, which in turn controls the Pentagon. NATO is in the whole game as an extended arm and useful idiot of the Pentagon.

According to the Chinese Commerce Ministry of China in Libya is involved in 50 major project, the contract value accounts for 18 billion U.S. dollars. The recent unrest in North Africa broke the Chinese investments in the region. Within the first two months of this year, they declined by 43% in Libya and Algeria by 97%.

A central task of AFRICOM is to contain the Chinese influence in Africa. AFRICOM A study expresses concern that China might one day move troops to Africa to defend its interests:

"China now has a level of economic development achieved, which requires a continuous stream of African raw materials and China developed the potential to expand its influence in almost all parts of the world exercise. The extrapolation of current trends suggests that the increasing instability and uncertainty (in the region) will inevitably lead the People's Liberation Army to Africa ... ... .. "

Here we have black and white, the "fears" of U.S. military planners that, in Africa comes to a military confrontation with China. So you have to retirement planning: today in Libya, the Sudan tomorrow ....

The PR-trick with Libya

The great deception of the public through the regimented Western media was that it placed the violent and armed gangs in Libya on a par with the demonstrators in Tunisia and Egypt. The reality is quite different. But the sweet bells of freedom movements have sounded in the ears of intellectual UN diplomats in New York. A "no-fly zone" was adopted and has since then served as a pretext for war with the relevant driver for the bombing of Libya and for the open support of Al-Qaeda rebels, a vipers that nourishes the bosom of the CIA. As ever fed the Al Qaeda leader Al-Awlaki with the generals in the Pentagon ....

But there are problems for the professional saboteurs and decomposers of the international mafia in Libya. You can not beat Gaddafi and need further support from ground troops. This next phase of military occupation of Libya by NATO would be difficult to enforce and will, in any case for political vortex.

At this point you should ask yourself why can Gaddafi hold uninterrupted despite NATO air strikes and massive support of the rebels by Western intelligence agencies and "military advisers" at all? If the Libyan people for the most part set against Gaddafi, he could not succeed. Gaddafi has equipped the Libyan people in his sphere of influence with weapons. Has he no fear that these guns are brought against him?

Why the public can not learn from the past?

Some people will say that the brainwashing in the Western media and the rotten education system, the cause of the amnesia of the population. Especially for Americans relevant history does not get any further back than the last season of "Dancing With the Stars". And it is certainly not wrong when you claim that this development has been promoted at all levels of our "democracies".

The lessons from Iraq and Afghanistan are not yet arrived in the west and enable the globalists and their corrupt politicians rabble continue States to attack and incorporate in their riches, to commit genocide, to destroy the livelihood of the people and ultimately provizieren World War III to be launched by the Rockefeller family since the 70s. So far, prudent people avoid him.

But how long can the Empire afford their escalating antics yet?

One thing is certain: The knives are already being sharpened. Germany should be as fast as possible to sell this pile of rabid dogs.

[Phobophile]

Thank you for this very interesting article! (what is the source?)

[mengala]

As a famous retired U.S. general once said ''war is a racket''