|
#72
●
03-21-2013, 07:53 PM
| ||||||||
 My Rank: SERGEANT Poster Rank:1011 Male Join Date: Sep 2010 Posts: 683 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Quoted: 54 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: VINTAGE LYNCHING(lots of Pix)
So we're talking about roughly 39 per year for 90 years. Not to be inconsiderate, but that seems low compared to how many die of AIDS or by their own population, I guess what I'm saying is there seems to be far more black on black lynching do to drugs or gangs now a days then when blacks were being attacked by whites. If you add in what the consequences of unprotected sex is in the black community and the AIDS epidemic, it seems they have a far bigger problem these days.  |
|
#73
●
03-21-2013, 08:02 PM
| ||||||||
| My Rank: SERGEANT Poster Rank:1011 Male Join Date: Sep 2010 Posts: 683 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Quoted: 54 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: VINTAGE LYNCHING(lots of Pix)
Barbaric! Yes, absolutely and being white I'm not proud of what history has done, but has anyone given consideration to the lynching being done to blacks these days by blacks, when you see 3500 lynchings over 90 years (avg. 39 per year) by the hateful whites in the past, blacks are killing each other off at a much more alarming rate, furthermore their doing so for popularity among gang members or for drugs and money. |
