|
#22
●
12-23-2010, 09:07 AM
| ||||||||
 My Rank: LANCE CORPORAL Poster Rank:3332 N/A Join Date: Dec 2010 Posts: 109 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Quoted: 1 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Guillotined Man, 1920
^ Ouch nothing, he didn't feel it. And if he did, then maybe he shouldn't have triple murdered and raped. He deserved it. I definitely think we should bring them back, but only if we can do it publicly. |
|
#23
●
12-23-2010, 10:45 AM
| ||||||||
 ★ Legacy Member ★ Poster Rank:336 Male Join Date: Mar 2010 Posts: 3,794 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Quoted: 28 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Guillotined Man, 1920
so when say an extremist muslim or a foreigner cuts off a persons head its barbaric, yet when a westener does it gets celebrated as justice? hmmm, we removed these things to bring about a better society!
|
|
#24
●
12-23-2010, 11:13 AM
| ||||||||
| My Rank: LANCE CORPORAL Poster Rank:3332 N/A Join Date: Dec 2010 Posts: 109 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Quoted: 1 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Guillotined Man, 1920
When an extremist Muslim sand flea does it, they usually slowly saw off a victim's head with a dull machete for inane extremist religious reasons. This was quick, much cleaner, and with a razor sharp edge, and ideally used as a form of justice (though not always, obviously). The agony of feeling your head slowly being sawn off with a dull blade versus the quick and instantaneous death of a guillotine blade? I'd take the guillotine personally.  |
|
#25
●
12-23-2010, 11:24 AM
| ||||||||
| ★ Legacy Member ★ Poster Rank:336 Male Join Date: Mar 2010 Posts: 3,794 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Quoted: 28 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Guillotined Man, 1920
sorry i think the point i was getting at was not necessarily the chopping off of the head,,,, but the ending of someones life full stop. its barbaric, which is why it got ended! lol to bring back death penalties would un-evolve culture + society! haha fuck em lock em up for LIFE meaning 100 years minimum with no paroles or good behaviour bollocks, and they must work for food, like in Phoenix tent city, chain gangs, forced community service etc etc on basic rations, AFTER the homeless and the needy get sorted first.  oh yeah, and there was no need for the (sic)"sand flea" racist slur! lol
|
|
#26
●
12-23-2010, 11:41 AM
| ||||||||
| My Rank: LANCE CORPORAL Poster Rank:3332 N/A Join Date: Dec 2010 Posts: 109 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Quoted: 1 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Guillotined Man, 1920
Well the death penalty would have to be gone before it could be brought back, and I'm happy living in a country where people know that they may pay with their own life for taking another. I don't know how it works in England, but here, if somebody is assigned to life imprisonment, they get food, recreation time, television, visits, books, etc. All of which has to be paid for, with my tax money. I'd happily spend the few cents it takes for a bullet, take them out back, and shoot them in a grave they had to dig as opposed to spending thousands and thousands of tax dollars keeping some asshole alive who will never be free again.
|
|
#29
●
12-23-2010, 01:44 PM
| ||||||||
| ★ Legacy Member ★ Poster Rank:336 Male Join Date: Mar 2010 Posts: 3,794 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Quoted: 28 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Guillotined Man, 1920
yeh man same in England, cons get tv time,rec time, games consoles, pool tables, 3 nice meals a day, visits from friends and family.All paid for out of honest taxpayers pockets. I say strip it all away from them and explain to them that they waivered their "human rights" when they took it upon themselves to act like an animal. Then id make them work for the society they were involved in tarnishing, earning less than minimum wages of course, and then they will pay for their own food and bedding and hot water they'd be fed the lowest quality food possible and just enough to keep them able enough to work until they expire. haha
|
