|
#1
●
06-07-2011, 03:06 PM
| ||||||||
 My Rank: MAJOR Poster Rank:11 Join Date: Jun 2009 Posts: 93,130
Contributions: 226
Mentioned: 91 Post(s) Quoted: 2009 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Dissection of a Baby
Amazing old medical photo   · |
|
#2
●
06-07-2011, 03:37 PM
| ||||||||
 So Fucking Banned Poster Rank:261 Join Date: May 2010 Posts: 5,346 Mentioned: 4 Post(s) Quoted: 41 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Dissection of a Baby
That is an amazing photo Kelly!! I suppose that baby was A treasure for that Dr.,because I'm sure it was rare to get such A young child for an autopsy. Very sad though!!!  |
|
#5
●
06-07-2011, 04:48 PM
| ||||||||
 wolfie Poster Rank:220 male Join Date: Jan 2010 Posts: 6,463 Mentioned: 2 Post(s) Quoted: 92 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Dissection of a Baby
I think this is a true disection. Its not an autopsy. The kids skin is wrinkled. The cut is not in tradition of an autopsy. Kel I think you titled this one right on, and he has that shit eating grin on his face that makes me think staged for the medical books. |
|
#9
●
06-08-2011, 04:03 PM
| ||||||||
 My Rank: LANCE CORPORAL Poster Rank:3005 Female Join Date: May 2011 Posts: 131 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Quoted: 1 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Dissection of a Baby
it's kinda weird, there's a bunch of papers and books on the table, and the doctor is smiling and not even wearing gloves. but cool!
|
|
#10
●
06-08-2011, 05:22 PM
| ||||||||
 Halo or Horns today? Poster Rank:415 Ladybug Join Date: Sep 2010 Posts: 2,788 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Quoted: 49 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Dissection of a Baby
I don;t think gloves came into common practice until after the late 1800's. The biohazard knowledge was still in it's infancy then. Very cool pic Kel! |
