[TheFallOfTroyML]

Originally Posted by Anom Alley ↗

What are the refugees supposed to do? Stay in their own countries and die?

exactly


i dont like the fact that europe is "flooded" with foreigners, mostly muslims


BUT nobody would take such risks for nothing. those people need help, their home was ruined by foreign countries and it is true, most of them are highly educated.

of course there always will be a certain amount of "black sheeps", but no sane person would take such risks for fun - or would be able to afford it


on the other hand, europe has to find a way to equaly share the refugees. germany, sweden and austria are flooded with people, because we are rather "rich" (we are not, we are deeply in debt, everyone)

other countries just refuse to take them or just let them pass to the richer countries

its a problem made by the mighty in the background, and europe wont be able to take that forever


i dont know if that makes sense

[Oswald2001]

Originally Posted by Anom Alley ↗

What are the refugees supposed to do? Stay in their own countries and die?

Yes.

Do you want them to tear down your country?

[winvens]

Originally Posted by TheFallOfTroyML ↗

exactly


i dont like the fact that europe is "flooded" with foreigners, mostly muslims


BUT nobody would take such risks for nothing. those people need help, their home was ruined by foreign countries and it is true, most of them are highly educated.

of course there always will be a certain amount of "black sheeps", but no sane person would take such risks for fun - or would be able to afford it


on the other hand, europe has to find a way to equaly share the refugees. germany, sweden and austria are flooded with people, because we are rather "rich" (we are not, we are deeply in debt, everyone)

other countries just refuse to take them or just let them pass to the richer countries

its a problem made by the mighty in the background, and europe wont be able to take that forever


i dont know if that makes sense

It makes perfect sense!

Apropros of nothing, but I always read your name in my mind as "The Fall of Troy McClure".

[rob666]

Originally Posted by Oswald2001 ↗

Yes.

Do you want them to tear down your country?

Not fucking with their countries would be a good place to start

[m1324]

Originally Posted by Anom Alley ↗

What are the refugees supposed to do? Stay in their own countries and die?

the problem is they all choose" the richer countries as their destination. they don't wanna just be somewhere where it's safe.
and not only do these "rich" countries have no jobs for these refugees from some underdeveloped shithole in Syria, it will also be impossible to assimilate all those Muslim people into western European Christian society
but you also can't deny that Syria is hell on earth and you can't expect from anyone to live there.
an end of the war is basically not possible. there are so many countries who are involved in this mess.

[TheVrist]

Originally Posted by rob666 ↗

Not fucking with their countries would be a good place to start

Logic is good, if every person had the choice of what their government, the U.N, the humanitarians etc. Not to mention possibly instigators does.

But lets face it, farmer Grovideshch, in little lamb, Sweden probably had no clue of this, didn't vote for it or beg their officials to run in and get involved etc etc- So why should he suffer this cultural enrichment?

If collectively, our governments are destroying other societies, then they need to be repairing them on their own countries or adjoining countries, where their linear cultures already exist. NOT forcing it on their own people, that in the grand scheme of things, had no choice in the matter.

[TheVrist]

The good News is: Russia is stepping in. So maybe an end to this is near.

[rob666]

Originally Posted by TheVrist ↗

Logic is good, if every person had the choice of what their government, the U.N, the humanitarians etc. Not to mention possibly instigators does.

But lets face it, farmer Grovideshch, in little lamb, Sweden probably had no clue of this, didn't vote for it or beg their officials to run in and get involved etc etc- So why should he suffer this cultural enrichment?

If collectively, our governments are destroying other societies, then they need to be repairing them on their own countries or adjoining countries, where their linear cultures already exist. NOT forcing it on their own people, that in the grand scheme of things, had no choice in the matter.

From what I've read there has been a huge increase in the number of Libyan immigrants since Ghadaffi was taken out by NATO.

The country has turned into a terrorist breeding ground, and it's starting to spill out into neighbouring countries. Ghadaffi was no saint, but he had taken great strides in recent years towards integrating back into the international community, and giving up his WMD programs.

It seems to me that the outcome of taking him out was ridiculously predictable.

[TheVrist]

Originally Posted by rob666 ↗

From what I've read there has been a huge increase in the number of Libyan immigrants since Ghadaffi was taken out by NATO.

The country has turned into a terrorist breeding ground, and it's starting to spill out into neighbouring countries. Ghadaffi was no saint, but he had taken great strides in recent years towards integrating back into the international community, and giving up his WMD programs.

It seems to me that the outcome of taking him out was ridiculously predictable.

My stance on the whole issue is, we're fucking up all across the board. Allowing this many refugees in, and continuing the trend, builds the momentum of it. I mean literally hijackers are jumping the Syrian refugee train, and people from mid-west African countries are coined in on the idea to go north too. With Merkel globally advertising come all who want to ride the free ride campaign, we will see more than just middle east problems in our future.

[LrlynJy]

the sound of scrupples near their end must have been horrible to listen to.