[my2008p71]

Send them back!

[chefchic]

32 states as of 10 a.m az time!! az says "no" to any coming here. Thank the Lord. Its a stupid move to allow any of these "refugees" in to our country. I understand they have to go some place, but not here, we need to get this isis isil problem taken care of first. let the bodies lie where they fall, they are in Gods hands. we cant put innocent lives here at risk to save other folks from other countries. we need to help wipe out isis, but we need to go there and do that, not bring them here to fight, its crazy to me that Obama would even consider this an option. he is not looking out for our best interest. I cant wait til he is out of office.

[azdesertsnake01]

Originally Posted by chefchic ↗

32 states as of 10 a.m az time!! az says "no" to any coming here. Thank the Lord. Its a stupid move to allow any of these "refugees" in to our country. I understand they have to go some place, but not here, we need to get this isis isil problem taken care of first. let the bodies lie where they fall, they are in Gods hands. we cant put innocent lives here at risk to save other folks from other countries. we need to help wipe out isis, but we need to go there and do that, not bring them here to fight, its crazy to me that Obama would even consider this an option. he is not looking out for our best interest. I cant wait til he is out of office.

Yep, good news for AZ. I'm so fucking sick of us being the bread basket of the world that I get queasy just thinking about it.

The people of this country have given until we have nothing left to give. It's time for one of the many shit stinking muslim countries to take in their own.

[azdesertsnake01]

Originally Posted by rob666 ↗

I don't know why you are assuming that all Muslims are terrorists based on the actions of an extremely small percentage of them.

Do they teach math in Ontario? Or is it because you are speaking from the perspective of a JDL member? That is neither a logical conclusion or an accurate one.

They aren't all terrorists, but time and time again polls taken of muslims prove that a GREAT many of them at least support groups like isis, the taliban, etc.

So just because they aren't wearing a suicide vest it does NOT mean they are our friends. Islam like all organized religion is responsible directly or indirectly for AT LEAST 80% of the worlds problems throughout history.

As I always tell people, just turn off the tv, computer or whatever for 15 minutes and focus on nothing but asking yourself where the world would be right now if it weren't for organized religion holding it back.

From Galileo who lost precious years of his life to catholicism or be burned at the stake, to modern day scientists who can't convince christians that global warming is real, religion just sux cock to put it bluntly.

If it weren't for religion we would be thousands of years more advanced than we are now. Considering you can't even imagine technology 2 years ahead right now, it's literally not even fathomable where we would be if it weren't for religion.

The closest you can come to imagining it is that we would have conquered EVERYTHING so long ago, that the history of how it happened would be lost to time.

No diseases, we would be traveling to galaxies billions of light years away in an instant, step in and out of other alternate universes like changing a shoe, no need for lawyers, politicians, bankers, cops, and other criminals like them. You get the point! FUCK ISLAM!!!

[m1324]

Bread basket for taking in 10,000 (!) of them.

[Morbid75]

UPDATE: House Passes Bill in overwhelming majority to halt Syrian refugees from coming to the United States


SOURCE

House OKs bill that could limit Syrian, Iraqi refugees 02:24
Story highlights
The House easily passed a bill Thursday that would suspend the program allowing Syrian and Iraqi refugees into the U.S. until key national security agencies certify they don't pose a security risk
The vote was 289-137, with 47 Democrats joining 242 Republicans in favor of the bill
President Barack Obama has promised to veto the legislation
Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid said Democrats hope to block the bill

Washington (CNN)The House easily passed a bill Thursday that would suspend the program allowing Syrian and Iraqi refugees into the U.S. until key national security agencies certify they don't pose a security risk.

The vote was 289-137, with 47 Democrats joining 242 Republicans in favor of the bill, creating a majority that could override President Barack Obama's promised veto. It also faces an uncertain future in the Senate, where Minority Leader Harry Reid said he will try to block the bill.

The high number of Democrats voting against the White House is a clear sign Obama is increasingly isolated in his position on refugees in light of the ISIS terrorist attacks on Paris.

During his trip abroad this week, Obama has offered a forceful defense of the program and derided Republican opponents as being scared of "widows and orphans."

"We are not well served when, in response to a terrorist attack, we descend into fear and panic," Obama said in the Philippines on Wednesday. "We don't make good decisions if it's based on hysteria or an exaggeration of risks."

Republicans were determined to move quickly. House Speaker Paul Ryan told reporters "this is urgent. We cannot and should not wait to act, not when our national security is at stake."

The administration's veto threat "baffles me," Ryan said, "especially given the fact that his own law enforcement top officials came to Congress and testified that there are gaps in this refugee program."

Republicans also used the debate to criticize the president's approach to fighitng terrorism.

"The real problem is ISIL and the lack of a strategy," House Majority Leader Kevin McCarthy said, adding it was "astounding" the president has yet to lay out a comprehensive approach to the threat in the Middle East.

Obama administration officials have been lobbying Democrats to oppose the measure.

FBI Director James Comey has expressed deep concerns about the bill, two U.S. officials tell CNN. Comey has told administration and congressional officials that the legislation would make it impossible to allow any refugees into the U.S., and could even affect the ability of travelers from about three dozen countries that are allowed easier travel to the U.S. under the visa waiver program, the officials say.

There are always risks in allowing any foreigners into the U.S., Comey told the officials, adding that the FBI believes it has an effective process with intelligence and other agencies to conduct vetting of refugees.

Hillary Clinton calls for U.S. to 'intensify and broaden' efforts to fight ISIS

Reid says Democrats will block bill
It is unclear when the Senate will take up the measure, but Reid on Thursday said Democrats will attempt to block it.

"We've explained here in some detail. The problem is not with refugees," Reid said when asked if Democrats could support the House bill. "I don't think we will be dealing with it over here."

Reid's language suggests Democrats will use the power of their 46 seats to block the House bill from getting the 60 votes it would need to clear procedural hurdles in the Senate.

Senate Democrats told reporters they support two measures that would respond to the Paris attacks. One would prevent people who have been to Syria or Iraq in the last five years from entering the United States through the visa waiver program. The second would prevent people on the terrorism watch list from buying guns or explosives, something currently allowed, the Democrats said.

Moves from Rand Paul, Ted Cruz
Sen. Rand Paul, R-Kentucky, is now blocking progress on a spending bill for transportation and housing programs that is currently on the floor because he is insisting on getting a vote on his amendment that is aimed at preventing Syrian refugees from entering the United States.

GOP leaders and bill managers oppose having a refugee vote on this bill because they say it is unrelated and want to deal with that issue later.

Unless the GOP presidential candidate relents, this may delay passage of the underlying funding bill until after the Thanksgiving recess when Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell can take the time consuming procedural steps to overcome Paul's objections.

Also Thursday, Sen. Ted Cruz attempted to quickly move two bills of his that would address the refugee laws. One bill would force Americans who join overseas terrorist groups to renounce their U.S. citizenship; a second would "immediately bar refugees" from any country "including Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Syria, or Yemen, that contains territory substantially controlled by a foreign terrorist organization," with exceptions for groups that are victims of genocide, Cruz's office said.

The bills were blocked by Democrats who denied the Texas Republican's request for unanimous consent to pass the measures.

Ben Carson compares some refugees to 'rabid dogs'

Contentious meeting between White House and House Democrats
Earlier Thursday, White House Chief of Staff Denis McDonough and Department of Homeland Security Secretary Jeh Johnson faced strong resistance from House Democrats at a closed-door meeting. The goal was to explain how the refugee program worked, but their presentation did not "not going over well" and went "in the weeds," according to a Democratic source in the room.

This source said the "message on this is too complicated."

Could the government shut down over refugees?

Virginia Democratic Rep. Gerry Connolly, who was undecided on Wednesday, attended the morning briefing with McDonough and Johnson, but voted with Republicans for the bill after reviewing the bill's details. He told reporters "the administration representatives didn't really present a compelling and cogent reason to vote no."

"If you are going to send people home Thanksgiving week, you're going to have to justify why you voted no on the only piece of legislation in front of us post Paris and it was a fairly modest bill," Connolly said.

At the meeting with House Democrats, administration officials argued that a certification process included in the bill can't be done. But several Democrats countered that the President does certifications all the time.

New York Democratic Rep. Sean Patrick Maloney told Johnson that the issue is "toxic" and the administration arguments are "insufficient."

House Democratic leaders say they did not "whip" the bill or pressure members to back the administration.

House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi told members before the meeting to essentially vote their conscience on the bill, saying, "Nobody is asking you to do anything but listen."

Pelosi voted against the bill, saying it was a missed opportunity because Republicans didn't consult with Democrats on a bipartisan response to the Paris attacks.

"Count me as a lioness - anybody who comes near my cubs, you are dead," Pelosi said, but added the bill "sends the wrong message" about the United States' willingness to grant asylum to those fleeing war. Instead, the California Democrat argued there are more pressing issues like reforming the visa waiver program and making sure people on the terrorist watch list can't buy guns.

[Oswald2001]

Originally Posted by morbid75 ↗

UPDATE: House Passes Bill in overwhelming majority to halt Syrian refugees from coming to the United States


SOURCE

I find it hard to believe that US politicians have this much common sense.

And...possibly...dare I say...decency?

[rapeWhistle]

Originally Posted by bob351 ↗

Only a fool is compassionate all the time.


Some of the wealthiest muslim nations are doing next to nothing for their own brethren, yet you want us to feel bad about not letting refugees in when the terrorists are actively using it as a means to get into our nations?

Saudis have taken 0, kuwait 0, qatar 0, uae 0.

[rob666]

Originally Posted by azdesertsnake01 ↗

They aren't all terrorists, but time and time again polls taken of muslims prove that a GREAT many of them at least support groups like isis, the taliban, etc.

So just because they aren't wearing a suicide vest it does NOT mean they are our friends. Islam like all organized religion is responsible directly or indirectly for AT LEAST 80% of the worlds problems throughout history.

As I always tell people, just turn of the tv, computer or whatever for 15 minutes and focus on nothing but asking yourself where the world would be right now if it weren't for organized religion holding it back.

From Galileo who lost precious years of his life to catholicism or be burned at the stake, to modern day scientists who can't convince christians that global warming is real, religion just sux cock to put it bluntly.

If it weren't for religion we would be thousands of years more advanced than we are now. Considering you can't even imagine technology 2 years ahead right now, it's literally not even fathomable where we would be if it weren't for religion.

The closest you can come to imagining it is that we would have conquered EVERYTHING so long ago, that the history of how it happened would be lost to time.

No diseases, we would be traveling to galaxies billions of light years away in an instant, step in and out of other alternate universes like changing a shoe, no need for lawyers, politicians, bankers, cops, and other criminals like them. You get the point! FUCK ISLAM!!!

Bullshit.

You have issues.

[azdesertsnake01]

Originally Posted by rob666 ↗

Bullshit.

You have issues.

These bastards are going around shooting people in the streets and I have issues? You're good for a laugh rob. 6.5 billion people on the earth right now and EVERY ONE of them that isn't living in the jungle and isn't one of their supporters like yourself, is aware that these assholes are a worldwide problem.

For the first time in history even the U.S., china and russia are hinting at an alliance to deal with the problem.

It dominates the news daily as well as the politics of every civilized country. Yet I AM THE ONE with issues because I say they are assholes? ROFL.

So far I had thought you might have been intelligent with some of your previous posts, but this one just set you WAY back in my book. Lol.