|
#5
●
10-11-2011, 12:29 PM
|
|
Re: Supposed UFO Photographed
The easiest explanations for the so called BLURFOs (UFOs that get noticed only after you develop a film or download the pic to the pc) are almost always that 1) The camera does not work like the human eye, so what you see as some massive, sharp, sometimes even metallic in appearance in the photo, looked like something unnoticeable to the naked eye 2) The objects that are natural part of the environment get often totally unnoticed by the human eye: or better, the eye catches them but the brain dismissed them as nothing worthy to be reported to the brain, to put it in poor words. Birds, bugs and insects play a lead role in this branch of alleged UFO sightings, and there's a huge amounts of this type of reports: they don't fall to the "hoax" basket, almost always those who report these ones are genuinely believing they are on to something, which is perfectly understandable. In this case, iwould say that what we see is consistent with a seagull, or something not very different: i don'tknow what breed of birds you can find there, but that's my take on it: of course, i could be wrong. ![]() A, found a previous case from Cornwall: http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage...icle637499.ece Thanks for sharing, Kelly |