|
#13
●
11-06-2018, 05:22 PM
|
|
Re: Saudi Arabian Journalist Killed + Dismembered
He's not a US citizen and nothing happened on US soil, we don't have a Dog in this fight Saudis killing their own citizens, on their own soil is their prerogative. We call it "Executions" over here. |
|
#14
●
11-07-2018, 03:04 AM
|
|
Re: Saudi Arabian Journalist Killed + Dismembered
Kashoggi was a member and mouthpiece of the Muslim Brotherhood. Saudi Arabia, UAE, Bahrain and Eygpt consider them a terrorist group. They are of the Sharia Law way of islam and detest the western ties of the aforementioned countries. |
|
#15
●
11-07-2018, 08:52 AM
|
|
Re: Saudi Arabian Journalist Killed + Dismembered
Khashoggi was a supporter of both the Muslim Brotherhood and HAMAS. Khashoggi donated both time, money, and column space to advocating for HAMAS' war against Israel, writing that Israel should "die by force" and tweeted that [with respect to America]"Your 9/11 is our everyday." Yes, Khashoggi was a terror loving piece of shit. His death was a small improvement of the planet earth. The fact you don't know this doesn't make it not reality. Stop getting swept up in dumb propaganda bullshit. |
|
#16
●
11-08-2018, 08:33 AM
|
|
Re: Saudi Arabian Journalist Killed + Dismembered
I've removed all the corpse photos as they aren't him + Kellyhound has kindly moved this to the current news section.
__________________ "I'd give the world for the chance just to see your face again. Still I pretend that you're still standing by." |
|
#17
●
11-20-2018, 07:03 PM
| ||||||||
| ★ Legacy Member ★ Poster Rank:4142 Join Date: Nov 2009 Posts: 74 Mentioned: 0 Post(s) Quoted: 8 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: Saudi Arabian Journalist Killed + Dismembered
Fuck Israel. Fuck them to hell.
|
|
#18
●
02-26-2021, 01:44 AM
|
|
Re: Saudi Arabian Journalist Killed + Dismembered
US President Joe Biden is set to call Saudi Arabia’s King Salman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud on Wednesday, ahead of the scheduled release of a US intelligence report on the killing of Saudi journalist Jamal Khashoggi, according to a US news website. Citing a source, Axios said late on Tuesday that the “imminent release of the explosive report” could entangle one of the king’s sons without mentioning any names. The unclassified report from the US Office of the Director of National Intelligence (ODNI) is expected to support earlier findings by the CIA that Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman was behind Khashoggi’s murder. The call would be the first conversation between Biden, as US president, and King Salman, according to Axios. Other issues are likely to be discussed but the Khashoggi case could dominate the conversation, the news website said. Khashoggi, a Middle East Eye and Washington Post columnist who was critical of Saudi government policies, was assassinated by a team of Saudi agents at the country’s consulate in Istanbul in October 2018. US media outlets later reported that the CIA had concluded that the crown prince had ordered the killing. Bin Salman has denied the accusations but has accepted responsibility as the kingdom’s de facto leader. 'Without delay' Last month, US Congressman Adam Schiff, chair of the powerful House Intelligence Committee, welcomed the new US administration's pledge to release the declassified report on who killed Khashoggi, calling for the document to be made public "without delay". In a letter to the newly confirmed director of national intelligence, Avril Haines, Schiff said ensuring accountability for the murder had been a top bipartisan priority in Congress. Haines in January told lawmakers that her office would release a report naming the Saudi officials involved in the assassination, in compliance with legally binding congressional requests. Late in 2019, Congress had inserted a provision in the Pentagon budget, ordering the ODNI to submit to Congress within 30 days an unclassified report outlining "the advance knowledge and role" of any Saudi official in "the directing, ordering, or tampering of evidence in the killing of Khashoggi". However, the Trump administration refused to produce the report, arguing that releasing the information would compromise intelligence sources and methods. |