|
#53
●
11-13-2014, 09:55 AM
|
|
Re: ‘Officer of the Month’ Raped Girl At Gunpoint
Thing is, most officers (especially in today's incompetence in people) would have a reprimand sheet to go a long with their criminal charges. It is a good way to deface character since that is the narrative's objective to do so in the article. I'm quite sure you can find plenty of reprimands for Cops that banged their drunken seducers. Perhaps that was what he was expecting as a worse case scenario, or a "good ole boy" pat on the shoulder? Since after all, he i'm sure knew he was still under the radar. Don't get me wrong here, i don't think rape is right in anyway. I just keep an open mind to the fact of Men being falsely accused of rape, and how the evidence is easily stacked against them just over casual sex. It happens to regular men all over the country, why wouldn't it to a cop? I've read my fair share of Cop rapist articles. Most that I have read, the cops display more of a predatory action, more careful of their decisions. Most of their police maneuvers are un-reported (don't radio in the pull over) and many while off hours work. Most victims don't even know their assaulter's name. More times than none. the victims are beaten, handcuffed, and show clear signs of abuse. This guy's (even in the shitty biased article) sounds more like a dumb ass that took the opportunity to bang a drunk girl, who when sobered up lost it. |