[Desensitisation]

Originally Posted by Illusion ↗

If you dig deep enough you'll find someone getting mauled by a giant poodle. You're a smart guy. You know these isolated occurrences mean nothing. Shepherds and Dobermans only make up 1% of dog bite fatalities. Lets put this argument to rest.

I do agree with you. Pit-bull types will do a hell of a lot more damage, and more quickly, than most other breeds of dog out there.

The simple fact of the matter is, you need to look after the dog appropriately in order to prevent the bite from happening in the first place. Pit-bull types require smarter, more diligent owners than most other breeds of dog because of all the factors that make them, on average, a more dangerous dog than others.

But people are still fucking morons even with the most "bomb-proof" of dogs because they don't look at the dog... they look at the breed, and think, "Oh, that breed could NEVER be dangerous." Conversely, I see everyone shit their pants when they come across a pit-bull type because, "HOLY SHIT it's a PIT BULL FUCKING KILL IT!" when the dog is as placid as you can want.

Only idiots think they can solve a problem by targeting an entire breed of dog. Sure, if the breed didn't exist in the first place, it can't bite anyone... but then the next dog in line will become "the biter", and on and on you go until you have nothing left at all, pretty much like what those fuckwits at PETA would like to see happen.

[Pigeon]

I thought this was going to be one of those cases of someone dying of natural causes and their corpse getting eaten by their dogs, but defensive wounds speak for themselves. Not the way I wanna go, that's for sure.

[vagabond]

Pretty awful, if thet are truly defensive wounds. I like Oswald's theory.

[Illusion]

Originally Posted by Desensitisation ↗

I do agree with you. Pit-bull types will do a hell of a lot more damage, and more quickly, than most other breeds of dog out there.

The simple fact of the matter is, you need to look after the dog appropriately in order to prevent the bite from happening in the first place. Pit-bull types require smarter, more diligent owners than most other breeds of dog because of all the factors that make them, on average, a more dangerous dog than others.

But people are still fucking morons even with the most "bomb-proof" of dogs because they don't look at the dog... they look at the breed, and think, "Oh, that breed could NEVER be dangerous." Conversely, I see everyone shit their pants when they come across a pit-bull type because, "HOLY SHIT it's a PIT BULL FUCKING KILL IT!" when the dog is as placid as you can want.

Only idiots think they can solve a problem by targeting an entire breed of dog. Sure, if the breed didn't exist in the first place, it can't bite anyone... but then the next dog in line will become "the biter", and on and on you go until you have nothing left at all, pretty much like what those fuckwits at PETA would like to see happen.

Agreed. The best action we can effectuate for communities and pit bulls is to regulate pit bull ownership and pit bull breeding. Lowering the pit bull population will reduce the number of serious maulings and the euthanasia of pit bulls.

[Illusion]

Originally Posted by wmbondurant ↗

http://www.dogsbite.org/dog-bite-sta...ities-2016.php

Thank you for proving my point, good sir.. This is an exceptional website for anyone interested on becoming a dangerous dog owner. Educate yourself first.

1. Pit-bull genetics
2. Absence of regulation/training/education
3. Idiot owners

It's not even debatable.