[niknik]

So what you're saying is you think there's no law protecting women in the workforce?

[Mr Poo]

Originally Posted by niknik ↗

So what you're saying is you think there's no law protecting women in the workforce?

There is no law that we enforce requiring equal pay regardless of sex across the nation, that's correct. The EPA through EEOC doesn't enforce it, that's why there are pay dependencies for the same jobs with the same experience.

[niknik]

Your numbers you posted are also inaccurate.

[niknik]

Originally Posted by Mr Poo ↗

There is no law that we enforce requiring equal pay regardless of sex across the nation, that's correct. The EPA through EEOC doesn't enforce it, that's why there are pay dependencies for the same jobs with the same experience.

[K9Grip]

Nothing is good enough for these idiots and they will go after every little detail to try and get revenge on those they feel are responsible for Wilson not being indicted. Are they going to go after every witness who didn't say Mike Brown was a saint?

Is M Brown's mom going to face charges for stealing all those t-shirts? What about those looters? What about those assholes that murdered the 19 yr old kid in his car because he was a grand jury witness? I won't hold my breath.

[Mr Poo]

Originally Posted by niknik ↗

Your numbers you posted are also inaccurate.

Oh the numbers are currently 77 cents to every dollar, instead of 75.5?

[niknik]

Originally Posted by Mr Poo ↗

Oh the numbers are currently 77 cents to every dollar, instead of 75.5?

No that's not it. It's a number that doesn't account for any circumstances. Like men work more hours than women on average as well.

[Mr Poo]

Originally Posted by niknik ↗

No that's not it. It's a number that doesn't account for any circumstances. Like men work more hours than women on average as well.

They do account for that..

[niknik]

Your graphs don't prove what you claim they do. It just takes the average weekly earnings. If I work more hours, I get paid more.

If companies really paid women less for the exact same job and same hours. Then why would companies even hire men? They could just hire women to work for cheaper. But they don't, because you're war on women premise is total bs.
There's many factors that go into pay scales, experience, education, how valuable the company thinks you are to them, and your output.
Your graphs are merely tools of politics, that's all.

[Mr Poo]

Originally Posted by niknik ↗

Your graphs don't prove what you claim they do. It just takes the average weekly earnings. If I work more hours, I get paid more.

If companies really paid women less for the exact same job and same hours. Then why would companies even hire men? They could just hire women to work for cheaper. But they don't, because you're war on women premise is total bs.
There's many factors that go into pay scales, experience, education, how valuable the company thinks you are to them, and your output.
Your graphs are merely tools of politics, that's all.

The graphs are the numbers represented graphically, not a tool of politics..

In the "tool of politics" everyone was full time wage workers and salary earners. The facts are the facts, women get paid less than men for the same jobs. You can't debate that fact.