ISIS Says It Killed 4 Cyclists in Tajikistan

[azdesertsnake01]

Copying a leftist news article doesn’t prove anything. These are the same people who said Hillary had a 98% chance of winning the election and Trump was in Russia having prostitutes piss on him. So, I have no respect for them. No offense, but it sounds like there are a lot of things you need to learn about before you enter into debating politics. If you choose to go left, you don’t need to learn about much though. Just say everything is racist and sexist and ignore any and all facts and you will fit right in.

I sometimes wonder if I am the only person on earth who can use a search engine when I get asked for proof of something that a 3 second web search can reveal.

Search for “black lives matter lincoln statue” and as far as the left hating America, what do you think burning the American flag and destroying the statues and reputations of the founding fathers is about? The list is endless. From being anti free speech, anti gun, to anti anything else in the constitution. Asking for proof of this is like a fish swimming in the ocean while saying water? I don’t believe in it. Prove it!

[wickedlara]

Originally Posted by azdesertsnake01

No offense, but it sounds like there are a lot of things you need to learn about before you enter into debating politics.

I didn't know that if YOU don't have "respect" a source it is invalid. Are you saying the AP predicted Clinton winning? BTW, she did get three million more votes. Of course, we do KNOW that Russia interfered in the election. Do you consider AP liberal? Don't you think most of the media is leaning right or right wing? They are rich corporations and sponsored by giant corporations.

The world is changing. Scream all you want but it won't stop for you. It might not be the best way for it to go, but it won't veer from this new course. Adjust or get left behind.

Lincoln was pretty awful in many ways as a president. The draft being a great example.

You don't like me quoting a established newspaper for support; you just offer your opinion that is not supported. You don't like burning the flag, but the Supreme Court ruled that it was free speech. So you are against free speech. Yet you accuse the left of being anti free speech.

The founding fathers were just people. If people expose their sins, it is just the truth surfacing. It is not a big deal if they raped their slaves or whatever is the charge. They are gone and it is a different time. The world moves.

[Castiel1412]

Originally Posted by wickedlara

I didn't know that if YOU don't have "respect" a source it is invalid. Are you saying the AP predicted Clinton winning? BTW, she did get three million more votes. Of course, we do KNOW that Russia interfered in the election. Do you consider AP liberal? Don't you think most of the media is leaning right or right wing? They are rich corporations and sponsored by giant corporations.

The world is changing. Scream all you want but it won't stop for you. It might not be the best way for it to go, but it won't veer from this new course. Adjust or get left behind.

Lincoln was pretty awful in many ways as a president. The draft being a great example.

You don't like me quoting a established newspaper for support; you just offer your opinion that is not supported. You don't like burning the flag, but the Supreme Court ruled that it was free speech. So you are against free speech. Yet you accuse the left of being anti free speech.

The founding fathers were just people. If people expose their sins, it is just the truth surfacing. It is not a big deal if they raped their slaves or whatever is the charge. They are gone and it is a different time. The world moves.

Let's revive this thread, you seem like an ordinary mainstream person, without any clue at all.
AP is left as leaning as 90% of the others. Basically if you'r looking for facts, you don't wanna search them in places where words like "Press" or "Fact-check" exist.

[Castiel1412]

Originally Posted by wickedlara

You don't like me quoting a established newspaper for support; you just offer your opinion that is not supported.

As you said the World is changing. It's 2021 and you'r lovely established newspaper is just offering their opinion based on their political stance. That's what i call "not supported". If you'r thinking MSM belives in Journalism ethics and Moral standards of the past you should first quote yourself about how times change and the World is moving, even if you don't like it or won't accept it. You'r the one in denial of changing times.