|
#21
●
03-23-2014, 04:52 PM
|
|
Re: FGM: UK's First Female Genital Mutilation Prosecutions Announced
I don't think I would have opted for circumcision if I had been given the choice, but I do like the aesthetics of my donger. I try to imagine what it would be like to have foreskin, and it just seems weird to me. That said, were I to have a son, I wouldn't get him circumcised unless it really mattered to his mother that he was. I've seen some real ugly results from botched circumcisions, and it's a bullet I'm glad that I dodged; I couldn't in good conscience decide to subject my own child to such a risk. |
|
#22
●
03-23-2014, 05:02 PM
| ||||||||
| ★ Legacy Member ★ Poster Rank:12 Join Date: Jun 2009 Posts: 81,663 Mentioned: 282 Post(s) Quoted: 32531 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: FGM: UK's First Female Genital Mutilation Prosecutions Announced
I still regard it as mutilation unless there is a sound medical reason for it before the child reaches adulthood.
|
|
#23
●
03-24-2014, 05:25 PM
|
|
Re: FGM: UK's First Female Genital Mutilation Prosecutions Announced
My brother was circumcised when he was 17/18/19 because he couldn't piss straight. I'm sure there's more to it than that but he cited it as a reason. Whenever my foreskin rolls back in my boxers it feels weird as fuck, I dunno how y'all can cope without one. I could do without pubes getting stuck in it though, to be fair. |