[DiamondSmiles]

Originally Posted by wujuan ↗

they are the offical ones. if anybody can find them that would be way awesum.

They were fosted on facebook.

Figures fucking zuckerberg takes them down, but, leaves that annoying timeline! Hate that! He took down the cropping feature I liked, too!

[Vedderman]

Originally Posted by dean mclean ↗

Would the site's proprieter be held accountable for what members do though? I think part of the reason that NTFU got shut down and this site is still standing is because NTFU was displaying gore and porn on the same site, whereas this site aims to be a "news" site of sorts, and most obscenity statutes hinge around sexuality. But I'm not sure if the actions of posters would be considered part of the "work as a whole" that obscenity laws would be evaluating.

Logic and reason would concur with your thoughts on the subject. Unfortunately, many Obscenity statutes are so reprehensibly over-broad that there's no telling just how a ruling would come down. It has gone (and will go again) both ways, though most of the time you are correct. I wasn't trying to point out bullshit obscenity charges as a 'normal' result from such postings, but just wanted to convey that there was always a CHANCE according to the ambiguous 'letter' of an overbroad law that you could catch a charge of this nature. Especially if people on the site respond in an overtly sexual manner to the post and you do not take pains to remove it in the wake of that. It is certainly a 'worst case' scenario, but the risk is always there.

[jaymillz8p]

Who cares

[r0tten]

Originally Posted by jaymillz8p ↗

Who cares

You probably should since you're on this site. And if you live in America, this is far too close to censorship of actual real world news than I am comfortable with.