|
#8
●
11-18-2013, 02:55 AM
|
|
Re: Chinese Website Under Fire for Selling 'infant Sex Dolls'
No offense, but I consider that theory to be an excuse purported by defense attorneys in an attempt to shift blame away from their clients by claiming they weren't fully responsible for their behavior. "That darn porno started this mess!" It's the classic red herring |
|
#10
●
11-18-2013, 11:17 PM
|
|
Re: Chinese Website Under Fire for Selling 'infant Sex Dolls'
I see what you're saying but that wasn't what I meant by that. Of course they are 100% responsible for their actions. I don't care if they have urges to abuse children. They can control their actions. It's sick and they should be locked up. I'm just saying that sometimes criminals escalate. Such as, peeping Tom's can escalate into breaking into homes and sexually assaulting a person, which can possibly lead to them breaking in, sexually assaulting and killing a person. I just mean that if a person were to use this doll as a substitute for a real child, there might come a day when the doll just isn't doing it for them. In any case, if someone does hurt a child they should be locked up. The doll is a different story. I just wish people like that didn't exist in the first place. |