[güttsfükk]

May 2012 Update

A London Underground passenger has been jailed for 21 weeks after she admitted hurling racist abuse at fellow passengers.

Jacqueline Woodhouse, 42, of Romford, east London, directed an expletive-ridden rant at Tube passengers on the Central line on 23 January.

A seven-minute video of the verbal assault was uploaded to YouTube.

She received a 21-week prison sentence and a five-year Asbo at Westminster Magistrates' Court.

Woodhouse admitted racially aggravated intentional harassment, at the court, earlier in May.

The prosecution offered no evidence on a separate charge of racially aggravated common assault.

'Sense of shame'

The court heard she stumbled over a black woman named Judy Russell as she boarded the carriage and proceeded to hurl insults, shouting: "You Africans take our council flats."

The video shows Galbant Juttla, who filmed the incident on his mobile phone, telling Woodhouse to keep her mouth shut and that she had had too much to drink.

"It's not your country anyway so what's your problem?" she said.

"It's been overtaken by people like you."

In further remarks, on a packed train between St Paul's and Mile End stations, she told passengers: "I'll have you arrested because you don't live here" and "I hope you are not claiming benefits."

The video of the verbal assault was viewed on YouTube more than 200,000 times.

Woodhouse handed herself into police, telling officers she could not remember the comments but recognised herself in the video.

Following the hearing, Mr Juttla, of Ilford, east London, said: "I found it very distressing.

"I uploaded it [the footage] to YouTube because I thought that was the fast-track process to catching this person.

"I also needed to show the public that kind of person is out there and not to put up with this kind of behaviour.

"My kids have seen the video and they are disgusted by it."

Condemning Woodhouse's outburst, District Judge Michael Snow said: "Anyone viewing it would feel a deep sense of shame that our citizens could be subject to such behaviour who may, as a consequence, believe that it secretly represents the views of other white people.

'Grossly offensive'

"The train was packed with people from a variety of ethnic backgrounds," he added. "The people included children."

"She became loud, foul-mouthed and aggressive. She targeted her behaviour at those who weren't white.

"She threatened violence against more than one person and it took place over a prolonged period."

He added her "grossly offensive" language reflected her hostility to her fellow passengers.

The judge told Woodhouse she would serve half her prison term behind bars and imposed an order banning her from using the Tube and the Docklands Light Railway while drunk, for a five-year period.

source : http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-18251807









oh dear

A woman has been arrested after video footage apparently showing ethnic minority Tube passengers being racially abused was posted online.

The alleged abuse was recorded on a packed Central Line train between St Paul's and Mile End stations on 23 January, police said.

A 42-year-old from Romford was arrested on suspicion of racially aggravated common assault and a racially aggravated public order offence.

The woman remains in police custody.

She was arrested after attending a police station in Essex, British Transport Police said.

Officers said they were notified about the video on YouTube on 24 January.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-london-16932948

[BigFoot]

The cameraman sounds like a British Mickie Mouse.

[SeaGrave]

What a barbaric cunt.

[kellyhound]

i bet she has a big black dildo at home.
i mean i fucking bet she fucking has a big fucking black dildo at fucking home.

[stephaniewalker]

Well a lot of people feel the way this woman does...They just keep it to them selves.

[Pig_fucker]

She's under the influence of alcohol, shit happens. She's allowed to speak her mind!

[johnleeknoefler]

Originally Posted by Pig_fucker ↗

She's under the influence of alcohol, shit happens. She's allowed to speak her mind!

The immigrants can beat up, rob, rape, kill and take over the homes of native Brits and that's ok. But let a Brit complain and they can go to jail just for saying.
Immigrants here in USA can be some real assholes as well. Unfortunately this woman thought she actually had free speech.

[slash4321]

Originally Posted by johnleeknoefler ↗

The immigrants can beat up, rob, rape, kill and take over the homes of native Brits and that's ok. But let a Brit complain and they can go to jail just for saying.
Immigrants here in USA can be some real assholes as well. Unfortunately this woman thought she actually had free speech.

I have to disagree John. She's clearly inciting racial hatred, which should never be protected as 'free speech'. Of course, freedom of speech is undeniably necessary in a democratic society, but, protecting someone from using nothing more than racial slurs and inciting hatred towards a particular race is NOT necessary in a deomcratic society.

The judgement in Glimmerveen and Hagenbeek v The Netherlands (1982) 4 EHRR 260 makes a very good point on this - in reference to the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) - that the views held by the appellant were not protected speech as per Article 10 of the ECHR because in effect, those views would contribute to the destruction of the rights and freedoms of others - which is contrary to Article 17 of the ECHR.

I think there is a fine line between what should be protected speech and what clearly shouldn't. I would also recommend the judgements in Lehideux v France and Norwood v UK on what should and shouldn't be covered by free speech.

With regards to immigrants being allowed to 'rape, kill etc', I think that's a bit of a hyperbole! Usually stories about immigrants getting away with this and that are largely apocryphal.

Sorry for the rant; I find Human Rights law very interesting!

[johnleeknoefler]

Originally Posted by slash4321 ↗

I have to disagree John. She's clearly inciting racial hatred, which should never be protected as 'free speech'. Of course, freedom of speech is undeniably necessary in a democratic society, but, protecting someone from using nothing more than racial slurs and inciting hatred towards a particular race is NOT necessary in a deomcratic society.

The judgement in Glimmerveen and Hagenbeek v The Netherlands (1982) 4 EHRR 260 makes a very good point on this - in reference to the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) - that the views held by the appellant were not protected speech as per Article 10 of the ECHR because in effect, those views would contribute to the destruction of the rights and freedoms of others - which is contrary to Article 17 of the ECHR.

I think there is a fine line between what should be protected speech and what clearly shouldn't. I would also recommend the judgements in Lehideux v France and Norwood v UK on what should and shouldn't be covered by free speech.

With regards to immigrants being allowed to 'rape, kill etc', I think that's a bit of a hyperbole! Usually stories about immigrants getting away with this and that are largely apocryphal.

Sorry for the rant; I find Human Rights law very interesting!

Just to be fair I decided to post some real Brit Racism for you. It's true that native Brits are fed up with the massive immigration and are learning to fight back and harrass "asians" as you call them so dishonestly. They are muslims. Pakistani, Afghan, Turkish, or whatever muslim they come from. The confusion caused by calling them asian is deliberate. It's done to hide the fact of their ethnicity and origins.

More news reports calling Pakistanis "asians". Don't dare call them muslims or pakis.

So tell me... were any of these racist "asians" arrested for terrorist threats? No? But a lone woman expressing her feelings on a public bus is branded a racist and jailed. You Brits got it coming to you now. You will get what you deserve.

Islam is a hateful religion. It teaches hate. Rape, dishonesty, theft and murder. There is no doubt of this. The fact that British are rising up and fighting back shows that they are opening their eyes. The Brits are learning to not tolerate intolerance.

Media Spin

[Zambini]

So much for free speech in the U.K