"Today Ira Isaacs, a self-described "shock artist," was sentenced to four years in federal prison for shocking people a little too much. Evidence presented at trial established that beginning in or about 1999 and continuing until at least 2011, Isaacs, doing business under the name LA. Media, operated numerous websites, through which he advertised and sold obscene videos that he acquired from other people. The obscene videos included a video approximately two hours in length of a female engaging in sex acts involving human bodily waste and a video one hour and 37 minutes in length of a female engaged in sex acts with animals. The evidence presented at trial also established that in approximately 2004, Isaacs began operating under the name Stolen Car Films and made obscene videos in which he instructed women to engage in sexual activity involving human bodily waste. Federal prosecutors had to try Isaacs three times before winning a conviction. According to Morality in Media, Isaacs' sentence "sends a strong message to the porn industry and to the U.S. Department of Justice that the sexual exploitation of women by pornographers is wrong."* Where do we draw the line for what's acceptable in "shock porn?" Where is the line between art and obscenity? That's what the maker of "2 Girls 1 Cup" is asking after he was sentenced to prison for obscenity. http://reason.com/blog/2013/01/16/fillmmaker-gets-four-years-in-prison-for" /> "Today Ira Isaacs, a self-described "shock artist," was sentenced to four years in federal prison for shocking people a little too much. Evidence presented at trial established that beginning in or about 1999 and continuing until at least 2011, Isaacs, doing business under the name LA. Media, operated numerous websites, through which he advertised and sold obscene videos that he acquired from other people. The obscene videos included a video approximately two hours in length of a female engaging in sex acts involving human bodily waste and a video one hour and 37 minutes in length of a female engaged in sex acts with animals. The evidence presented at trial also established that in approximately 2004, Isaacs began operating under the name Stolen Car Films and made obscene videos in which he instructed women to engage in sexual activity involving human bodily waste. Federal prosecutors had to try Isaacs three times before winning a conviction. According to Morality in Media, Isaacs' sentence "sends a strong message to the porn industry and to the U.S. Department of Justice that the sexual exploitation of women by pornographers is wrong."* Where do we draw the line for what's acceptable in "shock porn?" Where is the line between art and obscenity? That's what the maker of "2 Girls 1 Cup" is asking after he was sentenced to prison for obscenity. http://reason.com/blog/2013/01/16/fillmmaker-gets-four-years-in-prison-for" />
|
#1
●
01-18-2013, 12:32 AM
|
|
"2 Girls 1 Cup' Filmmaker Sentenced to Prison
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/ltjvhqE3gQE" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe> "Today Ira Isaacs, a self-described "shock artist," was sentenced to four years in federal prison for shocking people a little too much. Evidence presented at trial established that beginning in or about 1999 and continuing until at least 2011, Isaacs, doing business under the name LA. Media, operated numerous websites, through which he advertised and sold obscene videos that he acquired from other people. The obscene videos included a video approximately two hours in length of a female engaging in sex acts involving human bodily waste and a video one hour and 37 minutes in length of a female engaged in sex acts with animals. The evidence presented at trial also established that in approximately 2004, Isaacs began operating under the name Stolen Car Films and made obscene videos in which he instructed women to engage in sexual activity involving human bodily waste. Federal prosecutors had to try Isaacs three times before winning a conviction. According to Morality in Media, Isaacs' sentence "sends a strong message to the porn industry and to the U.S. Department of Justice that the sexual exploitation of women by pornographers is wrong."* Where do we draw the line for what's acceptable in "shock porn?" Where is the line between art and obscenity? That's what the maker of "2 Girls 1 Cup" is asking after he was sentenced to prison for obscenity. http://reason.com/blog/2013/01/16/fi...-in-prison-for |
|
#4
●
01-18-2013, 09:58 PM
|
|
Re: "2 Girls 1 Cup' Filmmaker Sentenced to Prison
How is it any of the Federal Government's business if someone engages in sexual activity involving human bodily waste? |
|
#6
●
01-19-2013, 02:44 AM
|
|
Re: "2 Girls 1 Cup' Filmmaker Sentenced to Prison
So this guy is going to prison for the same amount of time that someone would who was driving drunk and killed someone. Justice again |
|
#7
●
01-19-2013, 09:18 AM
|
|
Re: "2 Girls 1 Cup' Filmmaker Sentenced to Prison
I can understand the animal stuff but as already stated WTF is wrong with someone playing with human waste?? I find it discusting but who am I to dictate what someone else can and cant do in the bedroom (or recording studio!) bet he wishes that the clip didnt go viral now though
|
|
#9
●
01-19-2013, 12:34 PM
| ||||||||
| So Fucking Banned Poster Rank:333 Male Join Date: Mar 2010 Posts: 3,852 Mentioned: 13 Post(s) Quoted: 750 Post(s)
| ||||||||
|
Re: "2 Girls 1 Cup' Filmmaker Sentenced to Prison
mmmmm, cup o' poop. You'll never look at chocolate moose in the same way again. |