[targetless]

Violent aggression in Trappeto (Palermo, Sicily - Italy). A group of people of all ages, even two women, blocked and rammed a van in which some immigrants were traveling. They threatened them with a gun, then chased and beaten. "Shitty *******, you must die, by tonight we will kill you all".
The police in Palermo have arrested seven people, who will now have to respond to the charge of aggravated injuries for the purpose of ethnic and racial hatred.

[19fenrir86]

[Mr_Shlaapu]

Italy is fed up with immigration big time.

[foxracing]

just like America, were fed up with illegal immigrant garbage trashing our country

[souris]

what's wrong with taking back your own country?

[Yanni]

Originally Posted by souris ↗

what's wrong with taking back your own country?

"taking back" from whom...?

Variety in Ancient "Italy"
From pre-Roman times, it appears there was already a clear distinction of short, darker-skinned, dark-haired peoples from pre-history being overlayed and mixed with taller, sometimes larger built, blond and blue-eyed groups. For instance, the Etruscans, in what is now Northern Italy, did not speak an Indo-European language.

The Etruscans may have been there before the Indo-Europeans arrived. Some scholars suggest they were thought to have been a blond, blue-eyed people. On a mural in an Etruscan tomb, a banquet scene portrays the women with blond hair.* It could indicate the existence of some blond individuals among the Etruscans. Since it is only women who ware portrayed with blond hair, this could also represent bleaching, or could be a stylistic motif.

The Etruscans are the source of the Latin alphabet we use. They borrowed the alphabet of the Greeks and modified it to match their own language before the neighbouring Latin tribe became literate. The Latins, coming to be known as the Romans from their original city, borrowed the Etruscan alphabet and again slightly modified it to suit the sounds of their language.

It is now generally believed that the Greeks also were larger, blond and blue-eyed people, which was the case when Alexander the Great spread his forces and opened up colonies all over the Middle East and Egypt. This is also attested in frescos from the era, as well as in various references to their looks. Do some searching on the Internet and you will find various sources and studies on this.

This may strike us as odd today, since in modern times we think of the Greeks as shorter, darker people, not too different from the Italians. There are blond Greeks, though, as well as Turks.

Centuries before the rise of the Latins, or the establishment of Rome, Greeks already had colonies and trading centres all over the Italian coast, Sicily, and other islands, and all along the Iberian and North Africa coast. This went into the mix of peoples later considered Italian. Were these ancient Greek-speaking (from around 750 BC or earlier) dark or light? But we would likely consider them Caucasian.

Northern Italy was later home to the invading German groups, from times before the development of the Roman Empire, but particularly in the period from the 300s in our era. This introduced another light genetic strain in to the Italian genetic stream.

Germans settled in Iberia and all the way into Northern Africa, resulting in the blue-eyed and lighter-skinned Berber groups in North Africa. Even more recently in history, another primarily blond strain was added to the Italian mix, from the Viking Normans, who, after conquering England in 1066, became an ethnicity of nobles ruling all of Europe, Russia and much of the Middle East in the Middle Ages.

The point of this is that, in fact, not all Italians are dark. In fact, the term "Italian," as we use and know it today, is primarily a geopolitical designation, although it carries some ethnic and linguistic connotations also. Italy is the name of a peninsula. Italy as a political entity goes back only to 1861.

Additional ethnic strains added to the vibrant variation in the "Italian" genetic stream. Some were darker toned in color. There were Arab colonies in the Italic peninsula and islands off Italy were ruled by Arabs for centuries. Such is still the case in Malta, whose people are partly of Bedouin origin, though ethnically mixed with other peoples, and still speaking a language (Maltese) closely related to Arabic.

This article is not focusing on the Maltese, but a few comments along the lines mentioned might be of interest. I have been to Malta several times, and studied Maltese sources, as well as international sources on Maltese history and the broader history of the region. Maltese retains much of the original Arabic character. But the mix of the various peoples that make up the Maltese shows up also in the language vocabulary.

The language is classified in the Arabic family of languages, which includes 35 languages, most referred to by the term Arabic, with some descriptive term. While in the country once with an Egyptian friend with no previously knowledge of Maltese, he commented that he could vaguely make out the language. It was not easy to hear, he said, but he could recognize most of the vocabulary, and negotiate somewhat in oral conversation with Maltese using his Egyptian Arabic.

Sources, both Maltese and otherwise, differ on their opinion of how much of the Maltese culture and genetic mix derives from the Arab conquerors in the 800s. An Australian correspondent, of partial Maltese extraction, has referred to some of the many recent genetic studies that indicate the Maltese show a similar genetic signature to other Central Mediterraneans. But he likewise notes that this Central set of characteristics is distinct from West Mediterraneans, East Mediterraneans and North Africans. This is consistent with what we know of cultural history in the region.

At any rate, the Arab Empire that included Malta and Sicily included much of the Italian peninsula and other islands in the area. (The rulers of Spain were overthrown by a Moorish dynasty and were a separate Empire from that which included Sicily and southern Italy. In fact these two kingdoms were periodically at war with each other as well as with other parts of the Arab-Muslim world.)

http://orvillejenkins.com/peoples/italiansrace.html

[Keydog]

Europe's fucked

[Johnny Alias]

Originally Posted by Yanni ↗

"taking back" from whom...?

Variety in Ancient "Italy"
From pre-Roman times, it appears there was already a clear distinction of short, darker-skinned, dark-haired peoples from pre-history being overlayed and mixed with taller, sometimes larger built, blond and blue-eyed groups. For instance, the Etruscans, in what is now Northern Italy, did not speak an Indo-European language.

The Etruscans may have been there before the Indo-Europeans arrived. Some scholars suggest they were thought to have been a blond, blue-eyed people. On a mural in an Etruscan tomb, a banquet scene portrays the women with blond hair.* It could indicate the existence of some blond individuals among the Etruscans. Since it is only women who ware portrayed with blond hair, this could also represent bleaching, or could be a stylistic motif.

The Etruscans are the source of the Latin alphabet we use. They borrowed the alphabet of the Greeks and modified it to match their own language before the neighbouring Latin tribe became literate. The Latins, coming to be known as the Romans from their original city, borrowed the Etruscan alphabet and again slightly modified it to suit the sounds of their language.

It is now generally believed that the Greeks also were larger, blond and blue-eyed people, which was the case when Alexander the Great spread his forces and opened up colonies all over the Middle East and Egypt. This is also attested in frescos from the era, as well as in various references to their looks. Do some searching on the Internet and you will find various sources and studies on this.

This may strike us as odd today, since in modern times we think of the Greeks as shorter, darker people, not too different from the Italians. There are blond Greeks, though, as well as Turks.

Centuries before the rise of the Latins, or the establishment of Rome, Greeks already had colonies and trading centres all over the Italian coast, Sicily, and other islands, and all along the Iberian and North Africa coast. This went into the mix of peoples later considered Italian. Were these ancient Greek-speaking (from around 750 BC or earlier) dark or light? But we would likely consider them Caucasian.

Northern Italy was later home to the invading German groups, from times before the development of the Roman Empire, but particularly in the period from the 300s in our era. This introduced another light genetic strain in to the Italian genetic stream.

Germans settled in Iberia and all the way into Northern Africa, resulting in the blue-eyed and lighter-skinned Berber groups in North Africa. Even more recently in history, another primarily blond strain was added to the Italian mix, from the Viking Normans, who, after conquering England in 1066, became an ethnicity of nobles ruling all of Europe, Russia and much of the Middle East in the Middle Ages.

The point of this is that, in fact, not all Italians are dark. In fact, the term "Italian," as we use and know it today, is primarily a geopolitical designation, although it carries some ethnic and linguistic connotations also. Italy is the name of a peninsula. Italy as a political entity goes back only to 1861.

Additional ethnic strains added to the vibrant variation in the "Italian" genetic stream. Some were darker toned in color. There were Arab colonies in the Italic peninsula and islands off Italy were ruled by Arabs for centuries. Such is still the case in Malta, whose people are partly of Bedouin origin, though ethnically mixed with other peoples, and still speaking a language (Maltese) closely related to Arabic.

This article is not focusing on the Maltese, but a few comments along the lines mentioned might be of interest. I have been to Malta several times, and studied Maltese sources, as well as international sources on Maltese history and the broader history of the region. Maltese retains much of the original Arabic character. But the mix of the various peoples that make up the Maltese shows up also in the language vocabulary.

The language is classified in the Arabic family of languages, which includes 35 languages, most referred to by the term Arabic, with some descriptive term. While in the country once with an Egyptian friend with no previously knowledge of Maltese, he commented that he could vaguely make out the language. It was not easy to hear, he said, but he could recognize most of the vocabulary, and negotiate somewhat in oral conversation with Maltese using his Egyptian Arabic.

Sources, both Maltese and otherwise, differ on their opinion of how much of the Maltese culture and genetic mix derives from the Arab conquerors in the 800s. An Australian correspondent, of partial Maltese extraction, has referred to some of the many recent genetic studies that indicate the Maltese show a similar genetic signature to other Central Mediterraneans. But he likewise notes that this Central set of characteristics is distinct from West Mediterraneans, East Mediterraneans and North Africans. This is consistent with what we know of cultural history in the region.

At any rate, the Arab Empire that included Malta and Sicily included much of the Italian peninsula and other islands in the area. (The rulers of Spain were overthrown by a Moorish dynasty and were a separate Empire from that which included Sicily and southern Italy. In fact these two kingdoms were periodically at war with each other as well as with other parts of the Arab-Muslim world.)

http://orvillejenkins.com/peoples/italiansrace.html

That’s the whole point, the Italians want to take back THEIR country so they do t join the long list of extinct nations in your detailed list

Your own list proves what the Italians fear most