|
#3
●
07-07-2023, 05:09 PM
|
|
Re: Lifeguard Vs. Beachgoers Over No Smoking Zone
I think it should be the woman's job to turn to the cat caller and say, "Fuck off!" if it's unwanted. If he truly sexually harrasses her by exposing himself or being outrageously vulgar in his cat calling, then you do it the brazilian, russian and/or mexican-style and take it out on his hide |
|
#8
●
07-07-2023, 10:36 PM
|
|
Re: Lifeguard Vs. Beachgoers Over No Smoking Zone
So it was over smoking? Why did she say she was 'sexually harassed'? I wonder if she was trying to turn the tables to get him in trouble instead. |
|
#9
●
07-07-2023, 10:49 PM
|
| My Rank: CORPORAL Poster Rank:1345 Join Date: Dec 2009 Posts: 452 452Posts 1,352Thanked 152Quoted 0Mentioned 0Contrib. |
|
Re: Lifeguard Vs. Beachgoers Over No Smoking Zone
Lifeguard is a tank
|
|
#10
●
07-08-2023, 04:48 PM
|
|
Re: Lifeguard Vs. Beachgoers Over No Smoking Zone
Because she's a fat ugly cunt that saw too many #MeToo tweets and was more concerned with herself than the guy with her who was laying there apparently gravely injured.
|