[AnonymWarDoll]

Not Even Animals behave like that Monsters All of them.

Humans = Pest
Corona = Pest Control

[AnonymWarDoll]

FCKING hate all Humans

FUN FUN FUN FUN !

Sex SEX Sex SEX !

GO EXTINCT YOU FREAKS !


NO HEARTH NO SOUL NO CONSCIOUSNESS !

[Spiffyfable]

Next level cat fighting there

[Killgaad]

Originally Posted by 18Zulu ↗

I’m not gay but I thgink I love you

I'm not gay either, lol; I likewise very much love you, my brothers and sisters.

We will manifest destiny again.

[Killgaad]

Originally Posted by Tyrantus ↗

C'mon man... be reasonable. You've been here long enough to know whenever a video is posted that features black people (dare I say without fail?) it has some type of bigoted comment on the very 1st page. So for you to say something ambiguous like that and then assume no one here is going to interpret that as such is, frankly, absurd. And I know you understand that, because you eventually address that in your response, and I was with you...

...until you started going full Minka:



I agree, but that's another one of those tricky statements that could be misinterpreted, dont you think?... but lets move on:


Woah....


...moving on...




do you remember when you said this?:


Now I feel like we are back to where we started. These are your words, so how else are we supposed to interpret them?

You've allowed an emotional response take control of you to the point where your original message is completely lost, your credibility is tarnished by hypocrisy and questionable sincerity.

You're a hypocrite not only because you're the one who is demonstrating being easily offended here, but you completely fly off the handle because someone said "Your ignorant, erroneous comments are full of hate." and then YOU go on to confirm it!

P.S.
If this wasn't clear, I actually agree with some of the things you've said in this post and in others. I only have a problem with your lack of humility and how you wield your intellect like a weapon and use it to belittle others while not being receptive to criticism or progressive dialogue. But it's whatever, this is just my opinion.

P.S.S.
Craven and poltroon are synonyms, so using both in the same sentence is redundant. You obviously overlooked this while googling the word.

You see too much into it, Tyrantus (judging by your username, you are appropriating Roman culture btw, since I don't think you're White)—but you make assumptions in a very superficial way, devoid of profound introspection or any perspicaciousness on your part, to speak of.

I could very well psychoanalyze you also, but I neither have the time, nor the inclination to do so thoroughly.

It will however, suffice for now.

Just because I get angry at times, even outright mean, this does not mean my overarching statements and political implications are not correct—and I really do not have to explain myself to you in any way.

I am not a Christ-like figure, but rather his antagonist—I relish in strength, not weakness.

I am only responding to you now because you were somewhat courteous at first, and you said you agreed with certain things I said—though you were not perspicuous enough to specify in detail.

Has it crossed your mind that, aside from being intransigent and peremptory when I'm in a bad mood (to which I am willing to confess)—I simply get pissed off often, because of what has been happening to the Western civilization since the end of WWII, at the hands of the victorious Zionist alien power structure and their traitorous allies who have been flooding our countries with the dregs of the Third World, and are now trying to impose a totalitarian Soviet-style, cultural-Marxist state upon us, and that perhaps I just don't give a fuck about manners or propriety anymore and as such I became the berserker that you people allege my race is at its core (and you are right), that you liberals fear so much deep inside your innermost being, even as you will only succeed in awakening your worst nightmare—as in the past, i.e. the Weimar conditions of quondam time—when we will have become harried and annoyed past our tolerance threshold by communist subversives, just like the neocons and cryptos who try to fuck around with the Russian bear in Ukraine, for example, or the festering, maniacal depredations of the current, woke neo-Soviet Zeitgeist?

Last time the Zionists did that in Russia, 66 million Whites were exterminated in the gulag.

And you want me to be PC?

I don't do PC, and I don't turn the other cheek either—that is gay and weak.

You want to get on my good side, then talk about the merits and supremacy of Western culture, the Great Books, or Bach, Beethoven, and Mozart, and the rest of the White Western titans of art, music and literature—standing in direct opposition to the subversive, subhuman-produced filth manifested in the so-called "modern art," à la "Austrian" (LOL) Arnold Schoenberg (Jewish), who almost single-handedly destroyed European classical music—modern "music" which is no music at all/or the primitive regurgitations of peripatetic Africans, poisoning our ears with hip hop and rap—neither of which is music either.

This is cultural terrorism, perpetrated against the peoples of Europe.

Aleksandr Isayevich Solzhenitsyn wrote all about the 66 million Whites exterminated in the gulag—but the alien power structure forbade the English translation publication of his most important book documenting the genocide perpetrated against the White race by the alien Left.

For that, rest assured, there will be payback, levied against the perpetrators in due time—as history and nature are always cyclical, cleansing and self-renewing at the proximate, most propitious time.

And, oh, we are in need of so much cleansing.

Considering all these grievous matters, have you pondered that oftentimes, that affects what would otherwise be my normal, academic discourse?

I don't have to be nice to anyone I don't respect or like, or I perceive as my enemy.

I also don't owe anyone anything—except allegiance to my people, culture, traditions, history and country.

So why are you applying a double standard? You dare bring up "hypocrisy?"

Why don't you take issue with what antifa and BLM did? Were they nice?

I, for one, *am not nice." For me to be nice to another, one would have to have earned it, or would have to have been in my camp already.

I am now only what my woke enemies make me be.

As for those to whom I am nice—they have earned it, even as I have.

If you are sincere (since you impugn me the opposite, falsely), then why don't you take issue with the neverending hypocrisies and hatred against Whites, harbored by the Left and by progressives, and the lies of the alien-controlled media, who seek to dispossess and eventually exterminate all White peoples of the world, through demographic replacement, ethnic displacement, cultural terrorism, miscegenation/interbreeding with the Third World?

As such, I don't have to be "nice" to people who defend invaders who encroach upon our lands and who dispossess European Americans and Europeans of both birthright and inheritance—the very land that my ancestors have bled for so many times and who made countless sacrifices in order for the likes of you to enjoy the amenities and civilized lifestyle that the White man has provided—lest all of you invaders would still be living in mud huts, smelling like animal dung and putrefied, malodorous integumented faeces.

I have absolutely zero respect for foreign interlopers, squatters of nations, immigrants and migrants, irrespective of whether they are successful or not—for a simple reason:

Neither themselves nor their ancestors ever earned the right to be here or in any of our lands, through blood shed in battle, or through White birthright or posterity—nor could they ever—for they are all economic migrants, and as such, they are depriving our people of jobs and resources and are foreign, alien invaders, usurping, tainting and undermining our society from within.

My people won this land fighting wars for which our ancestors shed their blood unquenched and spent innumerable resources to conquer and develop it into the land the Third World now craves, like the ravenous, insatiable opportunists they are.

The land is ours.

So it is you who is the hypocrite, for implicitly and quasi-tacitly taking issue with the very way nature and human history have always invariably manifested the immanent, implacable quest and expansionist compulsion for progress, conquest and exploration—which you impute to our race, to psychologically disarm/weaken us, when every other ethnicity has behaved in exactly the same way, albeit nowhere near equally successful and conducive to the progress you all now enjoy?

And the lunatic's want to kill their only Golden Goose?

European Americans are the ones being under attack right now, slated for dispossession and genocide, as our enemies are seeking to wipe us out and permanently rob us of our ancestral lands and of the territories we won fair and square in battle (America).

It is their very own words and actions that condemn them.

And you want me to be nice and fair to our enemies?

War is never fair. Our enemies are NOT fair.

So NO. We will be what we *will* it to be—quid pro quo.

Grievance-seekers and perpetually offended SJW never know when to stop, do they?

Take it up with them and hold them accountable for their foibles!

I don't care what the Left/alien supremacists think of me, as there can never be any peace between us.

Have you seen the elephant videos around here, and the just desserts owing to unchecked, perpetual foolishness in provoking someone who already has a history of being the most imperious, implacable and indefatigable warrior race humanity has ever seen?

The left should tread very carefully.

Personally, I wasn't always like this—but this is what the Left has made me be.

Push us hard enough, and we will all eventually become an impenetrable armor—the dreaded Roman phalanx reborn—and no Temple shall be rebuilt ever again this time around—in that disputed, shitty little land.

We all watched the terroristic Left burn our cities, engage in terrorism, murder, assassinations, bonafide insurrection, Marxist revolution, arson, rioting, mass theft-by-Blacks, intimidation of White patrons/innocent bystanders by antifa/BLM and marauding, destructive hordes of blacks, engaged in shameless, locust-like looting, executions of innocent people and children, etc., and you DARE criticize me?

Not a peep from you on any trenchant issues regarding the domestic terrorism perpetrated by Blacks, militant Jews, traitorous deluded white liberals, antifa and BLM against the United States, while you expect from me "humility?"

Did the Romans have humility? Their blood flows within my veins—and so does the Germans'.

Lions do not have humility—that is a weak, Judaical, parasitic attribute, inveigled and grafted unto our race by the perennial subverters and master Semitic propagandists.

Humility is for the slaves and for the vanquished, for the conquered and
for the defeated—not for the puissant.

We would rather die in battle instead.

To my like-minded, cognate brothers and sisters however, I always show respect, kindness and love.

And likewise, to any other person, of any race or ethnicity, who is not a flaming anti-White liberal and a communist.

But to the enemies of my people, there shall be reckoning at the end of my pen-sword—whether it be metaphorically, in writing, or on the future battlefield.

Lastly, FYI, you are ignorant of the fact that it is permissible poetic license, to use synonyms in succession—as intensifiers.

P.S. I don't use Google, since it is owned by the alien censors—and I, for one, don't need to look up the definition of any words in English, except in other languages.

P.P.S. And please don't lecture me on anything English- or ancient Latin etymology-related, because, when it comes to prose, you are clearly a prosaic amateur and out of your league—free-falling onto ignoramus land, by leaps and bounds.

For in your case, the sky is the limit—on the other side of the English-speaking world.

'P.S.S.' is incorrect, as there is no such thing as 'Post scriptum scriptum.'

(If one wishes to append again, one must write 'Post-post scriptum'—ergo, P.P.S.)

I may be arrogant, but at least I have the goods—whereas all you people can do is appropriate culture and arrogantly pass others' work and accomplishments as your own, while you enjoy the fruits of our Western civilization, as the real hypocrites you are.

Now I bid you farewell, to the Wakanda water park.

P.P.P.S. (LOL) I would've been a lot nicer to you, but I don't look kindly upon those who slight me in matters concerning the English language, or benight my person with lies and woke elucubrations.


Adieux.

[Killgaad]

(I must say... for whatever it's worth, I do like your avatar image very much though, Tyrantus.)

[Killgaad]

Erratum: 'lunatics."

[Tyrantus]

Originally Posted by Killgaad ↗

Just because I get angry at times, even outright mean, this does not mean my overarching statements and political implications are not correct—and I really do not have to explain myself to you in any way.

I could very well psychoanalyze you also, but I neither have the time, nor the inclination to do so thoroughly.

For all your verbosity, you’re still an idiot… your response is an example of how its possible to use a lot of words to say nothing, and why it's important to show some humility when trying to have intelligent conversation with someone while being in the wrong.

You just can't say shit like that, and then unironically go on to write a dissertation about political history that includes my psychological makeup, and walk away from that not looking like a complete tool.

-------

I never once said or even implied your information was factually incorrect. I only had two very simple points, which were about the state of our forum, and my opinion of you:

1 - Given the contextual environment of this forum, its illogical to assume a seemingly ambiguous statement about race, in certain threads, couldn't be interpreted as bigoted.

There’s no argument for this, and you know it.

2 - You're a hypocrite, and a pompous ass.

You're also aware of this, and confirm it yourself.

I really do not have to explain myself to you in any way.

I agree, which is why I never once asked you to do so. The brevity and superficiality of my responses were intentional, but you mistake its nature for proselytizing. I don’t give a shit about what you do or don’t believe in, just don’t be a dick about it unless it’s warranted, but if you choose to do so regardless, then people who don’t like bullies are going to call you out on it.

If I wanted to talk to you about your opinion on politics or history, I would’ve brought it up. I didn’t because my post wasn’t about any of that. I think you're a bully, and a hypocrite, so what? You coming to the conclusion that I’m a hypocrite for being some non-white liberal, supporter hater of ANTIFA, and BLM, is funny, but ultimately baseless and doesn't help your argument at all, and just shows how insecure and sensitive you really are when it comes to your intelligence.

I kind of see you like the woman who got herself killed when rushing the Capitol building. I watch the video rant she does from her car on the way to D.C., and I can really appreciate her anger, passion, and commitment to what she believes in, but for all that passion, she will be remembered (if at all) as the Karen who's tiny blood covered titties were displayed live on national television after getting shot rushing the Capitol.

P.S.S.S.T.
You repeatedly put “nice” in quotes , but I never used the word.

----------------------

(I must say... for whatever it's worth, I do like your avatar image very much though, Tyrantus.)

with a blank expression on his face, Tyrantus turns to look at Killgaad and flatly says: Thanks, that means a lot.

[Killgaad]

I'm tired of your stupidity and insolence, Tyrantass [sic]; writing "nice" doesn't mean I'm quoting you, you unlearned, uneducated simpleton (go to school)—it can also imply facetiousness and irony, i.e., as in mocking leftist virtue-signaling (which was my intent)—since you Marxist pieces of shit try to force everyone to conform to your version of sanitized discourse.

I believe in uncensored free speech—under all circumstances and without any exceptions or abridgements.

That is the spirit of the First Amendment.

No bullshit about private forums, or government forums, or the public forum.

You either have free speech across the board—or you have nothing

The fact that I have such disdain of you should speak volumes to you as to how I view you on the evolutionary scale.

If you are a liberal, a leftist—then you are not human in my book, and I will treat you accordingly, since I do not debate with unintelligent creatures.

I despise and I hate your kind and you should not exist.

Now since you have worn out your welcome regarding my educating you (clearly, a hopeless endeavor) in terms of the intricacies and conventions of the English language—according to rules long-established by civilized, learned people over hundreds of years—henceforth I shall charge you a fee, if I am to continue correcting your idiotic mistakes and malapropisms.

We're not talking innocent typos here, but rather fundamental inadequacies, denoting a profound dearth of spirituality, depth and proper education.

I told you already 'P.P.S.' is the correct form, and by persisting, you only make yourself look like a yokel.

I don't waste my time with lost causes.

Please do not address me anymore—I'm not interested in talking to you.

[Dusti_]

Originally Posted by rhubarb_king ↗

Do these people even know the concept of "dignity"?

Nope...porch dwellers...