[elfarouk]

the 5th picture is a mistake, didn't find the edit botton

[Johndoe123]

I understand taking action but wasn't it also proven that this plan to tackle isis was total and utter shit?

[lion]

isis must die period

[TheUrinator]

Originally Posted by elfarouk ↗

more than 70 civilians where dead

so it was not enough what Al-Assad killed from children and civilian , so now it's time to USA to do More

It's comments like this that take away all credibility from your moronic argument.

[jerzpilot]

if in case those are casualties from the US bombings, then take it as payback for all the innocent children isil has killed. PAYBACK BITCHES. And there is still more to come, so don' stop your wining and crying yet.

[jaybo]

Originally Posted by elfarouk ↗

so what ? did isis come to usa and killing people ? and what about al-assad ? even he used a chimical weapon throw 3 years and killing innocent people , children and women, why usa didn't even shoot one bullet on him ?

it sucks but its the fact of what has to happen to get rid of this scum, you don't think isis calculates this so bleeding hearts like you will bitch and moan til they are strong enough to attack us? Wise up

[TheUrinator]

Who kills far more Muslims than the USA? Other Muslims of course! So my question is why aren't muslims outraged at muslims?

[spycosis]

Originally Posted by elfarouk ↗

also if you search the net you can find more photos

I'm trying to look at the facts in this case objectively. Your accusation is that the USA are responsible for the deaths of the people in the pictures you posted. As much as it pains me to see innocent people killed, I cannot take your claims seriously without hard evidence. Having asked you to produce some evidence, it disappoints me that you not only fail to do so, but you also produce more random photographs, that have no date marks, times or locations. These are simple pieces of evidence that one would expect from somebody documenting alleged war crimes and acts of gross incompetence. Yet this evidence, if it exists, has been 'lost in the post', which I find suspicious.
"twiter from defferent activists in syria and from office media of bombarding town like halab , rikka ... etc"
does not constitute evidence. If you tried to use that in a law court you wouldn't get very far.
The airstrikes are being guided in against ISIS by special forces in most cases. They watch the targets first, they know what they are hitting, and they are good at it. That's why if there are reports of massive collateral damage I want details, not just photos from 'twiter'

[PTSD Is My Life]

I'm not going near the fucking mess that this is....safe to say nothing was learnt from when the CIA created the taliban....They turned on their handlers after they got the weapons and millions in cash $$$

Is it really a surprise that the CIA funding IS turned on them too after they received the weapons and cash $$$???

Governments cannot be trusted to organise anything especially when Billions of $ in oil are concerned. But they will happily throw away a few hundred service mens lives on a regular basis to mop up their fucking shit.

[N0way123]

Originally Posted by William May ↗

Sorry, but if you are going to hang around with ISIS, be prepared for the price. Shun them, stay away from them, and don't give them shelter or help. With ISIS hiding within the population, there is no way to separate them out. Only YOU can do that, by avoiding contact with them. If ISIS is going to sleep in your house, then you don't care very much about your children.

dont think they have much of a choice, dumbass.