|
#14
●
10-22-2014, 10:55 AM
|
|
Re: Restaurant Owner Dies After Being Set On Fire
Judging by the near-vomiting, the cameraguy was obviously wrestling with witnessing the horror of the situation, plus dealing with the sickening smell of burnt human flesh, so wasn't able to shoot to your standards. At least he wasn't practically leering over it and jizzing in his trousers like so many of these rubbernecking caught-on-cell-phone-camera creeps you see.
|
|
#18
●
10-22-2014, 07:43 PM
|
|
Re: Restaurant Owner Dies After Being Set On Fire
No one is ever happy. Everyone has complaints no matter what. If the guy filmed the victim, then you'd be whining about how people just stand there and film. This guy actually cared to try and help the victim and filming was secondary. I say good try atleast.
|
|
#19
●
10-23-2014, 07:20 PM
|
|
Re: Restaurant Owner Dies After Being Set On Fire
See, all this arguing about the guy being a shitty cameraman. It's a simple enough choice when something worth filming happens. You ask yourself, "Do I want to rescue this person or do I want to film them dying?" You absolutely, positively cannot do both. Make your choice and deal with the consequences. In this case, the guy tried to do both and ended up with a complete clusterfuck.
|